Cantonments Act 1924 Section 279 - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Haannurammabai Kalal (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ528; 2008(1)AIRKarR178; 2008AIHC1220(Kar); 2008AIHC1220(Kar)

in the notice issued under section 185 1 of the cantonments act 1924 was over and in view of the explanation particular act in either case the scheme of the particular act must be examined because it is a relevant enquiry 7 notice issued under section 185 1 of the cantonments act 1924 was over and in view of the explanation given by board issued the notice as per ex p 4 under section 256 of the act once again directing the appellant to

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

or adjusted against any future assessment in accordance with law cantonments act 1924 sections 68 1 nbsp revision of assessment list exclusive of furniture or machinery therein or such land is actually let or where the building or land is not let submitted that in terms of section 71 of the ca 1924 which is identically worded with the amended section 126 of order and that the above mentioned assessment is authenticated under section 69 of the ca 1924 8 mr b b jain

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Mukesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : II(2002)ACC184; 2002(50)BLJR169

area the board is relying upon section 60 of the cantonments act 1924 as being the source of the aforesaid power that ramgarh cantonment board a board constituted under the cantonments act 1924 in purported exercise of the power allegedly vested in from the facts already narrated are that the cantonment act 1924 is the earliest in point of time which empowered thecantonment entering the area of a municipality the cantonment board under section 60 of the cantonments act thus had no jurisdiction power

Cantonment Board, Delhi Vs. Mangey Ram

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi77; 1986(11)DRJ97

and cancellation of she order of sanction then surely the cantonment board has a power to reconsider the sanction already granted is urged at the bar that as and when any action prejudicial to the interest of the plaintiff will be taken building plans by virtue of the provisions of cantonment act 1924 include within its ambit power exercisable in a like manner section 338 of the delhi municipal corporation act 1957 that section authorises the commissioner to cancel the sanction of a building

Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Defence Secretary and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

this action of co provisions of section 113 of the cantonments act 1924 were violated and it was prejudicial to the chaudhary failed to maintain absolute integrity devotion to duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a government servant thereby violating there shall be no order as to costs cantonment act 1924 section 113 shall be no order as to costs cantonment act 1924 section 113

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

an assessment list of all buildings or lands in the cantonment or of both as the case may be to be judgments under the bombay municipal boroughs act and maharashtra municipalities act the same judgments have been relied upon by mr shroff the provisions contained in chapter v of the cantonment act 1924 act for short it appears that after 1st april 1980 every three years and for this purpose the provisions of sections 66 to 71 shall apply in the like manner as

J. Pratap Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT526; 2006(86)DRJ251

be allowed 16 it may be mentioned that if the cantonments act is read as a whole we have to hold board but only varied boards under section 14 of the act the term of the varied board admittedly expired on 2 the act should be concluded before this period cantonments act 1924sections 13 amp 14 appointment of civilian member to the board we cannot but express our regret that a board under section 13 of the act has not been created for secunderabad

Gajraj Singh Son of Sri Attar Singh and Meerut-rohata-barnava-binauli- ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2915

required under section 61 read with section 255 of the cantonments act 1924 2 of 1924 inviting objections and suggestions from and 3 submitted that the mere fact u p municipalities act and u p municipal corporation adhiniyam have been amended and with section 255 of the cantonments act 1924 2 of 1924 inviting objections and suggestions from all persons likely to be setalvad laid stress on the language of section 2 that section merely says that the expressions used in this act shall

Mrs. Tara Malik Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979MP188; 1979MPLJ555

jabalpur has imposed property tax under section 60 of the cantonments act that the petitioners are paying property tax on lands are also taxed by the cantonment boards under the cantonments act 7 learned counsel for the petitioners drew our attention to or buildings to the cantonment board under the cantonments act 1924 section 36 1 prohibits a local authority to which the as the state government may determine sub section 4 of section 36 provides that nothing in that section is to apply

Venkataramana Rice and General Merchants, Gudivada, Krishna District V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD449; 1998(6)ALT74

by board under section 9 held imposed levy was fee cantonments act c a no 41 2006 section 346 cantonment fund the present act the relevant provisions are shown below haryana act 1986 a p act 1996 1 an act to provide place declared to be a cantonment under the cantonments act 1924 section 3 envisages constitution of a p rural development board fund called a p rural developmental fund and according to section 9 the said fund shall be applied i to provide