Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 Chapter 29 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 29 Page 1 of about 1,030 results (3.221 seconds)Indian Tea Packeting Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: 1988(18)ECC180
..... which is specified in relation to any goods in the section or chapter notes of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 as amounting to manufacture and the word manufacturer shall be construed accordingly ..... that subject is not to be taxed unless the charging provisions clearly imposes the obligation 29 the cases as cited by mr gupta in support of his submissions on the tests .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.P.L. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Vadodara
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 1997(58)ECC96; 1995(77)ELT485(SC); JT1995(4)SC459; 1995(3)SCALE222; 1995Supp(3)SCC1; [1995]3SCR1235; [1997]104STC164(SC)
..... which can logically be called both drugs and cosmetics now as per chapter notes no 2 of chapter 33 of central excise tariff act 1985 heading no 33 03 to 33 08 inter alia apply and include ..... appearance on the other hand it is intended to cure certain diseases as mentioned supra 29 the fact that the appellants have previously described the product as selsun shampoo will not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Ananthraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2003(1)BomCR675; (2002)4BOMLR871; 2002LC572(Bombay); 2003(151)ELT278(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj721
september 1988 exhibit s to the petition issued by the central excise authorities in so far as it seeks to levy respondents and the goods were cleared on payment of the excise duty as per the approved classification list invoking penal action the petitioners corresponds to item no 33dd of the erstwhile tariff the superintendent of central excise after seeking certain clarifications from respondents in so far as it pertains to initiating penal action against the petitioners under rule 209a of the central excise of the present petition are as follows in the year 1985 relevant to the present petition the petitioners were holding high the company filed revised classification list classifying the goods under chapter heading no 84 71 which was also approved by the the above petition was adjourned from time to time on 29th january 2002 28th february 2002 19th august 2002 and 26th
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...
Court: Mumbai
..... tobacco was classifiable under tariff head 24039990 of the central excise tariff act 1985 during the relevant period 73 however on the petitioners own showing until 2001 chapter 21 of the central excise tariff act 1985 dealt with miscellaneous ..... 13 2404 19 2404 21 2404 29 2404 31 2404 39 2404 41 2404 50 and 2404 60 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 h the petitioners product pan .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindal Co Industries Limited Vs. The Union of India
Court: Mumbai
and skimmings were not in the first schedule to the central excises and salt act 1944 at the relevant time and referred by us in the case of commissioner of central excise vs indian aluminium co ltd reported in 2006 203 e any of the tariff entry in the schedule to the tariff act and are manufactured goods in the terms of section goods in the terms of section 2 f of the act therefore the conditions contemplated under section 2 d and section first and second schedules of the central excise tariff act 1985 they rely upon the definition of the term excisable goods manufacture provided those processes are specified in the section or chapter notes of the tariff schedule as amounting to manufacture it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Court: Mumbai
..... or fresh were covered under chapter 7 of the 1985 act dried mushrooms were covered under chapter heading 07 01 and fresh mushrooms were covered under 07 02 of the central excise tariff the expression other edible ..... undue harassment to assesees and chaos in administration of tax laws 29 in the case of commissioner of central excise mumbai v s bigen industries limited reported in 2006 197 e l .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, Lucknow Vs. Wimco Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2007(122)ECC1; 2007(148)LC1(SC); 2007(217)ELT3(SC); 2007(11)SCALE619; (2007)8SCC412; (2009)20VST240(SC)
supported the order of the cegat 11 in commissioner of central excise v indian aluminium co ltd 2006 203 elt 3 was classifiable under chapter sub heading 4702 90 of central excise tariff act 1985 in short the tariff act scrutiny of classifiable under chapter sub heading 4702 90 of central excise tariff act 1985 in short the tariff act scrutiny of records 4702 90 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 for short tariff the scrap so generated is liable or not under the tariff prior to its amendment in 1985 it had been consistently held that spent earth was not and use and therefore dutiable 6 tribunal noted that the chapter heading 4702 90 of the schedule to the tariff act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Meerut Vs. Maharshi Ayurveda Corporati ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR2006SC557; 2005(103)ECC277; 2006(193)ELT10(SC); JT2005(10)SC360; (2005)13SCC584
..... no order as to costs excise classification chapters 20 and 21 of the central excise tariff act 1985 act whether herbonic manufactured by respondents can be classified under chapter 20 orchapter 21 of the act held as product was ..... t n revision of tariff rates on supply of electrical energy act 1979 act no 1 1979 sections 3 4 concessional tariff high tension industries g o ms no 29 dated 31 1 1995 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise, Baroda Vs. L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2004(93)ECC137; 2004(163)ELT290(SC); (2004)9SCC703
..... chassis falling under heading no 87 05 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 the notification reads thus effective rate of excise duty on drilling rigs mounted on motor vehicle chassis in exercise ..... made not only to the explanatory note to the headings for the machines under chapter 84 25 84 28 84 29 and 84 30 but also to the explanatory notes to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat State Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 2009(168)LC109(Delhi); 2009(241)ELT190(Del)
..... was explicitly mentioned along with sulphuric acid under tariff heading 2807 of central excise tariff act 1985 oleum is fuming sulphuric acid answering to such ..... of sulphuric acid the procedure set out in chapter x of the central excise rules 1944 shall be followed the 1975 notification ..... kirk othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology vol 16 page 29 wherein it is mentioned that cyclo hexanone oxime is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT