Skip to content


Chilli - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: chilli Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 13,043 results (0.143 seconds)
Mar 06 2002 (HC)

Ram Kishore Meena and Madhu Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Rajasthan and a ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-06-2002

Reported in: 2002(3)WLC26

calla j 1 admit issue notice to the respondents mr ajay purohit govt advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 2002 (HC)

Rukmani T. Bhagat (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-12-2002

Reported in: RLW2003(4)Raj2401; 2002(4)WLC496

calla j 1 a letter was sent by registered post local on 12th february 2001 by the petitioner smt rukmani...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2002 (HC)

Nirmal Chandra Saini Vs. State and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj796; 2002(3)WLC402

calla j 1 this special appeal under section 18 of the rajasthan highcourt ordinance is directed against the judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 2002 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Ajay Sharma

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-16-2002

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1070; 2002(3)WLC187; 2002(5)WLN180

calla j 1 respondent herein was given an appointment on compassionate ground under the provisions of the recruitment of dependents...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 2002 (HC)

Jeth Mal Purohit Vs. R.H.C. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-24-2002

Reported in: RLW2003(4)Raj2376; 2003(1)WLC66; 2002(5)WLN500

calla j 1 the petitioner herein came with the case that he was appointed as ldc on the establishment of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2002 (SC)

Om Prakash @ Raja Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-05-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD(Cri)84; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)210; 2003CriLJ483; JT2002(10)SC186; (2003)1SCC648; 2003(1)LC317(SC)

p venkatarama reddi j 1 the appellant accused was working as a domestic servant in the house of retired brigadier...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 2002 (HC)

N.S. Ramanathan and N.R. Panchamirtha Iyer Vs. N. Krishnamoorthy Iyer ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-01-2002

Reported in: AIR2003Mad78

..... letter dated 24 10 1971 you have stated that 8 marakkals of chilli was harvested by you during march 1971 there were number of trees ..... in january 1971 i approached your elder brother for permission to raise chilly crop as i had arranged to raise a similar crop on the ..... your client was not available and as the season for raising the chilly crop was closing i have raised the crop i am in possession .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2002 (HC)

Parmeshwari Dayal Saxena Vs. Basic Shiksha Parishad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-11-2002

Reported in: 2002(1)AWC817; [2002(93)FLR492]; (2002)2UPLBEC1398

..... and order dated 17 5 1977 passed by manager secretary of bundelkhand purva madhyamik vidyalaya chilli rath hamirpur by which petitioner s services were terminated 3 the facts giving rise to ..... petition are stated as under petitioner was appointed as headmaster of bundelkhand purva madhyamik vidyalaya chilli rath hamirpur on 6 7 1972 his services were alleged to have been confirmed on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 2002 (HC)

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hidkal Dam Project Vs. L.B. Desa ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-11-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)KarLJ257

..... to have been under groundnut cultivation some of them are supposed to have boon under chillies cultivation and the wetlands were supposed to have been yielding sugarcane in addition to this ..... in one portion of the dry lands groundnuts were being cultivated in the second portion chillies were being cultivated and as far as the wetlands are concerned that they were under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2002 (HC)

Manoharan G. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-20-2002

Reported in: 2002(4)ALD122; 2006(3)ALT76; (2002)IIILLJ270AP

..... explanation the first irregularity was sanctioning cash credits to two sister concerns namely s v chillies trading company and vignayeswara trading company beyond the sanctioned limits the second irregularity was that ..... bank it is submitted that all the cash credits given by him to s v chillies trading company and vignayeswara tradingcompany beyond his discretionary powers were ratified by the 3rd .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //