Central Silk Board Amendment Act 2006 Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Nath Bros Exim. International Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)1025; AIR1997Delhi383; 67(1997)DLT458

the section or chapter notes of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 as amounting to manufacture and the ministry of textiles administrative controlling exports of textile garments central silk board incorporated under the central silk board act inspecting silk of textiles administrative controlling exports of textile garments central silk board incorporated under the central silk board act inspecting silk garments modification of the assessment 11 the object of the 1973 amendment inserting section 5a aforesaid as can be gathered from the of clauses ca and da of section 2 of the act and not on the textiles products which are manufactured by by way of duty of excise has been imposed sub section 1 provides that there shall be levied and collected as which learned counsel for the parties have based their arguments 8 the act as stated in the long preamble has been

Gowri Industries Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR3153; 1993(4)KarLJ604

which are manufactured under the grant of licence from the central government 25 it is unnecessary to go into the contention of silk worm seeds cocoons in view of the central silk board act the silk industry came under the control of court in indian aluminium co ltd and anr karnataka electricity board and ors 1992 3scr213 the supreme court affirmed the decision distribution act 1959 were challenged in the said case these amendments imposed on the production supply distribution and sale of silk to price fixation in specific terms the scheme of the act is to lay down broadly the manner of exercising the disabling provision no exclusive power is created and vested by section 18 g the intention evinced by the parliament is an answer is that the enumeration of intoxicating liquor in entry 8 list ii confers exclusive power to the state to legislate

H.N. Nanje Gowda Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR1649; 1996(3)KarLJ39

in any way be infringement of the power of the central government at all therefore by no stretch of imagination we decision the supreme court was examining the validity of karnataka silkworm seeds cocoons regulation of production supply and distribution amendment act to the preamble definition clauses and the functions of the board under the act it is contended that we should not of list iii which referred to compensation by constitution 7th amendment under entry 42 list ml acquisition and requisition of property airport cannot be an industry for the purpose of the act and therefore the order acquiring land for the purpose of proper for the courts to interfere with the legislative judgment section 28 clearly provides compensation to acquire land as provided under extent of land in all a total extent of 8 848 acres a notification under section 28 of the act has

Murari Lal Agrawal and Sons Vs. the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1971All1; [1971]27STC402(All)

central sales tax act was as an agent of the central government it was by sub section 4 of section 9 to be examined is whether school run by the cantonment board could be said to be one run by any such sales tax amendment ordinance 1969 and the central sales tax amendment act 1969 hereinafter referred to as the amend ment act the other consequently he held that the central sales tax act did not offend article 301 as none of its provisions the constitution of india cantonments act c a no 41 2006 section 346 cantonment fund servants rules 1937 rules 13 14 period of limitation and not because of the enactment of section 6 1 a section 6 1 a applies equally to which authorises the state government notwithstanding anything contained in section 8 in the public interest to waive tax or impose tax

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

of the manufacturing process are j marcel furriers ltd supra central india machinery manufacturing company ltd supra norman wright builders ltd the above orders of the government of india and the board of central excise contended that the same reasoning would hold of article 366 of the constitution as well as the amendments made by the state legislatures were challenged in builders association 29 sub section 29 of section 65 of the finance act 1994 defines what is commissioning and installation agency providing services 5152 of 2014 arising out of slp c no 5377 2006 with civil appeal no 5153 of 2014 arising out of senior counsel for the petitioner lastly made reference to sub sections 29 39 a and sub clause zzd to sub section 440 2012 441 2012 156 2013 533 2013 403 2012 824 2013 428 2009 1046 2013 1047 2013 1048 2013 1049

Hostetter Vs. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

liquors idlewild accepts orders only from travelers whose tickets and boarding cards indicate their imminent departure a customer gets nothing but s j res 211 72d cong 2d sess the proposed amendment provided in section 2 the transportation or importation into any the constitution and under the supremacy clause to the tariff act of 1930 under which the bureau of customs had approved be denied control of liquor traffic within the state opposed section 3 because it would defeat the proposed amendment s purpose idlewild bon voyage liquor corp v bicks 368 u s 812 this court holding that a three judge court should have

Property Owners Association Vs. State Of Maharashtra .

Court : Supreme Court of India

coal mines and coal mining in the hands of the central government and its agencies such as the appellant therein it slum areas pre existing laws such as the bombay housing board act 1948 the madhya pradesh housing board act 1950 the these would include all the natural resources minerals etc this amendment was turned down by the assembly dr ambedkar while denying aimed at securing social and economic freedoms by appropriate state action they are the social conscience of the constitution they are intellectuals forum v state of a p 2006 3 scc549 2006 insc101 vedanta limited v state of tamil nadu 2024 insc175 broader challenge the petitioners in minerva mills also separately challenged section 4 of the forty second amendment on the ground that advanced law lexicon 3rd edition vol iii 144 ranganatha reddy 81 page 178 of 193 part d fall within the ambit

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

act and explanation if any given to it by the central government 195 other sums 1 any person responsible for paying constituted but the state government claims that the state electricity board did not elect to purchase the undertaking for this purpose of the copyright act as it stood prior to the amendment in 2012 the learned single judge then went on to upon applying section 9 1 vi of the income tax act found that what was in fact transferred in the transaction 3402 2017 slp c no 450 2019 c a no 2006 2019 4 this category includes c a nos 8737 8941 act we need to give weightage to those words further section 195 uses the word payer and not the word assessee appeal no 10103 of2013civil appeal no 10104 of2013civil appeal no 8960 of2018civil appeal no 8966 of2018civil appeal no 8958 of2018civil appeal

Shapiro Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

1945 91 cong rec a5419 on april 25 1939 the central statistical board reported that since the end of 1933 the statistical board reported that since the end of 1933 the board has reviewed in advance of dissemination more than 4 600 tend to incriminate him and claimed privilege under the fifth amendment on review in this court of the judgment committing him action in rem for the forfeiture of merchandise in which action the claimants had voluntarily intervened it argued that in a entire 202 because a previously adopted amendment had made the section redundant 87 cong rec 9232 9233 the previously adopted amendment customarily kept 14 b of maximum price regulation no 426 8 fed reg 9546 as a practical matter therefore the statute

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

2007 etc page 169 of 241 interpretation when once the central government has the powers under section 18g of the idra in tika ramji indian aluminium company limited vs karnataka electricity board 1992 3 scc580 indian aluminium company shree krishna gyanoday sugar assigned to it in various enactments including the 134 18th amendment to the us constitution section 1 after one year from beverage prominently ran through the main provisions of the various acts of this country as well as america and england relating also be made to the food safety and standards act 2006 fssa 2006 which has been enacted pursuant to entry 52 no 151 of 2007 etc page 190 of 241 which section 18g applies this is by bearing in mind the twin my opinion the words intoxicating liquors itself explains that entry 8 list ii does not seek to travel beyond intoxicating liquors