Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1968P& H242
..... name for consideration as already pointed out, rule 30 had been amended and instead of net compensation' 'gross compensation' is now to be taken into consideration and whoever of the claimants has the highest of the gross compensation, ..... -missioner and subsequently he failed in his application under section 33of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act 1954 (act 44 of 1954) it was after that that he filed his petition under articles 226 and 227 ..... and the other just and according to business, is to read them so as to carry out that which is just and honest and businesslike ' in my opinion, the only way in which the words in question in rule 30 can be read so as to best harmonise with the subiect and the pbiect which the rule-making authority had in view and to achieve a result which would be honest and businesslike in the entire context of chapter ..... shall be the share of each co-owner and the compensation shall be payable in respect of each such share as if a claim in respect thereof had been filed and verified senaratelv' it is this rule which splits up a joint ..... and east punjab states union, asthe case may be, which has not been satisfied wholly or partially by the allotment ofany evacuee land under the relevant notification specified in section 10 of this act, * * ** * * section 4(1) of the act provided that : -- 'the central ..... act, 1948 (east puniab act 12 of1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance 2004(order 10 of 2004 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1952P& H309
..... act makes provision for the determination of questions whether any person detained is an abducted person and whether such person should be restored to his or her relatives or handed over to any other person or conveyed out of india or allowed to leave the camp and section 10 of the act authorises the central government to make rules 'inter alia' to provide for the constitution and procedure of any tribunal appointed under section 6 of the act.in my judgment, section 6 of the act satisfies the requirements of article ..... of the land, for clause 2 of article 71 of the said constitution expressly declares:'this constitution, and the laws of the united states which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the united states, 'shall be the supreme law of the land' and the judges in every state shall be ..... in the fourteenth amendment means not only the right of a citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the 'engagement' of all his faculties; to be free to use them fn all lawful ways; to live and work where he ..... 'magna carta was re-affirmed from time to time by successive english monarchs, and in 1354 edward, iii recognised the liberties and customs which the people had enjoyed in the past and declared in chapter 3 of 28 edward iii that'no man of what estate or condition that he be, shall be put out of land, or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the statement of objects and reasons to the amending act reveals that the underlying purpose was to make a mere agreement to do an illegal act or an act which is not illegal by illegal means punishable under ..... by the learned trial court to return the following finding: a perusal of these orders shows that the court was prepared to accommodate the counsel for the petitioner in such a manner as their presence in the central jail, patiala in connection with the trial of the petitioner, did not prejudicely affect their appearance in other cases that were fixed for a particular date. ..... thus, the court has violated the instructions given in volume iii, chapter xiii rule 5(a) of the high court rules and orders and also the judgment of kumar vimal 2014.02.25 13:46 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh 56 cr.a.no.292-db of 2009, cr.a.no.632-db of 2008 & cr.a.no.725-db of 2008 supreme court in sarwan singh ..... article 1 of the convention to which learned counsel for the appellants referred reads as under: any person who on board an aircraft in flight: (1) unlawfully, by force or threat thereof, or by any other form of intimidation seizes, or exercises control of, that aircraft, or attempts to perform any such act, or (2) is an accomplice of a person who performs or attempts to perform any such act ..... cross-examination conducted by shri h.v.rai, counsel for yusuf nepali on 28.01.2004, he admits the recording of statement of meena karkee, sunder karkee and kalpana pardhan .....
Tag this Judgment!