Cit - Judgment Search Results
Cit Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-2008
Reported in: (2008)215CTR(Raj)315; [2008]306ITR363(Raj)
attracted liability on hypothetical income, it is an error apparent on the face of the record. The learned CIT (A) considered the matter threadbare, and found, that the controversy arose on account of change in law, and
Dy. Cit Vs. Amar Ubromal Chawla,dy. Cit V.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Dec-13-2001
Reported in: (2002)75TTJ(Nag.)405
the decision of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Ramjilal Jagannath & Ors. v. Asstt. CIT (2000) 241 ITR 758 (MP). He, therefore, urged that the impugned orders of the learned-Commissioner (Appeals) directing the
Kohli Brothers Colour Lab (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner, Income Tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-20-2010
being not maintainable. Moreover, as per the ratio laid down in the case of Satish Grain Co. v. CIT (2005) 27 NTN 354 Allahabad, no new point can be raised in review petition.6. On merit, learned Senior
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Cit Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2000
Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)739; 2000(54)DRJ380
Matched in: Parties Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Cit Delhi (Central)
Cit-23 Vs. M/s Mansukh Dyeing
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-24-2022
there is a clear distribution of assets as 4 partners have also withdrawn amounts from the capital account. CIT(A) also observed that value of the assets of the firm which commonly belonged to all the partners of
Cit Vs. M/S Meghalaya Steels Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-09-2016
in 2009 (9) SCC328 which has been followed by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Supriya Gill v. CIT (2010) 193 Taxman 12 (Himachal Pradesh). He submitted that the aforesaid judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court
Cit Vs. T.V.S. Sewing Needles Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-30-2009
Reported in: (2009)226CTR(SC)685
Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has brought to our notice the judgment passed by this Court in CIT v. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills : (2007) 294 ITR 328, wherein, in similar matters, this Court has held
Additional Cit Vs. Hcl Technologies Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2009
Reported in: [2010]188TAXMAN72(SC)
High Court had remitted the matter to the TPO from whose order an appeal was pending before the CIT(A), it would be in the interest of both sides to resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism suggested in
Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Rajkot Vs. Saurashtra Kutch Stock ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-2008
Reported in: 2008AIRSCW7153; (2008)219CTR(SC)90; 2008(230)ELT385(SC); JT2008(10)SC306; 2008(12)SCALE582; (2009)11VatReporter19
Hiralal Bhagwati has been approved by this Court recently in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat v. Surat City Gymjkhana, Civil Appeal Nos. 4305-06 of 2002; decided on March 04, 2008. It was, therefore, submitted that there
Deputy Commissioner, Income Tax, Baroda Vs. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-08-2008
Reported in: (2008)215CTR(SC)10; [2008]299ITR85(SC); 2008(2)SCALE336; (2008)2SCC475; 2008AIRSCW1287
appeals which are as follow:(1) Whether 'commitment charges' can be allowed as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?(2) Whether 'charges' paid to COFACE is similar to payment of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) of the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free