Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coal mines conservation and development act 1974 chapter i preliminary Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 8 results (0.204 seconds)

Jan 05 2009 (HC)

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

..... sub-section (1) the government company shall, on and from the date of such vesting, be deemed to have become the lessee in relation to such coal mine as if a mining lease in relation to the coal mine has been granted to the government company and the period of such lease could have been granted under the mineral concession rules; and all the rights ..... background of above provisions under maharashtra land revenue code. section 18 of this act casts duty upon the central government to take all such steps as may be necessary for conservation and systematic development of minerals in india and for protection of environment by preventing or controlling any pollution and to make rules for that purpose. sub-section (2) gives heads .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1983 (HC)

Basantibai Fakirchand Khetan and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom366; 1984MhLJ534

..... any other means of communication, transport supply of water and electricity , any other source of energy street lighting, drainage, sewerage, education and welfare projects, markets and conservancy and any convenience which the state government may specify to the be an amentity. sub-section (2) of section 28 prescribed that in addition the authority or board ..... and confers power to sell the land vested in the board, expression 'development' is defined under section 2(13) and means 'carrying out of building , engineering , mining or other operations in or over,, or undder, any land (including land under sea , crock, river, lake or any other water) or the making of nay ..... is no longer a good law in view of the subsequent decision of the supreme court, : [1983]1scr1000 , sanjeev coke manufacturing company v bharat coking coal ltd. the submission cannot be accepted and both the reasons suggested by the learned counsel are devoid of anymerit. the first submission that the question of validity .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2008 (HC)

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

..... estoppal' cannot be applied against the administration to compel it to allot the original plots because that would be permitting violation of statutes intended to conserve forest and restrictions imposed in the interest of general public and security of ntion under aircrafts act. doctrine of 'estoppal' cannot, therefore, be ..... the state being in degraded and over exploited state, which was adversely affecting the agriculture and agricultural population, so also for the purpose of conservating the material resources and protecting them from destruction and from over exploitation by the owners, that, it became necessary to enact the private forest ..... adversely affecting agriculture and agricultural population;and whereas it is, therefore, expedient to acquire private forests in the state of maharashtra generally for conserving their material resources and protecting them from destruction or over exploitation by their owners or promoting systematic and scientific development and management of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2006 (HC)

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

..... proper land use, zoning and control of development. ii) to decongest and redevelop the overcrowded developments and slums so as to improve environmental conditions. iii) to conserve orderly existing environmental amenities. iv) to improve the living conditions by augmenting infrastructural facilities. v) to foster new development in the suburbs and extended suburbs on ..... and the controversy before the court is as to whether for social safety and for creating a hazard free environment for the people to live in, mining in the area should be permitted or stopped. we may not be taken to have said that for public interest litigations, procedural laws do not apply ..... to the dcr thereby providing for grant of tdr in respect of heritage buildings. the conservation and protection of heritage buildings is a matter of planning. in fact, these modifications are done with a primary object of conserving and preserving the overall heritage of the city and for effective implementation of this objective, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2014 (HC)

Dattatraya Hari Mane and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

..... . there is an affidavit dated 10th october, 2014 filed by shri manish b. pawar, the hydraulic engineer of the fourth respondent corporation. it refers to national river conservation plan sanctioned by the national river conservation directorate. it deals with various short term and long term measures taken by the said corporation including making arrangements for artificial ponds for immersion of ganesh idols .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1999 (HC)

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

..... p. 619) : 'as we said earlier, under the scheme of the act, it is the reserve bank of india that is constituted and entrusted with the task of regulating and conserving foreign exchange. if one may use such an expression, it is the 'custodian--general' of foreign exchange. the task of enforcement is left to the directorate of enforcement but it ..... wlr 180 (hl) was referred to and followed in the correct perspective. he also referred to a judgment of the supreme court in the case of kuju collieries v. jharkhand mines ltd., : [1975]1scr703 , to contend that the contract would be void vis-a-vis the defendants. in para. 8 of the judgment, the supreme court observed as follows (page ..... him to the relief to which he would otherwise be entitled. he also referred me to the another judgment of the chancery division in the case of mosely v. koffyfontein mines, ltd. [1911] 1 ch d 73. in that case, the plaintiff who was a director of the company at the relevant time had originated the alteration in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1984 (HC)

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)

..... through the activities permitted by or under the statute or the notifications governing the constitution of these institutions. they are mainly intended to attract and conserve funds for the purpose of investment and for advancing loans required for accelerated growth of the trade, commerce and industry and for all round development ..... and limit the inflow of foreign remittances and investment of foreign funds in india and also outflow of foreign investment and profits from india and to conserve foreign exchange in accordance with the provisions of the fera. the fera does not envisage free flow of foreign exchange for the purpose of investment. ..... certain payments, dealings in foreign exchange and securities, transactions indirectly affection foreign exchange and the import and export of currency and bullion, for the conservation of the foreign exchange resources of the country and the proper utilisation thereof in the interests of the economic development of the country.'53. towards this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2003 (TRI)

Mid East Port Folio Management Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2003)87ITD537(Mum.)

..... -down value of energy-saving devices, pollution-control devices, waste-control or management devices, etc.these provisions were apparently introduced with the object of controlling pollution, efficient management of waste, conservation of energy, etc. in the case of slbs whose object is the avoidance or evasion of taxes, the choice of assets is almost always the single most decisive criterion, there ..... remanded to the ao with directions to him to examine the applicability of the said explanation as was done by the calcutta bench in the case of karamchand thapar & bros. (coal sales) ltd. v. dy. cit (1998) 61 ttj (cal) 576 : (1998) 66 itr 39 (call explanation 3 says that where before the date of acquisition by the assessee, the assets .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //