Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-13-2015
..... good name in man and woman, dear my lord is the immediate jewel of their souls; who steals my purse, steals trash; its something, nothing; 't was mine, its his, and has been slate to thousands; but he that filches from me my good name, robs me of that which not enriches him and makes me poor ..... demands tolerance and detachment of a high order. according to him the considerations, as noticed in the judgment, led to the enactment of the contempt of courts act, 1971 which makes some restrictive departures from the traditional law and implies some wholesome principles which serve as unspoken guidelines in this branch of law. section 2( ..... sentiments of the worshippers who through his mediation and assistance seek spiritual gain and contentment.56. availability of an independent judiciary and an atmosphere wherein judges may act independently and fearlessly is the source of existence of civilisation in society. the directions issued by the court must be obeyed. it is the binding efficacy attaching .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-11-2015
..... arbitrary and illegal, being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india as also contrary to section 3(1)(a) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. dr singhvi further submitted that the supreme court was not concerned with how and in what manner the coal resources would be disposed of after the cancellation order. according to dr singhvi, there were several eventualities. the ..... other company incorporated in india, allotted a schedule i coal mine shall be granted a prospecting licence or a mining lease, as applicable, by the concerned state government in accordance with the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. (10) in relation to schedule ii coal mines, the successful bidder which was a prior allottee, shall continue coal mining operations after the appointed date in terms of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-11-2015
..... arbitrary and illegal, being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india as also contrary to section 3(1)(a) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1973. dr singhvi further submitted that the supreme court was not concerned with how and in what manner the coal resources would be disposed of after the cancellation order. according to dr singhvi, there were several eventualities. the ..... other company incorporated in india, allotted a schedule i coal mine shall be granted a prospecting licence or a mining lease, as applicable, by the concerned state government in accordance with the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. (10) in relation to schedule ii coal mines, the successful bidder which was a prior allottee, shall continue coal mining operations after the appointed date in terms of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-05-2015
..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....
Tag this Judgment!