Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central industrial security force act 1968 section 2 definitions Sorted by: old Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 157 results (0.125 seconds)

Mar 20 2002 (HC)

Mohinder Singh Malik and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ73

..... are that appellant/writ-petitioner joined as deputy superintendent of police, later designated as assistant commandant in the border security force, pursuant to his selection on the basis of a combined test held of the said post in various organisations of armed forces including central industrial security force. appellant at the relevant time was holding the post of commandant. it was for the first time in 1978 ..... by a notification issued by the ministry of home ministry of home affairs, g.s.r. 1462 dated 9.12.1978, border security force (seniority, promotion and superannuation officers) rules, 1978 were promulgated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2008 (HC)

Bari Brahmana Industries Asso and anr. Vs. Power Development Deptt., a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ464

..... region in the state, which consumes 63% of the total available power, is poor at 30% and that too mainly from the government departments and security forces. contrary thereto from the power available is only 37% against the revenue contribution of 70%.36. on the basis of the aforesaid figures, it was asserted ..... determined by it, and approved the same. separate tariff has been approved for domestic supply/non-domestic and commercial supply, supply to state and central government departments and industrial supply etc. in this regard, the commission has kept in mind the character of service provided to each and every one by the utility, ..... of various wings, who are the consumers of energy to show an increasing trend. they are domestic consumers, non-domestic consumers/commercial consumers, industrial consumers and agricultural consumers, central and state government undertakings, public lighting and phe and army supply. the charge supplied in the case reveals that the level of consumption of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2008 (HC)

Abdul Gani Sofi and ors. Vs. Haj Committee and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2009J& K40

..... to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this court.7. respondent no. 3 in the reply has stated that the petitioner is a released militant, was asserted by security forces on 27-2-1993 in case fir no. 3/1993 of police station cik. petitioner is a local trained militant of hizbul mujahideen outfit, has also ..... remained under preventive detention for a period of six months. furthermore, petitioner was holding post of supervisor in the jammu and kashmir state industries department, for anti-national activities, was dismissed from service.8. no doubt respondent no. 3 (cid agency) has made reference to the case registered as fir ..... of the religion. every able bodied muslim is religiously duty bound to make the pilgrimage to mecca at least once in the lifetime subject to affordability. committee (central haj committee) and the state committee (state haj committee) in terms of the provisions of the haj committee act, 2002 have been established for facilitating/ making .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Vs. U.O.i. and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... :18. feb. 2011 order in pursuance o the proviso of sub-rule (2) of rule 25 of the central industrial security force rules 2001, i ajit singh, 2 commandant, cisf unit, mbpt mumbai hereby terminate forthwith the services of no. 092301092 constable suresh kumar of cisf unit, mbpt ..... service vide order dated 18.02.2011 issued by the commandant, cisf unit, mbpt mumbai. the said order is taken note of: office of the commandant central industrial security force (ministry of home affairs) mumbai port trust huges dry dock building indira dock, bllard estate mumbai-400001 no:-5014/cisf/mbpt(m)/disc/sk./2011-529 dated ..... to appreciate the contention raised at the bar, it is deemed appropriate to take note of rule 25 of the central industrial security force rules, 2001 (for short rules of 2001): 25. probation. (1)every member of the force except those appointed on deputation/absorption, shall be on probation for the period specified in relevant column of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 2012 (HC)

Om Parkash Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... hazaribagh, bihar, that claimed precious lives of two central industrial security force personnel.2. the central industrial security force is an armed force of the union constituted for better protection and security of industrial 2 undertakings owned by the central government. the appellant enrolled as constable in the force and his three colleagues namely, constable kartar singh, ..... appellant was guilty of negligence towards his duty. the writ court is said to have failed to appreciate that rule 31 of the central industrial security force rules, 1969 was flouted by the respondents while passing the impugned orders. the writ court, according to the appellant, erroneously refused ..... .7. the appellant filed an appeal against the order of commandant, cisf unit, ptps, patratu, hazaribagh, bihar before deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, patna, bihar. the appellate authority did not find any merit in the appeal and the appeal was, accordingly, dismissed on 08.09. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1958 (HC)

