Captor - Judgment Search Results

Cafeteria Employees Union Vs. Angelos

Court: US Supreme Court

cafeteria employees union v angelos 320 u s 293 1943 u s supreme court cafeteria employees union v angelos 320...

Cafeteria Workers Vs. Mcelroy

Court: US Supreme Court

cafeteria workers v mcelroy 367 u s 886 1961 u s supreme court cafeteria workers v mcelroy 367 u s...

Punjab Andharyana High Court at Chandigarh Vs. Megh Raj Garg and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

g s singhvi j 1 whether the decision taken by the syndicate of the panjab university to entertain and accept...

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Vs. Babulal and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2000(2)WLN202

rajesh balia j 1 this is an appeal against the order dated 7 12 1999 passed in civil writ petition...

Khivraj Motors Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (Ct) Iv, Madras and anr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1982]50STC141(Mad)

orderramanujam j 1 the petitioner company is a dealer in motor cars automobile spares and other allied items it has...

Sampath Financial Chit Fund (P) Ltd. Vs. N.P.M. Abdul Rahman and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1978Mad160

v ramaswami j 1 the plaintiff appellant is a company incorporated under the companies act 1956 it was carrying on...

Hudson Vs. Guestier

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the lawful possession of the vessel in the sovereign of the captor the right consequently existed in full force to apply immediately ..... the municipal laws of a nation if the sovereign of the captor possesses the same right to maintain his possession against the ..... every other nation we find the property in possession of the captor under authority derived from his sovereign whose conduct cannot be .....

The Manila Prize Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cuba and the isla de luzon were properly adjudicated as prize for the benefit of captors in view of their condition immediately after the engagement and their being subsequently raised ..... paid of course by capture without destruction the government might obtain distinct acquisitions and the captors would be recompensed at the expense of the enemy circumstances have frequently occurred in which .....

Jecker, Toree and Co. Vs. Montgomery

Court: US Supreme Court

..... united states were so supported by proof as to justify the captor in not bringing them within the united states and in selling ..... there existed originally sufficient grounds for capture and condemnation still the captor had forfeited all right of prize by omitting to send the ..... or formal it embraces neither the question of power of the captor to seize nor that of the character of the subjects of .....

The Palmyra

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states who prosecutes for itself as well as for the captors the captors cannot without the authority of the government proceed to enforce ..... it has been supposed that the united states and the captors are to be deemed severally libellants having distinct rights both ..... because he is notwithstanding his release of his interest as captor interested to defeat the claim for damages however well founded .....