Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter lxxv nickel and articles thereof Page 7 of about 598 results (0.364 seconds)

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Rauch Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... , the cigarettes and other tobacco products (prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as cotpa for short) and the karnataka poisons (possession and sale) 28 rules, ..... the petitions aver that police interference was rampant in all these cases and, therefore, the owners of restaurants like the petitioners were approaching this court and seeking a mandamus directing the police not to interfere in the business of respective ..... food buffs llp registered llp running a hotel under the name stories brewery and kitchen situated at no.62, munivenkatappa layout bilekahalli, b.g.main road beguru hobli, bengaluru south taluk bengaluru 560 076 represented by its managing director/partner ..... , from time to time, has disposed of such petitions directing non-interference by the police, subject to the condition that hookah was being sold at designated smoking area and not in the common area of the restaurants where food was served. ..... in writ petition no.7427 of2024between: shisha cafes and restaurant s association an association registered under the societies registration act, 1960 represented by its president mohammed danish having office at: no.27, kammanahalli main road ..... the central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajpet bengaluru 560 018 represented by its inspector. ..... central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajapete bengaluru - 560 018 represented by its inspector. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

M/s Havana Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... , the cigarettes and other tobacco products (prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as cotpa for short) and the karnataka poisons (possession and sale) 28 rules, ..... the petitions aver that police interference was rampant in all these cases and, therefore, the owners of restaurants like the petitioners were approaching this court and seeking a mandamus directing the police not to interfere in the business of respective ..... food buffs llp registered llp running a hotel under the name stories brewery and kitchen situated at no.62, munivenkatappa layout bilekahalli, b.g.main road beguru hobli, bengaluru south taluk bengaluru 560 076 represented by its managing director/partner ..... , from time to time, has disposed of such petitions directing non-interference by the police, subject to the condition that hookah was being sold at designated smoking area and not in the common area of the restaurants where food was served. ..... in writ petition no.7427 of2024between: shisha cafes and restaurant s association an association registered under the societies registration act, 1960 represented by its president mohammed danish having office at: no.27, kammanahalli main road ..... the central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajpet bengaluru 560 018 represented by its inspector. ..... central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajapete bengaluru - 560 018 represented by its inspector. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

M/s Zredhi Hospitality Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... , the cigarettes and other tobacco products (prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce, production, supply and distribution) act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as cotpa for short) and the karnataka poisons (possession and sale) 28 rules, ..... the petitions aver that police interference was rampant in all these cases and, therefore, the owners of restaurants like the petitioners were approaching this court and seeking a mandamus directing the police not to interfere in the business of respective ..... food buffs llp registered llp running a hotel under the name stories brewery and kitchen situated at no.62, munivenkatappa layout bilekahalli, b.g.main road beguru hobli, bengaluru south taluk bengaluru 560 076 represented by its managing director/partner ..... , from time to time, has disposed of such petitions directing non-interference by the police, subject to the condition that hookah was being sold at designated smoking area and not in the common area of the restaurants where food was served. ..... in writ petition no.7427 of2024between: shisha cafes and restaurant s association an association registered under the societies registration act, 1960 represented by its president mohammed danish having office at: no.27, kammanahalli main road ..... the central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajpet bengaluru 560 018 represented by its inspector. ..... central crime branch narcotic department mysore road, chamarajapete bengaluru - 560 018 represented by its inspector. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2019 (SC)

63 Moons Technologies Ltd (Formerly Known as Financial Technologies In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... article 31b which was introduced by the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, validates certain acts and regulations by providing that without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31a, none of the acts and regulations specified in the ninth schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such act, regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions ..... the day when the minister concerned took the decision proposing to designate the land for educational use the material available on record were: (a) the opinion of the chief town planner; (b) note dated 23-4-2004 prepared on the basis of the record providing the entire background of the previous litigation together with the suggestion that the land should no more be reserved for the purpose of south gujarat university ..... expired, or where any such appeal has been preferred, the appeal has been finally disposed of; and (b) the central government has considered, and made such modifications, if any, in the draft order as may seem to it desirable in the light of any suggestions and objections which may be received by it from any such company within such period as the central government may fix in that behalf, not being less than two months from the date on ..... occurs in chapter v of the companies act which reads, arbitrations, compromises, arrangements and reconstructions . .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2023 (SC)

Heinz India Limited Vs. The State Of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in hindustan lever (supra) the product, vaseline intensive care heel guard, was held to be a medicament under chapter 30 of central excise tariff act, 1985 ( ceta ) (item 3003.10, as a patent or proprietary medicine). ..... wood crafts products ltd.24 and held that central excise tariffs are based on internationally accepted nomenclature in hsn; consequently, disputes relating to classification had to, as far as possible, accord with the nomenclatures in hsn.40. ..... medicines under item no.14e of the central excise tariff.35. ..... central excise classifications are elaborate; the general notes, and chapter notes, together with the exclusions, [and further explanations]. ..... before amendment (on 01.04.1994), the entry clearly stated that preparations or formulations that were capable of being used as creams, hair oils, tooth pastes, tooth powders, cosmetics, toilet articles, soaps and shampoos were to be excluded . ..... when such word is used in an interpretation clause, it must be construed as comprehending, not only such things as they 6 2008 (9) scr4967 2004 supp (2) scr395 signify according to their natural import, but also those things which the interpretation clause declares that they shall include. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2018 (HC)

Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... -- (a)"capital goods" means: -- (a) the following goods, namely: -- (i) all goods falling under chapter 82, chapter 84, chapter 85, chapter 90, heading 6805, grinding wheels and the like, and parts thereof falling under heading 6804 of the first schedule to the central excise tariff act; (ii) pollution control equipment; (iii) components, spares and accessories of the goods specified at (i) and (ii); (iv) moulds and dies, jigs and fixtures; (v) refractories and refractory materials; (vi) tubes and pipes and fittings thereof; and (vii) storage tank, used (1) in the factory of the manufacturer of the final products, but does ..... we do not find that amendment made in cenvet credit rules 2004 which come into force on 7.7.2009 was clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the amending act that amendment made in explanation 2 was clarificatory ..... while re-stating the test, namely, first the article must be goods and secondly ceac122016 and other connected matter page 52 of 67 that it should be marketable or capable of being brought to market, it was held that goods which are attached to the earth and thus become immovable did not satisfy the test of being goods within the meaning of the central excise act nor can be said to be capable of being brought to the market for ..... in this context, it was submitted that the items in dispute are articles of iron and steel which falls under the chapter 73 and therefore, do not qualify under the definition of capital goods for grant of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Sharanya Mohan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... there being no repugnancy at all, therefore, no question arises of the operation of article 254(2) of the constitution and no provision of the impugned act and the rules made thereunder is invalidated by any provision contained in act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953 or act 10 of 1955 and the sugarcane (control) order, 1955 issued thereunder. ..... 1st cross central excise layout bhoopasandra bengaluru - 560 094, date of admission::23. ..... the test that has been applied in such cases is based on the principle on which the rule of implied repeal rests, namely, that if the subject-matter of the state legislation or part thereof is identical with that of the parliamentary legislation, so that they cannot both stand together, then the state legislation will be said to be repugnant to the parliamentary legislation. ..... was received by the respondent which was issued by the appellant stating that with effect from 3-8-2001 (incidentally this is the date on which the bill of entry was filed and goods were cleared by the respondent as 8 (2016) 16 scc692240 aforesaid), the tariff value in respect of rbd palmolein had been raised to usd372per metric tonne and therefore, the respondent was liable to pay the difference in the tariff which was paid on the basis of earlier notification. ..... even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chapter v of u.p. ..... sumedha sirchar aged about24years d/o sujit sircar address:2004. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Shivani Ramachandran Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... there being no repugnancy at all, therefore, no question arises of the operation of article 254(2) of the constitution and no provision of the impugned act and the rules made thereunder is invalidated by any provision contained in act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953 or act 10 of 1955 and the sugarcane (control) order, 1955 issued thereunder. ..... 1st cross central excise layout bhoopasandra bengaluru - 560 094, date of admission::23. ..... the test that has been applied in such cases is based on the principle on which the rule of implied repeal rests, namely, that if the subject-matter of the state legislation or part thereof is identical with that of the parliamentary legislation, so that they cannot both stand together, then the state legislation will be said to be repugnant to the parliamentary legislation. ..... was received by the respondent which was issued by the appellant stating that with effect from 3-8-2001 (incidentally this is the date on which the bill of entry was filed and goods were cleared by the respondent as 8 (2016) 16 scc692240 aforesaid), the tariff value in respect of rbd palmolein had been raised to usd372per metric tonne and therefore, the respondent was liable to pay the difference in the tariff which was paid on the basis of earlier notification. ..... even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chapter v of u.p. ..... sumedha sirchar aged about24years d/o sujit sircar address:2004. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr Tanay Appachu Shastry Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... there being no repugnancy at all, therefore, no question arises of the operation of article 254(2) of the constitution and no provision of the impugned act and the rules made thereunder is invalidated by any provision contained in act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953 or act 10 of 1955 and the sugarcane (control) order, 1955 issued thereunder. ..... 1st cross central excise layout bhoopasandra bengaluru - 560 094, date of admission::23. ..... the test that has been applied in such cases is based on the principle on which the rule of implied repeal rests, namely, that if the subject-matter of the state legislation or part thereof is identical with that of the parliamentary legislation, so that they cannot both stand together, then the state legislation will be said to be repugnant to the parliamentary legislation. ..... was received by the respondent which was issued by the appellant stating that with effect from 3-8-2001 (incidentally this is the date on which the bill of entry was filed and goods were cleared by the respondent as 8 (2016) 16 scc692240 aforesaid), the tariff value in respect of rbd palmolein had been raised to usd372per metric tonne and therefore, the respondent was liable to pay the difference in the tariff which was paid on the basis of earlier notification. ..... even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chapter v of u.p. ..... sumedha sirchar aged about24years d/o sujit sircar address:2004. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Mr. Dr. G Sai Abilash Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... there being no repugnancy at all, therefore, no question arises of the operation of article 254(2) of the constitution and no provision of the impugned act and the rules made thereunder is invalidated by any provision contained in act 65 of 1951 as amended by act 26 of 1953 or act 10 of 1955 and the sugarcane (control) order, 1955 issued thereunder. ..... 1st cross central excise layout bhoopasandra bengaluru - 560 094, date of admission::23. ..... the test that has been applied in such cases is based on the principle on which the rule of implied repeal rests, namely, that if the subject-matter of the state legislation or part thereof is identical with that of the parliamentary legislation, so that they cannot both stand together, then the state legislation will be said to be repugnant to the parliamentary legislation. ..... was received by the respondent which was issued by the appellant stating that with effect from 3-8-2001 (incidentally this is the date on which the bill of entry was filed and goods were cleared by the respondent as 8 (2016) 16 scc692240 aforesaid), the tariff value in respect of rbd palmolein had been raised to usd372per metric tonne and therefore, the respondent was liable to pay the difference in the tariff which was paid on the basis of earlier notification. ..... even the power reserved to the state government to fix minimum prices of sugarcane under chapter v of u.p. ..... sumedha sirchar aged about24years d/o sujit sircar address:2004. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //