Court : US Supreme Court
..... problem of extinction. senators and congressmen uniformly deplored the irreplaceable loss to aesthetics, science, ecology, and the national heritage should more species disappear." coggins, conserving wildlife resources: an overview of the endangered species act of 1973, 51 n.d.l.rev. 315, 321 (1975). (emphasis added.) the legislative ..... , by a tangle of lawsuits and administrative proceedings. after unsuccessfully urging tva to consider alternatives to damming the little tennessee, local citizens and national conservation groups brought suit in the district court, claiming that the project did not conform to the requirements of the national environmental policy act of 1969 ..... . . . with the assistance of the secretary, utilize their authorities in furtherance of the purposes of [the] act by carrying out programs for the conservation of endangered species . . . and by taking such action necessary to insure that actions authorized, funded, or carried out by them do not jeopardize the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... species of fish, wildlife, and plants in the united states have been rendered extinct as a consequence 589 of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation," and that these species "are of aesthetic, ecological, educational, historical, recreational, and scientific value to the nation and its people." 1531(1), (3) ..... to "any foreign country (with its consent) ... in the development and management of programs in that country which [are] ... necessary or useful for the conservation of any endangered species or threatened species listed by the secretary pursuant to section 1533 of this title." 16 u. s. c. 1537(a). it also ..... fed. reg. 29990, and promulgated in 1986, 51 fed. reg. 19926; 50 cfr 402.01 (1991). shortly thereafter, respondents, organizations dedicated to wildlife conservation and other environmental causes, filed this action against the secretary of the interior, seeking a declaratory judgment that the new regulation is in error as to the geographic .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 2006, in less than three weeks of the decision of this court in mullaperiyar environmental protection forum1, the kerala state legislature amended 2003 act by the kerala irrigation and water conservation (amendment) act, 2006 [for short, 2006 (amendment) act )].[2]..15. in the second schedule, appended to the 2006 (amendment) act, the mullaperiyar dam owned ..... the court. (emphasis supplied by us) municipal corporation of the city of ahmedabad 97. the above three decisions and one more decision of this court in amalgamated coal fields[38]. were noted by the two-judge bench of this court in the municipal corporation of the city of ahmedabad16. while accepting that the legislature under ..... . 327]. [33]. union of india v. elphinstone spinning and weaving co. ltd. and ors.; [(2001) 4 scc139. [34]. sanjeev coke manufacturing co. v. m/s. bharat coking coal ltd. and anr.; [(1983) 1 scc147 [35]. m/s. doypack systems pvt. ltd. v. union of india and ors.; [(1988) 2 scc299 [36]. mahal chand sethia v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... kennedy, thomas, and alito, jj.), not to mention the entire aca, post, at 49 64 (same). for when a court confronts an unconstitutional statute, its endeavor must be to conserve, not destroy, the legislature s dominant objective. see, e.g., ayotte v. planned parenthood of northern new eng., 546 u. s. 320 330 (2006). in this case, ..... funding offered by the medicaid expansion, and surely no basis to tear down the aca in its entirety. when a court confronts an unconstitutional statute, its endeavor must be to conserve, not destroy, the legislation. see, e.g., ayotte v. planned parenthood of northern new eng., 546 u. s. 320 330. pp. 60 61. roberts, c. j ..... c. knight co., 156 u. s. 1, 12 (1895) ( commerce succeeds to manufacture, and is not a part of it. ); carter v. carter coal co., 298 u. s. 238, 304 (1936) ( mining brings the subject matter of commerce into existence. commerce disposes of it. ). the court also sought to distinguish activities having a direct effect on interstate commerce, and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . a conjoint reading of the aforesaid provisions would reveal that a responsibility is cast upon the state as well as the citizens to protect and conserve the heritage. 113 undisputedly, phase i of chandigarh, i.e., corbusian chandigarh, even according to the respondent authorities, possesses a heritage status. ..... the re utilization of the identified housing /institutional pockets in the first phase shall be undertaken with the prior approval of the chandigarh heritage conservation committee. .. additional far and ground coverage to private housing the chandigarh administration vide notification dated 16/10/2008 has already permitted increased ground coverage ..... and re densification of any government residential/institutional pocket in phase i sectors should only be done with the prior approval of the chandigarh heritage conservation committee (for short, heritage committee ).10. the aforesaid recommendations were accepted by the central government and all references to the apartments in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : International Court of Justice ICJ
..... international obligations arising under the 1971 ramsar convention on wetlands, the 1973 convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora and the 1992 convention on biodiversity conservation and protection of priority wild areas in central america. 89. the court considers that, over the course of the century and a half since the 1858 treaty was concluded, the ..... humides, de la convention de 1973 sur le commerce international des esp ces de faune et de flore sauvages menac es dextinction et de la convention de 1992 pour la conservation de la diversit biologique et la protection des r gions fauniques prioritaires dam rique centrale. 89. la cour estime que, au cours des cent cinquante ans qui se sont coul .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pruthvi wodeyar, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka revenue department m s building bengaluru-560 001 represented by its secretary2. the chief conservator of forest chikkamagaluru division chikkamagaluru-577101 3 . deputy forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru district-577126 4 . assistant forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru ..... ...petitioners (by sri. prashanth h.s, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bengaluru560001. 2 . the deputy conservator of forests koppa division, koppa, chikkamagaluru-577 101. 3 . the divsiional forest officer chikkamagaluru division, narasimharajapura taluk, chikkamagaluru district-577 101. 4 . the tahasildar taluk ..... complaint cannot be brushed aside. this opinion seems to have been formed on the basis of the petitioners having remitted fine to the mines and geology department for having stored the minor mineral extracted in the adjacent government land. on this basis, it cannot 668 be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pruthvi wodeyar, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka revenue department m s building bengaluru-560 001 represented by its secretary2. the chief conservator of forest chikkamagaluru division chikkamagaluru-577101 3 . deputy forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru district-577126 4 . assistant forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru ..... ...petitioners (by sri. prashanth h.s, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bengaluru560001. 2 . the deputy conservator of forests koppa division, koppa, chikkamagaluru-577 101. 3 . the divsiional forest officer chikkamagaluru division, narasimharajapura taluk, chikkamagaluru district-577 101. 4 . the tahasildar taluk ..... complaint cannot be brushed aside. this opinion seems to have been formed on the basis of the petitioners having remitted fine to the mines and geology department for having stored the minor mineral extracted in the adjacent government land. on this basis, it cannot 668 be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pruthvi wodeyar, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka revenue department m s building bengaluru-560 001 represented by its secretary2. the chief conservator of forest chikkamagaluru division chikkamagaluru-577101 3 . deputy forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru district-577126 4 . assistant forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru ..... ...petitioners (by sri. prashanth h.s, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bengaluru560001. 2 . the deputy conservator of forests koppa division, koppa, chikkamagaluru-577 101. 3 . the divsiional forest officer chikkamagaluru division, narasimharajapura taluk, chikkamagaluru district-577 101. 4 . the tahasildar taluk ..... complaint cannot be brushed aside. this opinion seems to have been formed on the basis of the petitioners having remitted fine to the mines and geology department for having stored the minor mineral extracted in the adjacent government land. on this basis, it cannot 668 be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... pruthvi wodeyar, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka revenue department m s building bengaluru-560 001 represented by its secretary2. the chief conservator of forest chikkamagaluru division chikkamagaluru-577101 3 . deputy forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru district-577126 4 . assistant forest officer koppa division koppa chikkamagaluru ..... ...petitioners (by sri. prashanth h.s, advocate) and:1. . the state of karnataka by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bengaluru560001. 2 . the deputy conservator of forests koppa division, koppa, chikkamagaluru-577 101. 3 . the divsiional forest officer chikkamagaluru division, narasimharajapura taluk, chikkamagaluru district-577 101. 4 . the tahasildar taluk ..... complaint cannot be brushed aside. this opinion seems to have been formed on the basis of the petitioners having remitted fine to the mines and geology department for having stored the minor mineral extracted in the adjacent government land. on this basis, it cannot 668 be .....
Tag this Judgment!