Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cantonments act 1924 section 11 incorporation of cantonment board Page 1 of about 290 results (0.158 seconds)

Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)

..... reply to the public noticeand whereas i am satisfied that such a scheme of restrictions is necessary to prevent overcrowding in pune cantonment.now therefore in exercise of the powers vested in me under section 181a of the cantonments act, 1924, i hereby sanction the following scheme of restrictions:(a) the permissible floor space index shall be 1 in the civil area notified under section 43a of the cantonments act and bazar areas notified under rule 2(b) of the cantonment land administration rules 1937 and 0.5 in the remaining areas of pune ..... architect on 18.8.1980 forwarded two sets of plans to get them certified by the cantonment board for cement purposes only and assured the board that if the government did not sanction conversion plans, the petitioners would not demand any ..... filed under section 274 of the act was decided by the appellate authority and the judgment received by the cantonment board on ..... in its report at points 12.6.18 and 12.6.19 it has recommended for the cantonment board pune as under: 12.6.18 pune is a recent example of how an unbridled cantonment board promoted development on a vastly larger scale than prevailed in the adjoining municipal areas, effectively abolished ceilings on far for commercial constructions and even permitted the sale of land to private parties on a ..... maximum number of storeys is to be ground plus 2.the cantonment board has initiated amendments to the building bye-laws incorporating the above restrictions which are stated to be under the .....

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

..... of this clause, the expression 'local authority' means - (i) panchayat as referred to in clause (d) of article 243 of the constitution; or (ii) municipality as referred to in clause (e) of article 243p of the constitution; or (iii) municipal committee and district board, legally entitled to, or entrusted by the government with, the control or management of a municipal or local fund; or (iv) cantonment board as defined in section 3 of the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. mr. m.l. ..... learned counsel urged that vide finance act, 2002, parliament has bodily lifted the definition of the 'local authority' under section 3(31) of the general clauses act, 1897 ('1897 act', for short) and has incorporated the said definition vide explanation inserted in section 10(20) and consequently amc(s) is a 'local authority' and continues to be a local authority even after the said amendment to section 10(20) of the 1961 act. ..... counsel, since section 3(31) of the 1897 act is bodily incorporated into section 10(20) of the 1961 act, it follows that the judgments of various high courts earlier delivered prior to finance act, 2002 holding amc(s) to be a 'local authority', would continue to apply and the tests laid down in those judgments would continue to apply even after the said amendment to section 10(20) of the 1961 act. ..... it was next contended that section 3(31) of the 1897 act was not bodily incorporated in the explanation to section 10(20) of the 1961 act as it sought to be contended on behalf .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR843; 2007(5)BomCR316; 2007(5)MhLj313

..... ) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924); and(3) in relation to the national capital territory of delhi(i) any premises belonging to the municipal corporation of delhi, orany municipal committee or notified area committee,(ii) any premises belonging to the delhi development authority, whether such premises are in the possession of, or leased out by, the said authority, and(iii) any premises belonging to or taken on lease or requisitioned by, or on behalf of any state government or the government of any union territory.clause (2)(ii) of section ..... 2(e) of the public premises act ..... (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961(v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963. ..... (iii) any university established or incorporated by the central act. .....

Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Allahabad Bank and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 113(2004)DLT424; 2004(76)DRJ412

..... (viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924; (2 of 1924); and(3) in relation to the national capital territory of delhi,--(i) any premises belonging to the municipal corporation of delhi, or any municipal committee or notified area committee,(ii) any premises belonging to the delhi development authority, whether such premises ..... to, or taken on lease or requisitioned by, or on behalf of, the central government, and includes any such premises which have been placed by that government, whether before or after the commencement of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) amendment act, 1980, under the control of the secretariat of either house of parliament for providing residential accommodation to any member of the staff of that secretariat;(2) any premises belonging to, or taken on lease by, or on behalf of,--(i) any company as defined ..... the petitioner thereafter issued a notice dated 13.9.1991 to respondent no.2, secretary, ministry of finance asking for the appointment of an estate officer under section 3 of the pp act in view of the fact that respondent no.1 was an unauthorized occupant of the public premises so that the petitioner could seek eviction from the premises. ..... (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act. ..... (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961. .....

Vikas JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ100

..... (viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924); and(3) in relation to the national capital territory of delhi,-(i) any premises belonging to the municipal corporation of delhi, or any municipal committee or notified area committee,(ii) any premises belonging to ..... or requisitioned by, or on behalf of, the central government, and includes any such premises which have been placed by that government, whether before or after the commencement of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) amendment act, 1980, under the control of the secretariat of either house of parliament for providing residential accommodation to any member of the staff of that secretariat;(2) any premises belonging to, or taken on lease by, or on behalf of,-(i) any company ..... nos.9 and 10 demised on perpetual lease can, by no process of reasoning, be regarded as public premises belonging to the central government under section 2(e) of the public premises act, and thereforee, there was no question of the lesser applying for eviction of the express newspapers pvt. ..... (vi) the bharkha management board constituted under section 79 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 and that board as and when re-named as the bhakra-beas management board under sub-section (6) of section 80 of that act;(vii) any state government or the government of any union territory situated in the national capital territory of ..... incorporated by any central act ..... incorporated by the institute of technology act .....

Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited Vs. Air India Limited and O ...

Court : Mumbai

..... in the national capital territory of delhi or in any other union territory, (viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924) and (3) in relation to the national capital territory ..... owned or controlled by the central government, (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act; (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961 (59 of 1961), (v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963 (38 of 1963), (vi) the bhakra management board constituted under section 79 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 (31 of 1966), and that board as and when renamed as the bhakra beas management board under subsection (6) of section 80 of that act, (vii) any state government or the government of any union territory situated .....

Suhas H Pophale Vs. Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in the national capital territory of delhi or in any other union territory; (viii) any cantonment board consitituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924); and]. ..... owned or controlled by the central government, (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act, (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961 (59 of 1961), (v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963 (38 of 1963), (vi) the bhakra management board constituted under section 79 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 (31 of 1966), and that board as and when renamed as the bhakra-beas management board under sub-section (6) of section 80 of that act; [(vii) any state government or the government of any union territory situated .....

Rajeev Sood and ors. Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ShimLC337

..... other union territory;(viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924); and(3) in relation to the [national capital territory ..... (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act;(iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961 (59 of 1961);(v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963 (38 of 1963);(vi) the bhakra management board constituted under section 79 of the punjab reorganization act, 1966 (31 of 1966), and that board as and when re-named as the bhakra-beas management board under sub-section (6) of section 80 of the act;(vii) any state government or the government of any union territory situated in the national capital territory of delhi or in any .....

Uttam Parkash Bansal and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT497

..... (viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924), and (3) in relation to the (national capital territory of delhi)- (i) any premises belonging to the municipal corporation of delhi, or any municipal committee or notified area committee, (ii) any premises belonging to the delhi development authority, whether such premises ..... had a binding effect and that the respondents were under an obligation to follow the guidelines, and if we apply the parameters laid down in the guidelines, we find that the action initiated by the respondents under the 1971 act was justified and came squarely within the scope of the guidelines since the appellant was declared an unauthorised occupant of the premises in question on the basis of his tenancy having been determined on the ground of ..... . let us consider the validity of each of these orders and the scope of judicial review in respect of each of them- (a) the definition of unauthorised occupation in section 2(e) of the act is the occupation by any person of the public premises after the authority under which he was allowed to occupy the premises has expired or has been determined for any reason whatsoever ..... (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act. ..... (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961. .....

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

..... the cantonment executive officer thereafter sent a fresh notice dated 3rd june, 1983 to the respondents under section 71 of the cantonment act for amendment of the assessment list stating that the cantonment board had proposed to increase the annual letting value of the property due to addition of new constructions from rs. ..... to be noted that while enacting the proviso, the legislature has consciously used the words 'any period prior to the commencement of the year in which the assessment list is made' which clearly indicate that the cantonment board has got power to recover the tax even prior to the year in which amendment has been effected subject to condition that such recovery cannot be made for the period prior to the period in which the ..... in this case the respondent's objections were disposed of sometime in april, 1984, the amended entry will be effective even for the preceding years 1981 -82, 1982-83 and 1983-84 because by reason of additions and alterations the cantonment board is expressly empowered to levy the taxes from the date when such additions and alterations were made subject to the condition that such levy cannot be effected in respect of any period prior to commencement of the year ..... the buildings of the respondents are assessed and taxed on their annual value in accordance with the provisions contained in chapter v of the cantonment act, 1924 ('act' for short). ..... briefly the facts are that the respondents are a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956. .....