Ceramic - Year 2000 - Judgments

Aug 03 2000 (HC)

Krishna Ceramics and Refractories Vs. Dr. V.S. Krishna Ceramics and Po ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-03-2000

Reported in: 2000(5)ALD1; 2000(4)ALT631

..... he is the sole proprietor of the suit property consisting of a ceramic factory existing on a total extent of ac 11 23 cents ..... lease is only for industrial purpose i e for the manufacture of ceramics and therefore lease cannot be termed as an agricultural lease and the ..... non agricultural purpose admittedly the lease was meant for the manufacture of ceramics both in ex a1 and ex b1 there is no mention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 2000 (HC)

Kajaria Ceramics Limited Vs. Trade Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-13-2000

Reported in: [2000]119STC117(All)

..... tax tribunal lucknow in second appeal no 73 of 1996 kajaria ceramics ltd v divisional level committee the appeal was partly allowed and ..... be pleased to direct that revision no 700 of 1997 kajaria ceramics ltd v trade tax tribunal pending in the high court of ..... and parts of the districts of uttar pradesh the dealer kajaria ceramics limited was granted eligibility certificate for a period of 6 years .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 2000 (TRI)

Ntb Hitech Ceramics Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-28-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT200Tri(Mum.)bai

..... department has taken the view that they are correctly classifiable as ceramic articles under heading 69 01 2 in the impugned order the ..... the goods are specifically mentioned in heading 69 01 which includes ceramic articles this he finds more specific than heading 85 15 ..... of this chapter remain classified here even if they are of ceramic material or glass with the exception of glass envelopes including .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2000 (HC)

Krishna Ceramics and Refractories, Rajahmundry Vs. K.V. Narayana and O ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-26-2000

Reported in: 2000(4)ALD121; 2000(3)ALT562

..... has taken over the leasehold interest in respect of the manufacture of ceramics and potteries and fire bricks etc the plaintiff had a lease ..... 16 6 1978 to 15 6 1983 the leasehold being the ceramic factory for the purpose of manufacturing the plaintiff had the mining ..... the clay and use the same for the purpose of manufacture of ceramics bricks etc accordingly the defendant no 1 carried on the said .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2000 (HC)

Gmb Ceramics Limited Vs. Neycer India Limited

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-28-2000

Reported in: (2002)1CALLT150(HC),2001(1)CHN28

..... pleased to deliver a judgment being matter no 836 of 1990 g m b ceramics ltd v neiveli ceramics and refractories ltd 7 in the said application it appears that a point ..... his lordship amitava lala j in a p no 370 of 1997 g m b ceramics limited v neycer india limited and drew my attention to the said judgment and his .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sompura Ceramics

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2000

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC567

..... the department has chosen to file only one appeal against the appellants m s sompura ceramics subsequently appeals were filed against those four units but same were dismissed as barred by ..... made by both sides show cause notices were issued to the appellants m s sompura ceramics and partners of other units on the charge of clubbing of clearances there is some .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2000 (TRI)

Bell Ceramics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-06-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT396Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the pre deposit this was done 2 the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of ceramic tiles falling under chapter heading 6906 10 of the central excise tariff act they were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2000 (TRI)

Orient Ceramics (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-10-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT528TriDel

..... the appellants who are a company registered under the companies act 1966 are manufacturers of ceramic glazed tiles at plot no 8 industrial area sikandra bad up in 1997 the appellants .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 2000 (TRI)