Clearly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: clearly Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.221 seconds)Commissioner of Cus. Vs. Impex Clearing and Shipping
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-13-2002
Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT483Tri(Mum.)bai
1 ld counsel for the respondents herein raises a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the appeal filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShakti Clearing Agency (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
Reported in: (2003)80TTJ(Rajkot.)668
1 the present four appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the learned cit a dt...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommr. of Customs Vs. D.K. Clearing Agency
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-20-2002
Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT821Tri(Mum.)bai
1 the appeal by the commissioner is against the order of the commissioner of customs ordering restoration of the licence...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHina Shipping and Clearing (Cochin) Vs. C.C. (Gen.)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-13-2002
Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT457Tri(Mum.)bai
..... whether the past consignments were spurious or not the present consignment which was seized was clearly not exported through the present appellants in the absence of the status of the past ..... premature 5 this appeal is allowed the impugned order is set aside it is made clear that the commissioner shall be within his right to institute proceedings against the present appellants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex., Vs. Bilt Rite Packaging (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2002
Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT479TriDel
1 this appeal is by the revenue challenging the decision of the adjudicating and first appellate authorities allowing modvat credit...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGarha Containers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC838
..... order was received on 12 11 2000 with reference to that date their appeal was clearly time barred therefore rejection of the appeal on the ground of time bar cannot be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshwani Kr. Jain, Sh. Pawan Kr. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC289
1 the adjudicating authority confirmed the following demands and imposed following penalties 1 m s meerut exim meerut demand of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindusthan Engg. and Industries Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Apr-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(104)LC848Tri(Kol.)kata
1 vide the impugned order commissioner has confirmed amount of duty of rs 23 29 390 rupees twenty three lakh...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGupta Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC452
1 all these batch of appeals raise a common question of law and facts and hence they are taken up...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSawalka Auto Indus. (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Kolkata-i
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Apr-19-2002
Reported in: (2002)LC753Tri(Kol.)kata
1 after dispensing with the condition of pre deposit of penalty amount of rs 26 814 rupees twenty six thousand...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial