Cause In Fact - Judgment Search Results

Fact Employees Association Vs. Fact Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1994)IIILLJ736Ker

substantially arise. Now the Act does not deal with the cause of action, nor does it indicate what factors will confer Kerala 1973 KLT 798 = 1974 II LLJ 9. The facts therein are as follows:- Petitioner, a manufacturing concern, had no

M/S. Fact Engineering Works Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

1. When the matter was called it was submitted by the Counsel that clearance has been obtained from the Committee...

M/S. Fact Engineering Works, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

1. We find that the appellant being a PSU. Clearance is required from the Committee of Secretaries to proceed with...

M/S. Fact Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

1. The appellant being a Public Sector Undertaking clearance is required from the Committee of Secretaries to proceed with the...

M/S. Fact Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

1. When these matters were called Shri. Nambiar, Adv. submitted that he was instructed by his client to withdraw these...

Forum for Fact Finding Documentation and Advocacy Vs. State of Chhatti ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2006CriLJ4372; 2006(3)MPHT79

be no doubt that the respondents have not investigated the cause of death of Ramkumar as they ought to have done deceased. We are of the considered opinion that, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the widow and the three

Omana Oomen, Attdt. Operator, Chemical Plant Trainee and ors. Vs. the ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1991Ker129; [1991(61)FLR346]; (1991)IILLJ541Ker

they obtained in the internal examination as due to the fact that they could obtain the interim direction only on the

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Fact Engineering Works

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(35)ELT480TriDel

This is completely incorrect said the learned counsel for M/s. FACT Engineering Works.2. The learned SDR, however, supported the Government's notice

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Leather Facts Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC1343; JT1987(1)SC806; 1987(1)SCALE659; (1987)2SCC380; [1987]2SCR630; [1987]66STC91(SC); 1987(2)LC108(SC)

or in the course of inter-State trade. But the mere fact that such a form has been given will not empower

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Fact Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1994]206ITR644(Ker)

for the decision of this court :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal