Skip to content


Clandestine - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: clandestine Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 200 results (0.007 seconds)
Jan 31 2007 (TRI)

Chatterjee Petrochem Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Jan-31-2007

Reported in: (2008)143CompCas726

..... the allotment on two extraneous grounds one is that the alleged clandestine agreement with ioc was not disclosed to the petitioners and ..... therefore the allegation of the petitioners that there was a secret clandestine agreement of ioc the non disclosure of which is fatal ..... to the shares is governed by the terms of the alleged clandestine agreement however in the rejoinder the petitioners have taken a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 2007 (TRI)

Kripal Springs (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Feb-27-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC224

..... the allegation that excisable goods i e spring leaves of different size and varities were clandestinely manufactured and removed without payment of duty adjudication was made by order in original cce ..... successive investigations stated earlier have also resulted with levy of demand on the appellant proving clandestine removal as well as manufacture of such kind the appellant failed to submit any reply .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 2007 (TRI)

Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Feb-13-2007

Reported in: (2007)(118)ECC313

..... of central excise appeals bangalore 2 revenue proceeded against the appellants on grounds of clandestine removal and manufacture of pharmaceutical formulations on the basis of discrepancies between the batch ..... assumptions presumptions surmises and conjectures and not based on even a singly instance of clandestine removal iv there is no evidence of excess consumption of raw materials packing materials .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 2007 (TRI)

Gopal Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-29-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC173

..... particulars contained in this private record clearly go to show their intrinsic authenticity about the clandestine production and removal of the excisable goods by the appellants who had obtained the ..... officers to examine consumption of electricity when production and removal of excisable goods in a clandestine manner is established by such positive documentary evidence and the oral evidence of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 2007 (TRI)

Jaipur Golden Transport Co. Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-03-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC431

..... before the supreme court and therefore it cannot be held that the goods which are clandestinely cleared by 100 eou without permission from development commissioner are to be assessed under the ..... scheme and accordingly duty was sought to be demanded in respect of goods clandestinely removed tribunal held that clandestine removal was not established and the demand cannot be made on assumptions and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2007 (TRI)

Standard Steel Re-rolling Mills Vs. C.C.E

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-09-2007

..... revenue has challenged the findings to the commissioner appeals as regards the non intention of clandestine removal he answered in negative 5 considered the submissions made by both sides and perused ..... that there was no intention to remove the unaccounted finished goods from the factory premises clandestinely the penalty imposed on partner is unwarranted and is set aside penalty imposed on partner .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 2007 (TRI)

The Commissioner of Central Vs. M.R. Plastics and Polymers (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-17-2007

Reported in: (2007)(117)ECC229

..... central excise appeals hyderabad 2 revenue registered a case against the respondent on charges of clandestine production and removal of excisable goods the adjudicating authority in his oio no 28 ..... ble cegat held that revenue not required to prove their case with mathematical precision when clandestine removal has been established contention that from raw material brought into factory goods in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2007 (TRI)

Moontex Dyeing and Printing Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-13-2007

Reported in: (2007)(119)ECC185

..... statement i find that there are sufficient evidence in respect of alleged evasion of duty clandestine removal of the goods and the adjudicating authority have correctly passed the order 6 i ..... not indicate anything in support of the appellants case if 16 different recipients of the clandestinely removed goods voluntarily gave the statements to the authorities under section 14 there is no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2007 (TRI)

Mahalaxmi Dyg. Mills and Shri R.M. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Mar-13-2007

Reported in: (2007)(118)ECC65

..... adjudicating authority after granting a personal hearing came to the conclusion that the appellant had clandestinely removed the goods and not accounted for the inputs and semi processed goods the ..... adjudicating authority has come to the erroneous conclusion that the appellant was involved in the clandestine removals based on the records of the transporter which were also not tallying in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2007 (TRI)

Ador Welding Limited and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2007

Reported in: (2007)(120)ECC365

..... destroyed there was also an allegation that the appellants had cleared excess quantity of flux clandestinely without payment of duty it was alleged that the appellants did not reverse the modvat ..... flux consumed during extrusion and therefore it could not be alleged that the appellants had clandestinely removed ready mix dry fluxes from the factory the difference between the quantity of fluxes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //