Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central industrial security force act 1968 section 2 definitions Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 157 results (0.240 seconds)

Om Parkash Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... hazaribagh, bihar, that claimed precious lives of two central industrial security force personnel.2. the central industrial security force is an armed force of the union constituted for better protection and security of industrial 2 undertakings owned by the central government. the appellant enrolled as constable in the force and his three colleagues namely, constable kartar singh, ..... appellant was guilty of negligence towards his duty. the writ court is said to have failed to appreciate that rule 31 of the central industrial security force rules, 1969 was flouted by the respondents while passing the impugned orders. the writ court, according to the appellant, erroneously refused ..... .7. the appellant filed an appeal against the order of commandant, cisf unit, ptps, patratu, hazaribagh, bihar before deputy inspector general, central industrial security force, patna, bihar. the appellate authority did not find any merit in the appeal and the appeal was, accordingly, dismissed on 08.09. .....

Mohinder Singh Malik and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ73

..... are that appellant/writ-petitioner joined as deputy superintendent of police, later designated as assistant commandant in the border security force, pursuant to his selection on the basis of a combined test held of the said post in various organisations of armed forces including central industrial security force. appellant at the relevant time was holding the post of commandant. it was for the first time in 1978 ..... by a notification issued by the ministry of home ministry of home affairs, g.s.r. 1462 dated 9.12.1978, border security force (seniority, promotion and superannuation officers) rules, 1978 were promulgated .....

Suresh Kumar Vs. U.O.i. and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... :18. feb. 2011 order in pursuance o the proviso of sub-rule (2) of rule 25 of the central industrial security force rules 2001, i ajit singh, 2 commandant, cisf unit, mbpt mumbai hereby terminate forthwith the services of no. 092301092 constable suresh kumar of cisf unit, mbpt ..... service vide order dated 18.02.2011 issued by the commandant, cisf unit, mbpt mumbai. the said order is taken note of: office of the commandant central industrial security force (ministry of home affairs) mumbai port trust huges dry dock building indira dock, bllard estate mumbai-400001 no:-5014/cisf/mbpt(m)/disc/sk./2011-529 dated ..... to appreciate the contention raised at the bar, it is deemed appropriate to take note of rule 25 of the central industrial security force rules, 2001 (for short rules of 2001): 25. probation. (1)every member of the force except those appointed on deputation/absorption, shall be on probation for the period specified in relevant column of the .....

Bari Brahmana Industries Asso and anr. Vs. Power Development Deptt., a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ464

..... region in the state, which consumes 63% of the total available power, is poor at 30% and that too mainly from the government departments and security forces. contrary thereto from the power available is only 37% against the revenue contribution of 70%.36. on the basis of the aforesaid figures, it was asserted ..... determined by it, and approved the same. separate tariff has been approved for domestic supply/non-domestic and commercial supply, supply to state and central government departments and industrial supply etc. in this regard, the commission has kept in mind the character of service provided to each and every one by the utility, ..... of various wings, who are the consumers of energy to show an increasing trend. they are domestic consumers, non-domestic consumers/commercial consumers, industrial consumers and agricultural consumers, central and state government undertakings, public lighting and phe and army supply. the charge supplied in the case reveals that the level of consumption of .....

Abdul Gani Sofi and ors. Vs. Haj Committee and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2009J& K40

..... to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this court.7. respondent no. 3 in the reply has stated that the petitioner is a released militant, was asserted by security forces on 27-2-1993 in case fir no. 3/1993 of police station cik. petitioner is a local trained militant of hizbul mujahideen outfit, has also ..... remained under preventive detention for a period of six months. furthermore, petitioner was holding post of supervisor in the jammu and kashmir state industries department, for anti-national activities, was dismissed from service.8. no doubt respondent no. 3 (cid agency) has made reference to the case registered as fir ..... of the religion. every able bodied muslim is religiously duty bound to make the pilgrimage to mecca at least once in the lifetime subject to affordability. committee (central haj committee) and the state committee (state haj committee) in terms of the provisions of the haj committee act, 2002 have been established for facilitating/ making .....

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ255

..... any of the powers given in sub-rule (1) of this rule.provided that a superior officer of higher authority before convening a general security force court or a petty security force court shall take the advice of the chief law officer or a law officer. provided that a superior authority or higher authority while convening a ..... petitioner was charged under section 13(1)(e) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988, order dated 22-12-1999 convening of general security force court; proceedings of the general security force court and the order passed by it convicting the petitioner and awarding sentence of dismissal from service, and rigorous imprisonment as also the order ..... for an order passed by the confirming authority confirming the findings and sentence recorded by the court-martial as well as for the order passed by the central government dismissing the post confirmation petition. since we have arrived at the same conclusion as in som datt datta case : 1969crilj663 (supra) the submission of .....

Gorakh Nath Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(1)JKJ192

..... that this sub-rule shall not apply:(a) where the service is terminated on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction by a criminal court or a security force court; or(b) where the competent authority is satisfied that, for reasons to be recorded in writing, it is not expedient or reasonably practicable to give the person ..... of show cause notice.7. i have heard learned counsel for the parties and have carefully gone through the record of this case.8. section 11(2) of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'b.s.f. act') provides for dismissal, removal or reduction from service by an officer not below the rank of deputy ..... cause notice.4. in order to appreciate the respective contentions the parties, the facts in brief may be noticed.5. petitioner was enrolled as constable in the border security force on 1.7.1971 and in february 1988, he was selected for posting on deputation in the ministry of external affairs in which capacity he served in the indian .....

Sunil Kumar Misra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ159

..... has conducted himself in such manner whether or not such conduct amounts to an offence, as would render his retention in service undesirable and his trial by security force court inexpedient. the director general may inform the person concerned accordingly.(2) the director general shall further inform the person concerned it is proposed to terminate his ..... rule shall not apply- (a) where the service is terminated on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction by a criminal court or a security force court; or(b) where the competent authority is satisfied that, for reasons to be recorded in writing, it is not expedient or reasonably practicable to give the ..... 172 prescribe procedure for holding the court of inquiry. as far as rule 20 is concerned, it deals with the termination of service of officers by the central government on account of misconduct, whereas rule 22 deals with the dismissal or removal of persons other than officer on account of misconduct. admittedly the petitioner is .....

Nawab Khan, Sub [No. 870021695] Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ234

..... judgment of the writ court, his conviction and sentence, on a short ground, that his trial by the general security force court is vitiated because of flagrant violation of border security force act and border security force rules, hereinafter referred as act and rules respectively.2. mrs. surinder kour, learned counsel for the appellant, submits ..... that appellant was denied opportunity of hearing and producing evidence by the commandant before directing his trial by the general security force court on a charge under section 13(1)(e) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. according to the learned counsel, opportunity of hearing ..... his trial while exercising jurisdiction and authority under section 59 on the advice of the law officer, which institution is provided by the border security force act and rules framed thereunder to ensure that provisions of law and rules are properly followed before exercising powers by the authorities constituted under .....

Chanchal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ381

..... where a criminal court and a security force court both have the jurisdiction in respect to an offence. under above circumstances the director general, inspector ..... to a person not subject to the act, he shall not be tried by the security force court unless he commits any of the offence while on active duty, at any place, out-side india or at any place specified by the central government by notification. similarly, section 80 of the act deals with the exercise of choice ..... age. he was taken into judicial custody at central jail, udhampur on the same day. it is further stated that a departmental staff court of inquiry was ordered and his transfer was sought under section 80 of the border security force act from the criminal court for trial by a security force court. consequent upon the transfer of the custody .....