Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: c reorganization Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 940 results (0.113 seconds)

Jul 27 2007 (SC)

indradeo Paswan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2683; 2007(2)BLJR2241; JT2007(9)SC488; 2007(9)SCALE380; (2007)7SCC250; 2008(2)SLJ130(SC)

..... upon by the learned counsel, we find that it related to a question of inter se seniority and this court held that under section 82(6) of the punjab reorganization act, 1966 conditions of service applicable immediately before the appointed day could not be varied to the disadvantage of an officer except with the previous approval of the ..... as it was and that acceptance of individual grievances, unless clear cases are made out, would make it a never ending process and that would not be in the interests of the reorganized states or of the employees and going by this yardstick, the high court was justified in the case on hand in not interfering with the allocation of the appellant to the ..... of bihar and he was the senior-most in the department of mines even in the undivided state of bihar and continues to be so in the reorganized state of bihar and the solitary post of director of mines as on the appointed day, available only in the state of bihar, was within the reach of the appellant and he could not ..... has explained the position as to why the appellant had to be and had been allocated to the reorganized state of bihar and the context in which his option to serve in the state of jharkhand could ..... mines) on the appointed day and since nobody occupied the promotional post of additional director (mines) or the director of mines as on that day, the appellant had to be allocated to the reorganized state of bihar so that he could aspire to get and get his due promotion as the director of mines. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2003 (SC)

Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)152; 2004(5)BomCR921; 2004(4)MhLj784; 2004(10)SCALE344; (2004)9SCC481; 2004(1)SLJ151(SC); 2004(1)LC634(SC)

..... in a case of this nature the degree of disadvantages of various elements which constitute the input for specification may not be totally different and the state of maharashtra even after reorganization might have agreed for inclusion of the said tribe halba/halbi as a scheduled tribe in the state of maharashtra having regard to the said fact in mind.6. ..... is as to whether the appellant being a scheduled tribe known as halba/halbi which stands recognized both in the state of madhya pradesh as well as in the state of maharashtra having their origin in the chhindwara region, a part of which, on states' reorganization,has come to state of maharashtra, was entitled to the benefit of reservation? ..... it is not disputed that as a result of state reorganization, a part of the said district being chandrapur, which was originally in the state of madhya pradesh, had gone into the state of maharashtra. ..... in other words, the question that is required to be posed and answered would be as to whether the members of the scheduled tribe belonging to one region would continue to get the same benefits despite bifurcation thereof in terms of states' reorganization act. ..... after reorganization, when chandrapur was included within the territory of state of maharashtra, the caste 'halba' was recognized as scheduled tribe also in the state of maharashtra. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2006 (SC)

Nautam Prakash Dgsvc, Vadtal and ors. Vs. K.K. Thakkar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2075; 2006(3)BomCR883; 2006(5)MhLj531; 2006(5)SCALE213; (2006)5SCC330

..... 12921/e, dated the 28th april, 1960, the charity commissioner, bombay, a corporation sole, was reconstituted and reorganized so as to constitute a new corporation for gujarat region and to reconstitute the existing corporation to function for maharashtra region.clauses 4 (b) & (c), 5 and 6 (a) & (b) read thus:- 4. ..... state government expedient that any existing corporation which is operating and functioning immediately before the commencement of this act, should be dissolved or that it should be reconstituted and reorganized so that there are established or functioning separate corporations for the maharashtra and gujarat regions, that government may by order make provision for such dissolution or reconstitution and reorganization of such existing corporation.the said provision was intended to apply to the institution of charity commissioner.6. ..... in view of the bifurcation of the bombay state, it was proposed to provide for the reorganization of such statutory corporate bodies into two intra-regional bodies before bifurcation of the state as also for distribution of their assets and liabilities etc. ..... the parliament enacted the bombay reorganization act, 1960 in terms whereof the state of gujarat was carved out of the state of bombay. ..... in anticipation of such reorganization, the legislature of the state of bombay enacted the bombay statutory corporations (regional act xxi of 1960). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2006 (SC)

Tata Cummins Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR155(SC)]; 2006(7)SCALE468; (2006)6SCC336; [2006]148STC199(SC); 2006(2)LC1134(SC)

..... in the meantime, the state of bihar was reorganized under the bihar reorganization act, 2000 and two successor states of bihar and jharkhand were created. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1967 (SC)

State of Mysore and anr. Vs. P. Narasing Rao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC349; [1968(17)FLR179]; 1968LabIC360; (1968)IILLJ120SC; [1968]1SCR407

..... 115 of the states reorganization act, 1956 (act no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2005 (SC)

Kapila Hingorani Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC980; [2005(104)FLR869]; JT2005(1)SC440; (2005)IILLJ232SC; (2005)2SCC262; 2005(2)SLJ417(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1490

..... it is not in dispute that pursuant to or in furtherance of the directions issued by this court, the central government has exercised its jurisdiction under section 65 of the states reorganization act.10. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1965 (SC)

Ramchandra Vs. Tukaram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC557; 1965MhLJ850(SC); [1966]1SCR594

..... the land was originally in the vidharbha region which before the bombay reorganization act, 1956 was apart of the state of madhya pradesh, and the tenancy of the land was governed by the berar act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1976 (SC)

State of Mysore and anr. Vs. H. Srinivasmurthy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1104; 1976LabIC764; (1976)IILLJ311SC; (1976)1SCC817; [1976]3SCR255

..... in november 1958, another batch of 107 persons were similarly promoted as assistant engineers with retrospective effect from 1st november 1956, when the new state of mysore emerged under the states reorganization act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2008 (SC)

Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd. Vs. Essar Power Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC1921; 2008(2)ARBLR1(SC); 2008(2)AWC1238(SC); (2008)2CompLJ357(SC); 2008(4)CTC539; 2008LC(SC)1; (2008)3GLR2246(SC); JT2008(3)SC336; (2008)4MLJ573(SC); (2008)4SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2169

..... in the meantime, under the gujarat electricity industry (reorganization and regulation) act, 2003 published in the gujarat government gazette on 12th may, 2003 the assets and liabilities of the board were transferred to the appellant nigam.6. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2006 (SC)

Purushottam Kumar Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC3655; [2006(3)JCR263(SC)]; JT2006(7)SC46; (2006)IIILLJ238SC; 2006(4)SCALE561; 2006(3)SLJ482(SC); (2006)9SCC458

..... secretary, department of co-operation recommended the name of the appellant as departmental lawyer/law officer to get information as to pending cases in the high court of patna and to suggest to the government to curb misuse of public fund.by the bihar reorganization act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), the erstwhile state of bihar was bifurcated into two states; (1) state of bihar; and (2) state of jharkhand. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //