Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines conservation and development act 1974 chapter iv miscellaneous Court: us supreme court Page 1 of about 24 results (0.225 seconds)

May 09 1980 (SC)

Tara Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1682; (1980)4SCC179; [1980]3SCR1042

..... 1974, in order, principally, to provide for the conservation of coal and development of coal mines. section 4(1) of that act enables the central government, for the purposes of conservation of coal and for the development of coal mines, to exercise such powers and take or ..... neither be a systematic regulation of mines nor a scientific development of minerals. the importance of conservation of natural resources in any scheme of regulation and development of such resources can be seen from the fact that the parliament had to pass in august 1974 an act called the coal mines (conservation and development) act, 28 of ..... or as may be prescribed. by section 5(1), a duty, is cast on the owners, of coal mines to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure the conservation of coal and development of the coal mines owned by them. while moving the nationalisation amendment act in the lok sapha on may 17, 1976, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... the central government, regard being had toquality thereof, had all along been subjected to statutory orders. thegradation of coal decedent upon the quality thereof was to be determined bythe 'coal board' constituted under the coal mines conservation and safetyact. quality of coal may depend not only on the location of the coal minesbut also from the particular seams wherefrom it is extracted. requirementof maintenance of price of ..... coal on an all-india basis had all along beenconsidered to be imperative in the economic and industrial development ofthe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2012 (SC)

Dropti Devi and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on december 19, 1974. its preamble reads as under: "an act to provide for preventive detention in certain cases for the purposes of conservation and augmentation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities and for matters connected therewith. whereas violations of foreign exchange regulations and smuggling activities are ..... law regulating certain payments, dealings in foreign exchange and securities, transactions indirectly affecting foreign exchange and the import and export of currency for the conservation of the foreign exchange resources of the country and the proper utilization thereof in the interest of the economic development of the country. section 2 ..... of prosecution. however, in cofeposa viz., the power to detain a person to prevent him from indulging in any prejudicial activities relating to conservation or augmentation of foreign exchange is given although there is no corresponding penal punitive law available.he referred to various provisions of fema, particularly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2005 (SC)

Zee Telefilms Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2677; (2005)4CompLJ283(SC); JT2005(2)SC8; (2005)4SCC649

..... special that the argument carries even less conviction than it is usually apt to do when invoked against some moderate advance in the common law.australia:132. in romeo v. conservation commission of the northern territory [(1998) 72 aljr 208, kirby j. noticed that in the arena of liability of public authority declaring the limits of the common law liability of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1979 (SC)

Kewal Krishan Puri and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1008; (1980)1SCC416; [1979]3SCR1217

..... their domestic use; a crore for air spray; five crores to the punjab state electricity board, one crore given to markfed, one and a half crore to soil conservation department and yet nine crores were lying surplus with the various market committees. the figure may be exaggerated but are not quite groundless. we are merely quoting them for ..... of the traders. the literal meaning of the phrase 'quid pro quo' is 'one for the other' meaning thereby-'you charge the fee for the service.' service to the mining area, factory, market or marketing operations are services to the payer of the fee.57. mr. p.n. lekhi, under counsel for the state of haryana placed some new ..... that the leading principle has not basically undergone any change.16. in the case of the hingir-rampur coal co., ltd. and ors. v. the state of orissa and ors. : [1961]2scr537 the challenge was to the cess levied by the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952. the petitioners' stand in the first instance was that the cess levied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1996 (SC)

Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)641; JT1996(4)SC263; 1996(3)SCALE579; (1996)5SCC281; [1996]Supp1SCR507

..... coastal areas, as a pre-requisite to environmental management of the area. such a status report was required to be followed by a master plan identifying the areas required for conservation, preservation and development and other activities. a master plan so prepared would ensure a scientific assessment and development of the coastline and this would ultimately ensure the preservation and enforcement ..... , channels and ports and for prevention of sandbars and also except for tidal regulators, storm water drains and structures for prevention of salinity ingress and for sweet water recharge;ix) mining of sands, rocks and other substrata materials, except those rare minerals not available outside the crz areas;x) harvesting or drawal of ground water and construction of mechanisms therefore, within .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2024 (SC)

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... entry 23 of list ii to the extent the parliamentary legislation covers the subject-matter. the legislative powers of the state with 354 (1982) 1 scc125355 coal mines act 356 western coalfields ltd (supra) [28].. 165 part i respect to other subjects under list ii, including taxes on lands and buildings, will ..... , where both the union and the states have certain duties and responsibilities. these responsibilities take the form of development of infrastructure, facilitation of exploration and mining activities, conservation of 300 supreme court of india, record of proceedings, civil appeal no.4056-4064/1999 (14 march 2023) 54. 301 national mineral policy 2019 ..... to be scientific and judicious. the mmdr act enumerates rules and regulations to ensure that the exploration, extraction, and exploitation of minerals follow standards of conservation and sustainability. the indian state is the trustee of all natural resources, including minerals.279 therefore, it is a constitutional duty of the state to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1981 (FN)

Commonwealth Edison Co. Vs. Montana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... this ground, appellants may be assuming that the montana tax is, in fact, intended to reimburse the state for the cost of specific services furnished to the coal mining industry. alternatively, appellants could be arguing that a state's power to tax an activity connected to interstate commerce cannot exceed the value of the services specifically provided ..... that the montana tax substantially frustrates and impairs the policies. we cannot quarrel with appellants' recitation of federal statutes encouraging the use of coal. appellants correctly note that 2(6) of the energy policy and conservation act of 1975, 89 stat. 874, 42 u.s.c. 6201(6), declares that one of the act's purposes is ..... "to reduce the demand for petroleum products and natural gas through programs designed to provide greater availability and use of this nation's abundant coal resources." and 102(b)(3) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2020 (SC)

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... law regulating dealings in foreign exchange and 43. (2008) 13 scc30544. (1997) 3 scc72145. air1996sc522275 securities, transactions indirectly affecting foreign exchange and the import and export of currency, for the conservation of foreign exchange resources of the country and proper utilization thereof in the interest of the economic development of the country. the fera was repealed by the foreign exchange management .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1980 (FN)

Fullilove Vs. Klutznick

Court : US Supreme Court

..... federal grant statutes have contained similar prohibitions against discrimination in particular funded activities. see, e.g., state and local fiscal assistance amendments of 1976, 31 u.s.c. 1242; energy conservation and production act, 42 u.s.c. 6870; housing and community development act of 1974, 42 u.s.c. 5309; comprehensive employment and training act of 1973, 29 u.s .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //