Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cit - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 2008

Cit Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-23-2008

Reported in: (2008)215CTR(Raj)315; [2008]306ITR363(Raj)

attracted liability on hypothetical income, it is an error apparent on the face of the record. The learned CIT (A) considered the matter threadbare, and found, that the controversy arose on account of change in law, and


Dec 13 2001

Dy. Cit Vs. Amar Ubromal Chawla,dy. Cit V.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Decided on: Dec-13-2001

Reported in: (2002)75TTJ(Nag.)405

the decision of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Ramjilal Jagannath & Ors. v. Asstt. CIT (2000) 241 ITR 758 (MP). He, therefore, urged that the impugned orders of the learned-Commissioner (Appeals) directing the


May 20 2010

Kohli Brothers Colour Lab (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner, Income Tax

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-20-2010

being not maintainable. Moreover, as per the ratio laid down in the case of Satish Grain Co. v. CIT (2005) 27 NTN 354 Allahabad, no new point can be raised in review petition.6. On merit, learned Senior


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 2000

Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Cit Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-16-2000

Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)739; 2000(54)DRJ380

Matched in: Parties Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Cit Delhi (Central)


Nov 24 2022

Cit-23 Vs. M/s Mansukh Dyeing

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-24-2022

there is a clear distribution of assets as 4 partners have also withdrawn amounts from the capital account. CIT(A) also observed that value of the assets of the firm which commonly belonged to all the partners of


Mar 09 2016

Cit Vs. M/S Meghalaya Steels Ltd

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-09-2016

in 2009 (9) SCC328 which has been followed by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Supriya Gill v. CIT (2010) 193 Taxman 12 (Himachal Pradesh). He submitted that the aforesaid judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court


Jan 30 2009

Cit Vs. T.V.S. Sewing Needles Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-30-2009

Reported in: (2009)226CTR(SC)685

Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has brought to our notice the judgment passed by this Court in CIT v. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills : (2007) 294 ITR 328, wherein, in similar matters, this Court has held


Aug 17 2009

Additional Cit Vs. Hcl Technologies Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-17-2009

Reported in: [2010]188TAXMAN72(SC)

High Court had remitted the matter to the TPO from whose order an appeal was pending before the CIT(A), it would be in the interest of both sides to resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism suggested in


Sep 15 2008

Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Rajkot Vs. Saurashtra Kutch Stock ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-15-2008

Reported in: 2008AIRSCW7153; (2008)219CTR(SC)90; 2008(230)ELT385(SC); JT2008(10)SC306; 2008(12)SCALE582; (2009)11VatReporter19

Hiralal Bhagwati has been approved by this Court recently in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat v. Surat City Gymjkhana, Civil Appeal Nos. 4305-06 of 2002; decided on March 04, 2008. It was, therefore, submitted that there


Feb 08 2008

Deputy Commissioner, Income Tax, Baroda Vs. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-08-2008

Reported in: (2008)215CTR(SC)10; [2008]299ITR85(SC); 2008(2)SCALE336; (2008)2SCC475; 2008AIRSCW1287

appeals which are as follow:(1) Whether 'commitment charges' can be allowed as deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?(2) Whether 'charges' paid to COFACE is similar to payment of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) of the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial