Skip to content


Central India Spinning Weaving Manufacturing Company Limited The Empress Mills Nagpur Acquisition Transfer Of Undertaking Act 1986 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: central india spinning weaving manufacturing company limited the empress mills nagpur acquisition transfer of undertaking act 1986 Page 1 of about 345 results (1.273 seconds)
Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

light of the central government geoa rules framed by the central government proceeded to issue the draft regulations invited comments from this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the impugned the electricity promoting renewable energy regulations under section 181 of the act ii tamil nadu spinning mills association v tamil nadu electricity regulatory commission ors 2021 cases 4 karnataka power transmission corporation limited kptcl a government company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act1956kaveri bhavan palace inter state taransmission regulation2008having office at karnataka power transmission corporation limited race cours e road a r cirlce benglauru560001 represented by under section 181 of the act ii tamil nadu spinning mills association v tamil nadu electricity regulatory commission ors 2021 scc dispatch facilities with state of the art communication and data acquisition capability on a real 76 nc 2024 khc 53048 wp be and these utilities are entrusted with the function of undertaking transmission of electricity through inter state transmission system and the limited a company registered under the provision of the companies act 1956 having its registered office at no 358 post majale

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Dr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

judgment passed by the apex court in the case of central bureau of investigation supra wherein it is discussed with regard the case of ex sepoy haradhan chakrabarty v union of india and another reported in air1990sc1210and brought to the notice of the month of march 2012 at the account of the company and the amount also made from the account of the vehemently contend that the scope of discharge application is very limited and defence cannot be urged while seeking for discharge and 45 500 is not bearing any explanation he also got transferred an amount of rs 8 05 000 to his personal 1 e read with 13 2 of prevention of corruption act and section 109 of ipc and payment is made directly

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Sri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...

Court : Karnataka

following judgments i paramjit kumar saroya vs the union of india and another air2014punjab and haryana121 ii rita roy vs maintenance legislature appears to have limited right to appeal for the limited class of persons namely senior citizens or parents it is 23 of the act either the senior citizen or the transferee may be considered an aggrieved party the statute provides a the act is attracted when an express recital is made undertaking an obligation to provide basic amenities and basic physical needs welfare of parents and senior citizens act 2007 for short act before respondent no 3 assistant commissioner alleging fraudulent gift deed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...

Court : Karnataka

by its sole proprietor dr k sentilnathan5 indian overseas bank central office no 762 annasalai chennai 600 002 respondents by sri sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi and anti corruption council of india if the said documents were permitted to continue on record reconstruction company india limited arcil registered as securitisation and reconstruction company under section 3 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial p no 9193 of2017between m s asset reconstruction company india limited arcil the ruby 10th floor no 29 senapati bapat marg of assignment on 31 8 2013 whereunder iob sold assigned transferred and released all financial assets pertaining to the account of aparment sankey road bengaluru 560052 for kind information and appropriate action 16 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

M/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...

Court : Karnataka

by its sole proprietor dr k sentilnathan5 indian overseas bank central office no 762 annasalai chennai 600 002 respondents by sri s r m house athanguid post 630101 shivaganga district 6 indian overseas bank central office no 762 annasalai chennai 600 002 in w p no 9578 of2017between m s asset reconstruction company india limited arcil the ruby 10th floor no 29 senapati p no 9578 of2017between m s asset reconstruction company india limited arcil the ruby 10th floor no 29 senapati bapat marg of assignment on 31 8 2013 whereunder iob sold assigned transferred and released all financial assets pertaining to the account of said resolution plan and broad terms and conditions was also acted upon and it is only on default when arcil exercised

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2024 (HC)

Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...

Court : Karnataka

by its sole proprietor dr k sentilnathan5 indian overseas bank central office no 762 annasalai chennai 600 002 respondents by sri not clear as to who this anti corruption council of india is who has submitted such a complaint to the 42 gm res in w p no 28962 of2015between asset reconstruction company india limited arcil the ruby 10th floor no 29 senapati each of the above matters are asset reconstruction company india limited arcil registered as securitisation and reconstruction company under section 3 referred to as sarfaesi rules and instructed sridevi not to transfer any assets 11 no reply having been issued to the peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare the defendant no 1 has no

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2024 (HC)

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. All India Trade Union Congress R

Court : Karnataka

which deals with advisory board and section 8 is about central advisory board as well as section 9 providing for composition a w sri b c prabhakar advocate and 1 all india trade union congress r karnataka state committee no 6 sirur secretary general sri seetharam bhat 1 1 2 brs precision manufacturing private limited unit1harohalli 1st a 1st phase industrial area kanakapura opposite new janapriya hospital kasturi nagar bengaluru 560 043 a company incorporated under the companies act 1956 engaged in supply of through its secretary general sri seetharam bhat 2 prism johnson limited time square319c3d floor kasturi nagar main road opposite new janapriya intake of natural justice 5 7 1 in swadeshi cotton mills vs union of india 1981 1 scc664 the supreme court for his decision afresh in accordance with law ii while undertaking the exercise of deciding afresh the appellants herein shall be this writ appeal filed u s4of the karnataka high court act 1961 praying to aside the order dated2609 2023 passed by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2024 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Chambers Of Commerce And Industry (fkcci) Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

which deals with advisory board and section 8 is about central advisory board as well as section 9 providing for composition sri b c prabhakar advocate 4 5 and 1 all india trade union congress r karnataka state committee no 6 sirur secretary general sri seetharam bhat 1 1 2 brs precision manufacturing private limited unit1harohalli 1st a 1st phase industrial area kanakapura minimum wages fixation adopted as slab system by the employer company in the present case the petitioners trade unions have been secretary general sri seetharam bhat 4 1 2 handiman services limited no 12 2 haudin road yellappa chetty layout shivan chetti intake of natural justice 5 7 1 in swadeshi cotton mills vs union of india 1981 1 scc664 the supreme court for his decision afresh in accordance with law ii while undertaking the exercise of deciding afresh the appellants herein shall be this writ appeal filed u s4of the karnataka high court act 1961 praying to set aside the order of the learned

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2024 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Chambers Of Commerce Vs. All India Trade Union ...

Court : Karnataka

which deals with advisory board and section 8 is about central advisory board as well as section 9 providing for composition sri b c prabhakar advocate 5 2 and 1 all india trade union congress r karnataka state committee no 6 sirur secretary general sri seetharam bhat 1 1 2 brs precision manufacturing private limited unit1harohalli 1st a 1st phase industrial area kanakapura 042 a company incorporated under the companies act 1956 the company provides housekeeping services gardening etc to various companies represented by through its secretary general sri seetharam bhat 2 prism johnson limited time square319c3d floor kasturi nagar main road opposite new janapriya intake of natural justice 5 7 1 in swadeshi cotton mills vs union of india 1981 1 scc664 the supreme court for his decision afresh in accordance with law ii while undertaking the exercise of deciding afresh the appellants herein shall be bengaluru 560 004 an association registered under the trade unions act1926represented through its secretary general sri seetharam bhat appellant by sri

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 2024 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Chambers Of Commerce Vs. All India Trade Union ...

Court : Karnataka

which deals with advisory board and section 8 is about central advisory board as well as section 9 providing for composition a w sri b c prabhakar advocate and 1 all india trade union congress r karnataka state committee no 6 sirur secretary general sri seetharam bhat 1 1 2 brs precision manufacturing private limited unit1harohalli 1st a 1st phase industrial area kanakapura scheme the tribunal decided the issue in favour of the company and abolished the slab 7 7 system of dearness allowance officer s colony basaveshwara nagar bengaluru 560 079 a private limited company incorporated under the comapnies act 1956 represented by brahamandand intake of natural justice 5 7 1 in swadeshi cotton mills vs union of india 1981 1 scc664 the supreme court for his decision afresh in accordance with law ii while undertaking the exercise of deciding afresh the appellants herein shall be bengaluru 560 004 an association registered under the trade unions act1926represented through its secretary general sri seetharam bhat 4 1 2

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //