Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: civil defence act 1968 section 14 savings as to orders Page 1 of about 3,119 results (0.124 seconds)

Bhola Rai Vs. the Superintendent, District Jail Ghazipur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1967All77; 1967CriLJ146

..... on the material placed before the central government, the central government was satisfied that with a view to preventing the petitioners from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence, public order it was necessary to detain the petitioner.' it is on these averments that the learned counsel for the petitioner ..... order of the central government reads:''whereas the central government is satisfied that with a view to preventing shri son ofsri from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence,the public safety and the maintenance of publicorder, it is necessary to make the followingorder; now, therefore, in exercise of ..... on behalf of the central government it has been asserted that it was with a view 'to preventing the petitioners from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence, public order' that they had been detained. learned counsel contends that for determining the question of the validity of the .....

Sohan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H408; 1963CriLJ320

..... ) suspects, on grounds appearing to that authority to be reasonable, of being of hostile origin or of having acted, acting, being about to act or being likely to act in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence the security of the state, the public safety or interest, the maintenance of public order, india's relations with ..... of these reports the punjab government was satisfied that it was necessary to detain the petitioner with a view to prevent him from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence. the affidavit of shri j. d. khanna also shows that reports were received by the state government that the petitioner was ..... the detention order made by the state government shows that the government is satisfied that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence it is necessary that the petitioner be detained. besides that, there is also the affidavit of shri j. d. khanna deputy .....

Harkishan Singh Surjit Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1966P& H248; 1966CriLJ690

..... magistrate) on grounds appearing to that authority to be reasonable, of being of hostile origin or of having acted, acting, being about to act or being likely to act in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence, the security of the state, the public safety or interest, the maintenance of public order, india's ..... varieties have been vested in the authorities concerned for placing restrictions on a person with a view to preventing him from acting, in any manner, prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence and other matters specified. it is for the authorities concerned to decide about the restriction which, in the circumstances of ..... swarup, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the object of detention of the petitioner was to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence and that consequently the restrictions which are placed on the petitioner should be such as are directly related to the achievement of .....

P.L. Lakhanpal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC908; [1967]1SCR433

..... authority empowered by the rule to detain suspects on grounds appearing to that authority to be reasonable of having acted, acting or being about to act or being likely to act in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence etc., or (b) with respect to whom that authority is satisfied that his detention is necessary for ..... in themselves to enable the central government to come to the conclusion that if the petitioner was not detained he was likely to act in a manner prejudicial to the defence of india, civil defence, public safety and the maintenance of public order.' in the return filed in the present petition also the same officer has once ..... the order inter alia stated : 'whereas the central government is satisfied that with a view to preventing shri p.l. lakhanpal.... from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india, and civil defence, public safety and the maintenance of public order, it is necessary that he should be detained.' 2. on december 24, 1965 he .....

Syed Hyder Abbas Raza Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1967All114; 1967CriLJ298

..... .... .... .... provided that . . . . . . . . . .14. under rule 30 the detaining authority, before passing the order directing a person to be detained, must be satisfied that he was acting in a manner prejudical to the defence of india & civil defence, the public safety, the maintenance of public order, etc. before the detaining authority can be satisfied it must apply its mind to the material before it ..... the state government, if it is satisfied with respect to any particular person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence, the public safety, the maintenance of public order, india's relations with foreign powers, the maintenance of peaceful conditions ..... as little as may be consonant with the purpose of ensuring the public safety and interest and the defence of india and civil defence.' in view of this specific provision in the act it is incumbent upon the authority which is passing an order under rule 30(1)(b) of the .....

Domino's Pizza, Inc. Vs. McDonald

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the two contested issues: that 1981 was subject to the state personal injury limitations period, id. , at 660 664, and that it violates title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 and 1981 for a union to decline to press black employees grievances under the governing collective-bargaining agreement, id. , at 669. the court often grants certiorari ..... from other circuits. ibid. we granted certiorari. 544 u. s. 998 (2005). ii among the many statutes that combat racial discrimination, 1981, originally 1 of the civil rights act of 1866, 14 stat. 27, has a specific function: it protects the equal right of [a]ll persons within the jurisdiction of the united states to make and ..... he has (or would have) rights under the existing (or proposed) contract that he wishes to make and enforce. the statute, originally enacted as 1 of the civil rights act of 1866, now protects the equal right of [a]ll persons to make and enforce contracts without respect to race, 1981(a), and defines make and enforce contracts .....

K.V. Subba Rao Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1967AP202; 1967CriLJ845

..... is bad on that ground. what has been mentioned in the order is that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence and the efficient conduct of military operations his detention has been ordered whereas in the affidavit the word 'anti-national' has been ..... government or the state government, if it is satisfied with respect to any particular person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence, the public safety, the maintenance of public order, india's relations with foreign powers, the maintenance of peaceful conditions in any part ..... with respect to the person known as shri k.v. subbarao son of sri veerayya that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence and the efficient conduct of military operations, it is necessary to make the following order:- now, therefore, in exercise of the .....

Fonseca Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. L.C. Gupta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC563; (1973)1SCC480

..... government is of opinion that any public premises as defined in the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971 (40 of 1971), are required for any purpose connected with the defence of india and civil defence, the public safely ox interest, the efficient conduct of military operations or the maintenance of supplies and ..... new delhi is a public premises as defined under the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971; andwhereas i am satisfied that the said premises are required in connection with the defence of india and civil defence; and whereas i am satisfied that you are in unauthorised occupation as defined under the public premises ..... may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.(6)...section 3 of the defence of india act empowers the central government to make such rules as appear to it necessary or expedient for securing the defence of india and civil defence, the public safety, the maintenance of public order or efficient conduct of military .....

Ram Singh Vs. State and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1968CriLJ240

..... central government or the state government, if it is satisfied with respect to any particular person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india and civil defence...it is necessary so to do, may make an order:(b) directing that he be detained.15. during the operation of the proclamation ..... .10.1962. by section 3 of the ordinance, the central government had been empowered to make rules as appear to be necessary or expedient for securing the defence of india and civil defence, public safety, etc., by notification in the official gazette. in exercise of those powers the central government promulgated the d.i.r., 1962, by notification ..... emergency issued under clause (1) of article 352 thereof on the 26th october 1962, is in force, 'if such person has been deprived of any such rights under the defence of india ordinance, 1962 (iv of 1962) or any rule or order made thereunder'. (the underlines here in ' ' are mine.in the above case the supreme .....

N.P. Nathwani Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR1

..... the trial of certain offences and for matters connected therewith. chapter ii of the parent act deals with the emergency powers and section 3 confers power to make rules. section 3(7) runs thus ..... the relevant provisions of the defence and internal security of india act viz. the parent act would not be out of place. this parent act (act no. 42 of 1971) as amended by act of 1975 mars put on the statute book with a view to provide for special measures to ensure the public safety and interest, the defence of india and civil defence and internal security and for .....