Clearing - Year 2012 - Judgments

Jun 18 2012 (TRI)

Pratima Clearing Agency Vs. Commissioner of Customs (General)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-18-2012

by the importers as the appellant has dealt with the clearance of the above goods therefore their cha licence was suspended

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 2012 (TRI)

M/S. Schankar Clearing and Forwarding Vs. Commissioner of Customs Delh ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-11-2012

..... in the name of an importer without their knowledge description quantity and nature of goods cleared under the said bills of entry was not known because the goods were not subjected ..... facie shows that the appellant was involved in filing a fraudulent bill of entry and clearing unknown goods so we are of the view that the suspension order should not be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 16 2012 (HC)

“it Is Clearly Held in Supreme Court Cases That there Is an Inherent ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-16-2012

..... the trial court dismissed the application with the following observations it is clearly held in supreme court cases that there is an inherent right to ..... plaint in clause d of order 7 rule 11 cpc it is clearly mentioned in section 92 that direction of the court is necessary for ..... it is quite civil revision no 2006 of 2006 o m 5 clear that none of the reliefs claimed by the plaintiffs fell within the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2012 (TRI)

Kaleshwar Minerals Vs. Shivsu Canadian Clear Waters Technology Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-20-2012

..... of self emplacement this venture of kaleshwar minerals thus makes it clear that it is established for earning the profit and the same is ..... must be some employees for operating mineral waters thus it is clear that this factory was not being run by the complainant through their ..... has also been signed by the present complainant there is a clear mention that no claims such as loss of production loss .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2012 (TRI)

Manilal Patel Clearing Forwarding P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-16-2012

..... obtained any authorisation letter from the exporter for undertaking the custom clearing work and he also admitted his mistake that he undertook ..... as the same are based on the material on record which clearly shows that the appellant had acted as cha and had ..... the cha since 2003 that more than hundred consignments have been cleared by them that accordingly the requirement of obtaining an authorization .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 2012 (HC)

Smt. Varinder Kaur Sodhi Vs. State of West Bengal and Others

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-13-2012

..... higher scale of pay to the petitioner the proviso added to para 12 3 indicates clearly that higher scale of pay can be granted to a teacher acquiring higher educational qualification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2012 (HC)

RanialingegowdA. Vs. SidduregowdA.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-12-2012

..... 26 8 1937 and the respondent did not adduce any evidence when there is a clear admission on the part of the plaintiff that he knew the sale deed in favour .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2012 (HC)

Rajkumar Shivhare Vs Union of India .

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-26-2012

..... noticee who was a partner in the betting business was also recorded these statements could clearly be relied upon by the adjudicating officer having regard to the law laid down by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2012 (SC)

Bhushan Kumar and anr Vs. State(Nct of Delhi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-04-2012

..... does not mandate the magistrate to explicitly state the reasons for issuance of summons it clearly states that if in the opinion of a magistrate taking cognizance of an offence there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 2012 (HC)

A.Palaniammal Vs. the Superintendent of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-12-2012

..... was no answer even as per the proceedings dated 31 03 2010 it is very clear that the 2nd respondent only on the allegations made by the petitioner and on a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Clearing - Judgment Search Results