Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1951SC69; (1951)53BOMLR402; [1951]2SCR51
..... it may be observed that in exercise of legislative power under item 1 of list ii a provincial legislature can alter the constitution of the existing courts, can abolish them, reorganize them and can establish new courts. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1954SC653
..... it appears from the rules that the taluk de-development committee is constituted as a part of the scheme for reorganization of rural development.it is a sort of advisory body consisting of 10 members and is presided over by a non-official chairman. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1956SC202; [1955]2SCR1076; [1956]7STC113(SC)
..... world war, the contracts directorate and the indian stores department were in 1940 amalgamated with the department of supply so that in 1941, when the act was passed, the position was that department of supply as reorganized on the 3rd august, 1940 included amongst its activities and functions the purchase of stores for the needs of the government. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1957SC142; 1957CriLJ294; [1956]1SCR734
..... the police act, 1861 was enacted to reorganize the police and to make it a more efficient instrument for the prevention and detection of crimes, whereby the state government is given authority to appoint police officers, such as the inspector-general, etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1958SC525; (1958)IIMLJ86(SC); [1959]1SCR236
..... the union of india has specifically raised the additional plea that even after reorganization the two railways in question were separate entities and were working in the different regions having more or less divergent local conditions, and so they did not constitute one railway administration within the meaning of ..... subsequently, the railways were reorganized and the complaint was then suitably amended with the result that the eastern railway with its headquarters at calcutta was substituted for both the original respondents. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC994
..... the state of madhya pradesh (which stands substituted for the state of vindhya pradesh after the reorganization of states) in answer to the petition stated that the contractors were sold not only the right in leaves in forest trees but also the right in leaves on trees standing on jagir lands or on the holdings of the tenants. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC51; (1960)62BOMLR58; [1960]1SCR605
s.k. das, j. 1. this is an appeal on a certificate granted by the high court of bombay under art. 132(1) of the constitution, and the question involved in the appeal is the true scope and effect of art. 3 of the constitution, particularly of the proviso thereto as it stands after the constitution (fifth amendment) act, 1955. 2. on december 22, 1953, the prime minister of india made a statement in parliament to the effect that a commission would be appointed to examine 'objectively and dispassionately' the question of the re-organisation of the states of the indian union 'so that the welfare of the people of each constituent units as well as the nation as a whole is promoted'. this was followed by the appointment of a commission under a resolution of the union government in the ministry of home affairs, dated december 29, 1953. the commission submitted its report in due course and on april 18, 1956; a bill was introduced in the house of the people (lok sabha) entitled the states reorganisation bill (no. 30 of 1956). clauses 8, 9 and 10 of the said bill contained a proposal for the formation of three separate units, namely, (1) union territory of bombay; (2) state of maharashtra including marathawada and vidharbha; and (3) state of gujarat including saurashtra and cutch. the bill was introduced in the house of the people on the recommendation of the president, as required by the proviso to art. 3 of the constitution. it was then referred to a joint select committee of the house .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC845; [1960]3SCR250
..... in fact it is well-known that as a result of the states reorganization act, 1956 (act xxxvii of 1956), in the place of the original 27 states and one area which were mentioned in part d in the first schedule to the constitution, there are now only 14 states and 6 other areas .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC1191; [1960]3SCR764
..... on october 20, 1955, the government of madras issued a further notification reorganizing the motor transport department with reference to the motor vehicles (madras amendment) act, 1944 (act xxxix of 1944). .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1960SC1080; [1960]3SCR887
..... it is not disputed that, after the states reorganization, the provisions of the act were not extended by any legal process to the properties situate in that area of the kerala state which originally formed part of cochin state. .....
Tag this Judgment!