Skip to content


Clarify - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: clarify Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 85 results (0.019 seconds)
Oct 22 1963 (SC)

Vora Abbasbhai Alimahomed Vs. Haji Gulamnabi Haji Safibhai

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-22-1963

Reported in: AIR1964SC1341; (1964)0GLR55; [1964]5SCR157

..... including the existing norms of floor space index the ministry of environment and forest had clarified that the existing dc regulations applicable to crz ii areas in mumbai would mean the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 1963 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Raja Reddy Mallaram.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-20-1963

Reported in: [1964]51ITR285(SC)

..... determining the assessable value satisfied all the criteria of a trade discount stipulated in the clarifi catory order b that the claim for deduction of product discounts prompt payment discount year .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 1963 (HC)

K. Vaman Shenoy Vs. Collector of South Kanara, Mangalore

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-07-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Kant64; AIR1964Mys64; 1964CriLJ418; ILR1963KAR670; (1963)2MysLJ258

..... either before the l a o or before the deputy commissioner it is needless to clarify that the petitioners are entitled for rent or damages for use of the lands by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 1963 (HC)

M. Clarance Vs. M. Raicheal and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-11-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Kant67; AIR1964Mys67; ILR1963KAR788; (1963)2MysLJ122

..... either before the l a o or before the deputy commissioner it is needless to clarify that the petitioners are entitled for rent or damages for use of the lands by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 1963 (HC)

S. K. Dutta Vs. Member, Board of Agricultural Income-tax, Assam.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Apr-03-1963

..... there is any substance in either of these contentions the proviso only clarifies the substantive rule 25a 1 it does not nullify that clause nor ..... made by the company and thus the proviso in our opinion only clarifies the substantive portion of rule 25a it cannot be said to nullify ..... portion of rule 25a or not in our opinion the proviso only clarifies the provisions of rule 25a 1 and thus it is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1963 (HC)

A.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Apr-18-1963

Reported in: AIR1965Guj234a

..... said sub section 5 of section 115 may kindly be clarified for the information of the state government on 12th march ..... of the central government in the ministry of home affairs clarified the position of the central government on this question by ..... the central government accordingly asked the government of bombay to clarify the position the government of bombay thereupon amended rule 18 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1963 (HC)

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shanti Prasad JaIn and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Apr-18-1963

Reported in: AIR1963Ori189

..... of paragraph 52 are as follows in order to resolve conflicting judicial decisions and to clarify the intention of the legislature as we understand them we propose that this section should ..... s contention is correct the necessary words should have been incorporated in section 81 to clarify that the wide powers of the company in general meeting is to be restricted only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 1963 (HC)

State of Orissa Vs. Maheswar Alias Ghodamaru Ghasi and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jul-30-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Ori37; 30(1964)CLT229; 1964CriLJ210

..... in his contention but unfortunately the learned public prosecutor before the sessions judge has not clarified the position p w 6 states there is no fence or wall from the bari ..... w 5 himself categorically asserts to the contrary and the learned public prosecutor did not clarify the position in re examination p ws 7 and 8 do not at all refer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 1963 (HC)

Anglo-french Textiles Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Pondicherry State ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-25-1963

Reported in: (1966)IILLJ434Mad

..... a record of non conciliation 13 it is necessary to pause at this stage for clarifying a french term proces verbal which has been translated into english vide translation of the ..... give any direction by way of mandamus because of the way in which we have clarified the terms of the reference in this judgment for guidance in the further disposal of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1963 (HC)

Tamilnad Electricity Workers Federation and anr. Vs. Madras State Elec ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-1963

Reported in: AIR1965Mad111

..... though it may be that a period of conciliation had been commenced in order to clarify this it is necessary proceed into the assumptions upon which the appellants which are tow .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //