Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines conservation and development act 1974 chapter iv miscellaneous Court: us supreme court Page 3 of about 24 results (0.097 seconds)

Nov 18 2021 (SC)

National Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... act itself. the question, therefore, is whether absence of specific provision as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 that the shareholding shall always be held by the government, will give a different complexion to these provisions. when the provisions of the act ..... . the argument that there is no specific provision in the act as contained in the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act or in the coal mines nationalisation act, 1973 does not carry the matter any further because the idea embedded in those provisions are implicit in the provisions of this enactment, as explained ..... entertain the plea of res judicata. as we have already pointed out when the order of 12-3-1985, was made, no reference to the forest (conservation) act of 1980 had been done. we are of the view that leaving the question open for examination in future would lead to unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2000 (SC)

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... of mineral resources going under submergence.* alternative fuels to the labourers.* micro-climatic changes.* arrangements made for treatment of catchment area including soil conservation afforestation.* steps taken for preserving archaeological and historical monuments.* proper land use*actions taken by government of maharashtra in pursuance of dewan committee ..... will consist of experts in the following disciplines:(i) eco-system management (ii) air/water pollution control(iii) water resource management(iv) flora/fauna conservation and management(v) land use planning(vi) social sciences/rehabilitation(vii) project appraisal(viii) ecology(ix) environmental health(x) subject area specialists(xi ..... the sites were inspected by engineers and geologists who recommended detailed investigation for seven projects. thereafter in 1948, the central ministry of works, mines & power appointed an ad-hoc committee headed by shri a.n. khosla, chairman, cwinc to study the projects and to recommend the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1978 (FN)

BaldwIn Vs. Fish and Game Comm'n of Montana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... challenge simply by asserting that the discrimination was a rational means for fostering a legitimate state interest. instead, even though an important state objective -- conservation -- was at stake, toomer held that a classification based on the fact of noncitizenship was constitutionally infirm "unless there is something to indicate that noncitizens ..... charges to be made on nonresidents based on both the added enforcement costs the presence of nonresident hunters imposes on montana and the state's conservation expenditures supported by resident-borne taxes. their position throughout this litigation has been that the higher fee extracted from nonresident elk hunters is not ..... increased more dramatically than the number of resident hunters during the past decade, ante at 436 u. s. 374 -375, thus somewhat overstates the putative conservation threat nonresident hunters pose for montana's wildlife. [ footnote 2/7 ] this restriction on the number of big game hunters allowed into montana is thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2021 (SC)

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on 18.03.2006, in less than three weeks of the decision of this court32, the ker- ala state legislature amended the 2003 act by introducing kerala irrigation and water conservation (amendment) act, 200633, which was the subject matter of judgment in ques- tion. the said act was challenged by the state of tamil nadu in an original suit ..... of t.n. & ors., (2002) 3 scc533(para9) 10 hand said, but words must be construed with some imagination of the purposes which lie behind them . (see lenigh valley coal co. v. yensavage [218 fr547 .) the view was reiterated in union of india v. filip tiago de gama of vedem vasco de gama [(1990) 1 scc277: air1990sc981 . xx xx ..... amounts to usurpation of judi- cial power inasmuch as kerala state legislature has arro- gated to itself the role of a judicial body and has itself deter- mined the questions regarding the dam safety and raising the water level when such questions fall exclusively within the province of the judiciary and have already been deter .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //