Skip to content


Civil Defence - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: civil defence Page 1 of about 6 results (0.020 seconds)
May 24 2004 (HC)

Dy. Controller, Civil Defence Vs. Mohd. Afzuallah and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2004(4)AWC3584

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The respondent Nos. 1 to 6 are the owners and landlord of a double storied building situate...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2004 (HC)

Umar Mamad Sahitya Vs. Subhash Trivedi, Dy. Director (Civil Defence)

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)2GLR967

the very question in reference to Section 197(1) of the Code has observed that :'197(1) : When any person who is respondent no.1-Subhash Trivedi, at present serving as Dy. Director (Civil Defence), Public Protection, Ahmedabad, on the relevant days of the incident

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 03 2017 (HC)

Smt Kusum Dubey Alias Kusum Kumari Alias Kushum Devi Vs. The Director ...

Court: Jharkhand

District Garhwa. Petitioner VERSUS1 The Director General of Civil Defence, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Lodhi Road, Garhwa. Petitioner VERSUS1 The Director General of Civil Defence, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Lodhi Road, P.O.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2005 (HC)

Ramesh Narayan Tripathi S/O Late Surya Narayan Tripathi and Gaya Prasa ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2005(2)ESC1057; [2005(105)FLR906]; (2005)2UPLBEC1326

Fundamental Rules do not apply to all the holders of civil post and public servants. These are as such not applicable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 2006 (HC)

i.B.P. Company Limited (Business Group (Petroleum)), (Government of In ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2006(4)AWC3465

was allowed on 10.01.2005. Against the said order the aforesaid Civil Revision No. 81 of 2005 was filed. The said revision

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 2007 (HC)

Sri Narayan S. Bhat S/O Shivaram Bhat Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR396; 2008(3)KarLJ410; 2008(2)KCCR818; 2008(2)AIRKarR316

issued by the competent authority and more over, petitioner cannot claim the continuity of service as a matter of right since

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //