Certainly - Judgment Search Results

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

42 u s c 1973c 60 days i t is certainly reasonable to believe that congress having placed a strict time

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. Moran Mar Mar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2001; JT1995(5)SC1; 1995(4)SCALE1; 1995Supp(4)SCC286; [1995]Supp1SCR542

..... thus maintainable the injunction and prohibition sought from interfering in administration of church are certainly matters which pertain to the religious office even the declaration that the church is ..... dionysius became the malankara metropolitan on the death of mar joseph dionysius because of certain differences arising between mar geevarghese dionysius and abdulla ii the latter ex communicated the .....

Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Reserve ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1996]85CompCas808(Cal)

period is only 5 1 2 years companies like peerless certainly cannnot have legal rights to take advantage of the ignorance

Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1236; JT1995(2)SC110; 1995(1)SCALE539; (1995)2SCC161; [1995]1SCR1036

has given rise to powerful media empires which development is certainly not conducive to free speech right of the citizens 3

Murarilal Ramdeo Agarwal Vs. Firm Ganeshilal Gulabchand Naila

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(0)MPLJ1031

..... rent fixed even in a case of contractual rent a tenant certainly file an application before the rent controlling authority for getting the ..... authority came into existence the order of the rent controlling authority certainly gave a right in favour of the tenant declaring that he ..... eviction would be ordered under the special law a tenant will certainly have the right to defend the matter and even at the .....

R.K. Malhotra and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)15; 1995(35)DRJ100

behind the permission and seek to question it it is certainly not open to a company whose shares have been purchased

M/S. Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. Coca Cola Company and Ot ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2372; 1995(2)ARBLR249(SC); [1995]84CompCas618(SC); JT1995(6)SC3; (1996)1MLJ15(SC); 1995(4)SCALE635; (1995)5SCC545; [1995]Supp2SCR514; 1995(2)LC698(SC)

orders c agrawal j 1 special leave granted 2 in the past nations often went to war for the protection...

Shramik Uttarsh Sabha Vs. Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1137; [1995(70)FLR884]; JT1995(2)SC284; 1995LabIC1591; (1995)IILLJ301SC; 1995(1)SCALE533; (1995)3SCC78; [1995]1SCR967; 1995(1)LC522(SC)

orders p bharucha j 1 delay condoned 2 leave granted 3 the question for consideration in this appeal is does...

Manohar Joshi Vs. NitIn Bhaurao Patil and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)93; AIR1996SC796; JT1995(8)SC646; 1995(7)SCALE30; (1996)1SCC169; [1995]Supp6SCR421

orderj s verma j 1 this is an appeal under section 116a of the representation of the people act 1951...

United Receland Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1996)114PLR227

to a strange and unusual prohibition against retrospective legislation must certainly lie upon those who assert it there is nothing in