Rehman Shagoo and ors. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1958CriLJ885

..... . ghulam ganai, sidiq sheikh, sheer abdul aziz, fazal din abdul hamid kara, peerzada ali shah, mohd, amin nehvi, ghulam mohiuddin zargar at present in judicial lock-up central jail srinagar praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus to the state of jammu and kashmir not to enforce the enemy agents ordinance being void against the petitioners ..... act which is designed or likely to give assistance to the military or air operations of the enemy or to impede the military or air operations of indian forces or the forces of any indian state or to endanger life or is guilty of incendiarism shall be punishable with death or rigorous imprisonment for life or with rigorous imprisonment ..... ordinance, sections 3, 4 and 5 of the explosive substances act and section 120-b of the ranbir penal code, section 29 of the public security act and rules 28/32 of the public security rules in the court of special judge, srinagar, who has been appointed as such by notification no. 1 of 1st october, 1957, by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1958 (HC)

Kashyap Bandhu Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1959CriLJ709

..... been detained not for any ulterior purposes but purely in the public interest as the government were satisfied that the activities of the petitioned were calculated to undermine the security of the state. the insinuations made in para 16 by the petitioner that his detention was actuated by reasons of personal animosity towards him on the part of ..... of detention. he has made an endorsement that he read over the order of detention to shree kashyap bandhu and the detenue was handed over to the superintendent of central jail, srinagar. in his affidavit mr. hashia has stated that he read over the order of detention to the petitioner and showed the same to him, in ..... from which he has received information shows that he has consulted the concerned persons against whom allegations are made by the petitioner. wo, therefore, do not see any force in this contention as well.29. in the result we are not prepared to interfere with the detention order against the petitioner and reject this petition.k.v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1963 (HC)

Sachdev Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1964CriLJ337

..... conferred dy clause (1) of article 352 pf the constitution, i, sarvapaiii raanaknsnnan, president; of india, dy this proclamation declare that grave emergency exists whereby the security of india is threatened by external aggression.s. radhakrishnan,president.it is established by the affidavit of respondent no. 2 that headquarters 133 works engineers is engaged in ..... of the said act and the notification scuds thereunder, section 9, army act, reads as under:notwithstanding anything contained in clause (i) of section 3, the central government may, dy notification, declare that any person or class of persons subject to tills act shall, with reference to any area in which they may be serving ..... high court, kartar singh v. imperator, reported air 1946 lah 103 (fb) wherein it has then field:a military store-keeper attached to or employed wan military forces raised in british india marts, by forest of ordinance row. 10(x) of 1941 be deemed to be on active service for the purposes of the indian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1966 (HC)

Farooqi (M.S.) Vs. Anti-corruption Commission (by Chairman and Members ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ78J& K

..... service' to meanthe service known as the indian administrative service or the service known as the indian police service.sub-section (1) of section 3 provides:the central government may, after consultation with the governments of the states concerned including the state of jammu and kashmir, make rules for the regulation of recruitment, and the ..... hereinafter), pro vides that the commission constituted under section 5 shall have the powers of the high court under any law for the time being in force in respect of the matters which are enumerated in that section and it is contended that as the commission is invested with powers of the high court ..... amenable to the jammu and kashmir government servants' prevention of corruption (commission) act, 1962, and the prevention of the corruption act, pvt. 2006, which are in force in the state. the procedure under the jammu and kashmir servants' prevention of corruption (commission) act, 1962, is elaborate and substantially the same as under all india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1967 (HC)

Kotwal (T.C.) Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ780J& K

..... high court to effectuate a purpose, namely, the securing of independence of the subordinate judiciary and unless it included disciplinary control as well, the very object would be frustrated. this aid to construction is admissible because to ..... term of are because the civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules used the word 'control' and the only rules which can legitimately come under the word 'central' are the disciplinary rules. further, as we have already shown, the history which lies behind the enactment of these articles indicates that 'control' was vested in the ..... it has the some status as that of the high court and no writ would lie against an order of respondent 2. this contention is devoid of force and must be rejected. under section 9 of the aforesaid act the anti-corruption commission has been given powers of this court in regard to curtain matters .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //