Court : Delhi
..... justice navin chawla1 by the present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 21.08.2019 passed by the learned judge family court, district shahdara, karkardooma, delhi in hma no.166/2017, titled dr.vikas gupta v. dr.rajni gupta. the impugned order dismisses the application filed by the petitioner seeking to produce additional documents as also ..... to be determined is whether the impugned order challenged in the present petition can be termed as an interlocutory order within the meaning of section 19(1) of the act.5. a division bench of this court in its judgment dated 13.09.2012 passed in fao3882012, titled manish aggarwal v. seema aggarwal & ors., has considered ..... a measure of abundant caution we clarify that all orders as may be passed by the family court in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 7 of the said act, which have a character of an intermediate order, and are not merely interlocutory orders, would be amenable to the appellate jurisdiction under sub-section (1) of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... mr. justice r.k.gauba judgment1 some confusion prevails concerning the procedure governing the criminal cases involving accusations of offences under the official secrets act, 1923 ( the official secrets act ), certain notifications issued by the central government, some observations in an earlier judgment of a single bench of this court, and a ..... steps taken on the said fir has been submitted till date. reference is made to practice where complaints under section 13 of the official secrets act, 1923 are presented for cognizance to be taken thereupon alongwith evidence collected during the investigation of fir correspondingly registered, such material being presented in ..... law offences (cognizable or non-cognizable, bailable or non-bailable, etc.).17. there can be no quarrel with the proposition that the official secrets act is a special enactment governing the investigation, inquiry or trial of special offences which are not included in the general substantive penal law contained in ipc .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... a plea of law which is not required to be pleaded. however the said argument ignores that fraud is defined in section 17 of the contract act as an act committed by a party to a contract with the intent to deceive another party thereto or to induce him to enter into the contract. thus the ..... 2018 (notified from 1st october, 2018) to remove some impediments imposed thereby to specific performance of contracts and to facilitate specific performance. while section 10 of the act as it stood prior to amendment, made the grant of the relief of specific performance discretionary, post amendment, specific performance of a contract shall be enforced by ..... the settlement agreement.18. the senior counsel for aperam stainless, with reference to the contentions in rejoinder of senior counsel for jindal of section 55 of the contract act, referred to section 46, providing that where no time for performance is specified, performance must be within a reasonable time; the senior counsel for jindal contended, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... a plea of law which is not required to be pleaded. however the said argument ignores that fraud is defined in section 17 of the contract act as an act committed by a party to a contract with the intent to deceive another party thereto or to induce him to enter into the contract. thus the ..... 2018 (notified from 1st october, 2018) to remove some impediments imposed thereby to specific performance of contracts and to facilitate specific performance. while section 10 of the act as it stood prior to amendment, made the grant of the relief of specific performance discretionary, post amendment, specific performance of a contract shall be enforced by ..... the settlement agreement.18. the senior counsel for aperam stainless, with reference to the contentions in rejoinder of senior counsel for jindal of section 55 of the contract act, referred to section 46, providing that where no time for performance is specified, performance must be within a reasonable time; the senior counsel for jindal contended, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the ground that this court does not have pecuniary jurisdiction to hear cases with valuation of less than rs.2 crores. under section 300 of the succession act, the high court and district court have concurrent jurisdiction in probate matters. however, despite clear position of law, counsel for the objector raised this objection in ..... verma, (1995) 1 scc421 the supreme court observed that to enable the courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, pre-variation and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any court to administer justice in ..... by her son, dr. gagan singla and hansraj as the attesting witnesses. she further deposed that she filed an application under section 372 of the indian succession act before the learned civil judge (senior divison), kaithal, haryana for grant of succession certificate on the basis of the will dated 07th december, 1994 for which the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , not freezes, life's processes, if we may mix metaphors.... 38. the court further emphasised the necessity of striking pragmatic balance between the competing requirements of acting urgently and fairly, thus: (scc p. 439, paras 62-63) should the cardinal principle of hearing as condition for decision-making be martyred for the cause ..... empowers the magistrates specified therein to make an ex parte conditional order in emergent cases, for removal of dangerous public nuisances. action under section 17, land acquisition act, furnishes another such instance. similarly, action on grounds of public safety, public health may justify disregard of the rule of prior hearing.34. be that ..... arguing in rejoinder, mr. kamal gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the reliance, by mr. singh, on section 20 of the dse act, is completely misguided, inasmuch as the impugned order has not been passed under the said provision. without prejudice thereto, he relies on the judgment of this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the fir and (ii) that it is actuated by malice of respondent no.2 against the petitioner.7. section 4 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (dspe act) provides for the scheme of superintendence and administration of special police establishment. it reads as follows: 4. superintendence and administration of special police establishment. ..... the complaint prima facie disclosed the commission of offences punishable under sections 7, 7a, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (pc act) and section 120b indian penal code, 1860; that the complainant had specifically stated that he was being unnecessary harassed in order to extort money from ..... (1) the superintendence of the delhi special police establishment insofar as it relates to investigation of offences alleged to have been committed under the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (49 of 1988), shall vest in the commission. (2) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (1), the superintendence of the said police .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the fir and (ii) that it is actuated by malice of respondent no.2 against the petitioner.7. section 4 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (dspe act) provides for the scheme of superintendence and administration of special police establishment. it reads as follows: 4. superintendence and administration of special police establishment. ..... the complaint prima facie disclosed the commission of offences punishable under sections 7, 7a, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (pc act) and section 120b indian penal code, 1860; that the complainant had specifically stated that he was being unnecessary harassed in order to extort money from ..... (1) the superintendence of the delhi special police establishment insofar as it relates to investigation of offences alleged to have been committed under the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (49 of 1988), shall vest in the commission. (2) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (1), the superintendence of the said police .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the fir and (ii) that it is actuated by malice of respondent no.2 against the petitioner.7. section 4 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (dspe act) provides for the scheme of superintendence and administration of special police establishment. it reads as follows: 4. superintendence and administration of special police establishment. ..... the complaint prima facie disclosed the commission of offences punishable under sections 7, 7a, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (pc act) and section 120b indian penal code, 1860; that the complainant had specifically stated that he was being unnecessary harassed in order to extort money from ..... (1) the superintendence of the delhi special police establishment insofar as it relates to investigation of offences alleged to have been committed under the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (49 of 1988), shall vest in the commission. (2) save as otherwise provided in sub-section (1), the superintendence of the said police .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 19(6) as it originally stood; the subject- matter covered by the said provision being justiciable, and the amendment adds that the state monopolies or nationalisation schemes which may be introduced by legislation, are an illustration or reasonable restrictions imposed in the interests of the general public and must be treated as ..... or animal life altogether.81. the judgment in utkal contractors v. state of orissa air1987scc2310is instructive. in that the petitioners were holding long term mining leases by the orissa forest produce. the state enacted a law aimed at smuggling foreign produce and also to provide state monopoly in forest produce and ..... after deliberations recommended that the manufacture and sale of the oxytocin injections should be banned for veterinary use under section 26a of the drugs, and cosmetics act, 1940 along with the condition that the manufacturers of bulk drug, oxytocin should/supply the manufacturers licensed for manufacture of oxytocin formulation for human use .....
Tag this Judgment!