Centralizing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: centralizing Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 934 results (0.025 seconds)Central Power Distribution Co. and ors. Vs. Central Electricity Regula ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC2912; 2007(2)BLJR2461; JT2007(10)SC238; 2007(10)SCALE72; (2007)8SCC197
..... beneficiaries generating stations in different region cannot be inferred from the above that the central commission had rejected the concept of abt for single state beneficiary generation stations ..... is accordingly dismissed no costs electricity introduction of availability base tariff abt jurisdiction of central electricity regulatory commission cerc questioned section 79 1 a of the electricity act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayanti Food Processing (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, R ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-22-2007
Reported in: 2007(121)ECC1; JT2007(10)SC327; (2007)8SCC34; [2007]10STT375; 2007(2)LC1002(SC)
..... no order as to costs excise valuation interpretation of sections 4 and 4a of the central excise act 1944 excisable goods ice creams chocolate telephone instruments refrigerators bottled mineral water ..... standards of weights measures packaged commodities rules 1977 rule 2 g assessment of duty under central excise act valuation of excisable goods reference in retail price assessee manufacturer of ice .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi), Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Financ ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)KarLJ210; 2007(4)KCCR2159; 2007(3)AIRKarR26(DB)
..... the respondent filed o a no 373 2005 before the central administrative tribunal bangalore bench questioning the decision of the ..... in the above terms service transfer policy respondent working as central excise officer requested for his transfer to another city where ..... and slow to interfere with administrative orders 373 20o5 the central administrative tribunal bangalore bench in its order dated 1 2 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpan Diagnostics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-30-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)BLJR1690; 2007(118)ECC79; 2007LC79(SC); 2007(211)ELT521(SC); JT2007(6)SC355; 2007(6)SCALE435
..... classification of pregnancy test kits chapter heading 30 02 and chapter heading 38 22 of central excise tariff act assessee classified its pregnancy test kits ptks for assessment purpose under chapter ..... excise classification of diagnostic reagents chapter heading 30 02 and chapter heading 38 22 of central excise tariff act assessee classified its products items 1 to 15 in annexure b diagnostic .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManagement of Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Vs. Secret ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-23-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)BLJR1708; [2007(114)FLR236]; [2008(2)JCR130(SC)]; JT2007(5)SC628; (2007)IILLJ724SC; 2007(6)SCALE45; (2007)4SCC669; 2007AIRSCW2688;
..... the case of the appellant bank that the coimbatore district central bank employees association union for short gave a strike notice ..... and illegal and it appears that the regional labour commissioner central dhanbad agreed with this view of the appellant it was ..... he was the mastermind of the plan p approached the central administrative tribunal the tribunal modified the punishment on the ground .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Enterprises Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-02-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR493(Jhr)]
..... learned counsel appearing for the assessee assailed the impugned orders passed by the commissioner of central excise and cegat as being illegal and wholly without jurisdiction learned counsel submitted that ..... in respect of notified goods 1 notwithstanding anything contained in section 3 where the central government having regard to the nature of the process of manufacture or production of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri. M. Sundareswaran Vs. the State of Maharashtra and
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-20-2007
Reported in: (2007)109BOMLR2192
..... of no importance the council is the authority constituted under the central act with the responsibility of maintaining education standards and judging ..... has to be in conformity with the directives issued by the central body while the state grants its approval and university its ..... been laid down in the condition of approval granted by the central authority or council what is most important is that all .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNovamet Industries (a 100% Export Oriented Unit), Vs. Union of India ( ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-06-2007
Reported in: 2008(227)ELT363(All); 2009[13]STR108
..... stated that the petitioners required mainly the print out of the data from the four central processing unit cpu of the computers that was specifically referred and made the basis of ..... solicitor general submitted that the petitioners have a remedy to file an appeal to the central excise service tribunal and that when an alternative remedy is available this court should not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Airport Employees Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Mi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-20-2007
Reported in: (2008)IIILLJ20Bom
..... 4 the petitioner union pursued the matter before the authority and the assistant labour commissioner central mumbai submitted a failure report under section 12 4 of the industrial disputes act 1947 ..... without any purpose or of no importance the council is the authority constituted under the central act with the responsibility of maintaining education standards and judging upon the infra structure and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.M. Rubber Company Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. the Unio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2007
Reported in: 2007(116)ECC508; 2007LC508(Madras)
..... are selling the goods at uniform price on declaration to the central excise department in proper form on 29 11 1985 the ..... the dealers of the petitioner the second respondent the commissioner of central excise chennai after adjudication by giving a personal hearing to the ..... of its dealers has initiated proceedings under the provisions of the central excise act and an adjudicated order has been passed 8 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial