Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines nationalisation act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 21 of about 257 results (0.137 seconds)

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Sawan Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Darshan Dayal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Krishan Lal Narang Thr. Its Parokar Deepali Naran Vs. Central Bureau ...

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Usha Rani Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Dilbag Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Prem Bahl Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Kailash Kaushik Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Sudha Sachdeva Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Joginder Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... the year 2000 (end of august and early september) and were substituted for the original award lists after breaking open the sealed almirah. the acts highlighted above exhibit contrivance and brazen criminal misconduct, committed consciously to execute the ends of conspiracy. the argument on omission to obtain sanction is, ..... be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Madan Lal Kalra Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... not be taken up at the argument stage. however, it has been taken into consideration thereafter. admittedly, the certificate requirement under section 65b indian evidence act was not complied with. in absence thereof, the same is clearly inadmissible and is, therefore, eschewed from consideration.419. the other circumstance found incriminating ..... itself. the signatures in the certificate were also identified. that is apparently in compliance with the procedure prescribed under section 65b of the evidence act. however, it was held that irrespective of the compliance with the requirements of section 65b, which is a special provision dealing with admissibility of ..... been occasioned thereby. 296. corresponding provision in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 akin to the above highlighted provision comprised in the prevention of corruption act, 1988 is enunciated hitherto-fore :- 465. finding or sentence when reversible by reason of error, omission or irregularity. (1) subject to the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //