Centralized - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Vs. Central Provinces Railway ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1979)9CTR(Bom)247; [1979]119ITR161(Bom)

..... section 147 b of the income tax act 1961 2 the central provinces railway company limited the assessee is a public limited ..... managed company by a special resolution and also approval of the central government the assessee company thereafter convened an extraordinary general meeting ..... of the company by a special resolution nor approval of the central government was necessary for granting of a loan by a .....

Bengal Credit Corporation Vs. Central Bank of India

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1978Cal567

..... e is set out as follows under certificate of postingduplicate the central bank of india limited registered office mahatma gandhi road bombay 1 ..... the witness said that there was a loan account with the central bank of india wherefrom certain amounts were withdrawn from time to ..... told my lord that you had stated to the agent of central bank that after squaring up the accounts of the other two .....

P. K. Pehuja Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1978)7CTR(All)414

..... which were recorded to sustain this order reliance has been placed on ajantha industries vs central board of direct taxes where the supreme court held that the requirement of recording reasons ..... satish chandra c j the central board of direct taxes passed an order dated 19th july 1975 purporting to be under .....

M.A.E.K.K. Varma and ors. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1981]129ITR31(AP)

..... industries v cbdt 1976 102itr281 sc has no application that was a case where the central board proposed the transfer of the case of an assessee from the file of the .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Central India Industries Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1978]113ITR326(Cal)

sabyasachi mukharji j 1 we are concerned in this reference with the assessment year 1960 61 the relevant previous year...

Talchar Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1978Cal449

monjula bose j 1 the plaintiff s case in the plaint is shortly as follows by an agreement dated oct...

Mohammed Abdul Sathar Sait Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1979]120ITR653(Ker)

subramonian potti j 1 one haji hasan yacoob sait expired on march 31 1962 and the petitioner is one of...

Central Machine Tool Institute, Bangalore Vs. Asst. Labour Commissione ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1979(38)FLR158]; (1979)ILLJ192Kant

..... case of the petitioner the petitioner is this writ petition is the management of the central machine tool institute situate in bangalore it is society registered under the karnataka societies ..... undoubtedly indicate that the institute is run mainly by the financial grants made by the central government and that internal resources received through sales of prototypes or designs or technical knowhow .....

Central Coal Washery Vs. Workmen and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1424; [1978(37)FLR138]; 1978LabIC1252; (1978)IILLJ350SC; (1978)3SCC332; [1978]3SCR1023; 1978(10)LC598(SC)

..... of these three coal washeries was vested in the hands of the central coal washeries organisation which was set up as an independent organisation ..... act and therefore it could not be taken over by the central government under s 3 of the act it was contended that ..... society although according to the proviso to s 2c 1 the central government may by a gazette notification exempt from the operation of .....

Central Illinois Pub. Svc. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s c 3401 a i the facts are not in any real dispute petitioner central illinois public service company company is a regulated public utility engaged in downstate illinois in ..... 435 u s 21 1978 u s supreme court central illinois pub svc co v united states 435 u s 21 1978 central illinois public service co v united states no 76 .....