Categorically - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: categorically Page 1 of about 600 results (0.168 seconds)Schweiker Vs. Hogan
Court: US Supreme Court
..... states are required to provide medicaid coverage to certain individuals now described as the categorically needy at their option states also may provide coverage and receive partial federal ..... medically needy persons have less income available for nonmedical expenses than those who receive categorical assistance the broad legislative classification does not involve the type of arbitrariness that is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoncrieffe Vs. Holder
Court: US Supreme Court
..... a csa felony brief for respondent 37 then all marijuana distribution convictions would categorically be convictions of the drug trafficking aggravated felony mandatory deportation would follow under ..... into the facts of predicate offenses that we have long deemed undesirable the categorical approach serves practical purposes it promotes judicial and administrative efficiency by precluding the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDescamps Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
..... the same daunting difficulties and inequities that first encouraged the adoption of the categorical approach sentencing courts following aguila montes would have to expend resources examining often ..... that is what we have expressly and repeatedly forbidden courts may modify the categorical approach to accommodate alternative statutory definitions ibid cf mci telecommunications corp v american .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGraham Vs. Florida
Court: US Supreme Court
..... education and rehabilitation programs for those who are ineligible for parole consideration a categorical rule against life without parole for juvenile nonhomicide offenders avoids the perverse ..... constitutional veto iv although the concurrence avoids the problems associated with expanding categorical proportionality review to noncapital cases it employs noncapital proportionality analysis in a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTahoe-sierra Preservation Council, Inc. Vs. Tahoe Regional Planning Ag ...
Court: US Supreme Court
..... the benefit of comments and criticisms from interested parties during its deliberations but a categorical rule tied to the deliberations length would likely create added pressure on decisionmakers ..... become a total ban the moratorium and the normal permit process alike would constitute categorical takings petitioners conceptual severance argument is unavailing because it ignores penn central s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Matter of Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Vs. Mah ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
..... power differ widely depending upon their requirement of power therefore it is appropriate to categorize the consumers into various categories the utility classifies the consumers into the following ..... as the appellant cannot be termed as a residential or industrial they should be categorized as commercial like any other offices establishment hospitals educational institutions bus stands multiplexes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShamsher Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
..... of the concerned controlling officer b the examining medical officer board will endorse the medical categorization on completion of ame the mo board will also enter the findings remarks in a ..... rml hospital had to be scrutinized by a competent authority board before deciding on shape categorization of the petitioner the submission is fortified by the relevant provision of the standing order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSushil Arora vs.state
Court: Delhi
..... the prosecution witnesses it is noteworthy that inspector s s rana pw 26 pg298 has categorically stated that only mahender tikla was having money transaction with accused sushil arora and none ..... in the indica car 582 these contradictions are material the contradictions lend support to the categorical defence of sushil arora rajesh pandey and hemant garg given the allegation of the prosecution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Of Punjab Vs. Davinder Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
..... scheduled castes scheduled tribes particularly in the light of article 341 342 rather it categorically kept the scheduled castes scheduled tribes outside the purview of consideration the scheduled castes ..... sub classification of backward classes including the scheduled castes scheduled tribes rather they were categorically kept outside the purview of consideration by the nine judge bench in indra sawhney .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Of Karnataka Vs. Sri Govardhana Murthy @ Govardhan
Court: Karnataka
..... pertinent to note that d w 2 in her evidence categorically deposed that she has attested the documents when the junior counsel of the ..... not been disputed by the defence d w 2 has categorically deposed hence it is clear that the learned advocate for the defence counsel ..... is also pertinent to note that in 313 statement he categorically admits that the place of incident 229 which had taken place belongs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial