Categorized - Year 2011 - Judgments

May 31 2011 (TRI)

In the Matter of Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Vs. Mah ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: May-31-2011

..... power differ widely depending upon their requirement of power therefore it is appropriate to categorize the consumers into various categories the utility classifies the consumers into the following ..... as the appellant cannot be termed as a residential or industrial they should be categorized as commercial like any other offices establishment hospitals educational institutions bus stands multiplexes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2011 (TRI)

Kanan Devan Hill Plantations Company Pvt Ltd, Munnar Vs. Kerala State ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Jan-28-2011

..... annexure iii still the categories between g1 and g 2 categorization was done away with the details which were supplied by ..... tariff revision is transferred to the board the commission holds that categorization of licensees for tariff purposes and the grid tariff revision ..... by them the commission will take a decision on the categorization only after receipt of actual data regarding the details of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 2011 (HC)

Mohd. Javed, Mohd.Akhtar, Manoj Kumar Singh, and Ikramul Haq @ Vishal. ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-06-2011

..... both did not support the prosecution s version and had categorically denied any calls having been made by the appellants hence ..... contrary to the deposition of pw 51 si suresh who categorically stated that the disclosure statement was not recorded before pw ..... medicine dept ucms requesting a final cause of death which categorically stipulated that the viscera report of the deceased was sent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2011 (TRI)

Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd, Gujarat Vs. Gujarat State Electricity R ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Mar-22-2011

..... the question is whether the order for determination of tariff in terms of the tariff categorization pursuant to which an individual consumer and the distribution licensee entered into an agreement ..... defence establishments under htp ii a in which by agreement the respondent no 3 was categorized fall railways hotels amusement parks resorts water parks aerodrams cinemas auditorium bank studios offices .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2011 (FN)

Sykes Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-09-2011

..... determining whether an offense is a violent felony this court has explained we employ the categorical approach under this approach we look only to the fact of conviction and the statutory ..... for which sykes sustained his earlier conviction falls within the residual clause because as a categorical matter it presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another the offenses enumerated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2011 (FN)

Bruesewitz Vs. Wyeth Llc

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-24-2011

..... suffers from an even more fundamental defect if congress intended to exempt vaccine manufacturers categorically from all design defect liability it more logically would have provided no vaccine manufacturer ..... 1 specifically preserving design defect claims thus cannot fairly be understood as impliedly and categorically pre empting such traditional state tort claims which had already been preserved by 22 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 25 2011 (HC)

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-25-2011

..... signal that travel through optical fibre used for communication of voice and data also categorized as electromagnetic wave ans electromagnetic waves are those waves have two inseparable components viz ..... part of the telegraph itself is transferable or deliverable to the subscribers therefore they categorically declared that the electromagnetic waves are not goods within the meaning of the word .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 2011 (HC)

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-29-2011

..... are situated without making any independent measurement therefore in the letter annexure r33 they are categorical in stating that they are not responsible for the correctness of the positions of ..... relief have made wild and unsubstantiated allegations which are not true and his respondent hereby categorically denies the unfounded and wholly baseless allegations made against him personally in para 11 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2011 (TRI)

Nfg Flat Owners Welfare Association and Another Vs. M/S Royal Projects ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on: Dec-22-2011

..... tanks with the aforesaid accessories or amenities the opposite parties in their written version categorically denied the aforesaid deficiency in service on their part they contended that the septic ..... filtration chambers chlorine dozers sock pits etc 31 the expert commissioner in c1 report has categorically reported that as per approved drawing 2 septic tanks one each on eastern and western .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2011 (HC)

Sangeeta and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-28-2011

..... arya samaj mandir near pataleswhar mahadev mandir civil lines isbt delhi 110 054 it was categorically averred that both the parties fulfilled the requirement of law and consequently a legal valid ..... impression and was duly attested before the notary public this affidavit contains inter alia a categorical statement to the effect that the deponent sangeeta was unmarried that she intended to marry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Categorized - Judgment Search Results