Skip to content


By That Act - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: by that act Page 1 of about 1,406 results (0.035 seconds)
Feb 03 2006 (TRI)

Act Shipping Limited Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)8STT344

1. After hearing both sides in this application for waiver & stay of service tax of Rs. 97,000/- credit which...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2017 (HC)

Topa Mallah ? Jhora Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

mad. He further stated that he had not seen the actual assault but he had seen the appellant standing with sabal.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 1919 (PC)

Indian Stamp Act and Vs. Ibrahim Ishak

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 51Ind.Cas.221

Sub-clause (i) of the First Schedule of the Indian Stamp Act, that is to say, 'the lease purports to be for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2011 (TRI)

Sergeant (Acting Unpaid J.W.O) B.M. sharma (service No.700097 'R') CLK ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

copy of the order to AFRO for information and necessary action. Issue free copies to both sides.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Act Shipping Ltd and Others Vs. Cc.Kandla

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Notification on mid-term review was for the consignment wherein the actual width is less than 1250MM who declared the consignment as

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 1879 (PC)

In Re: Act Xviii of 1869 and of the Uncovenanted Service Bank (Limited ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1879)ILR4Cal830

taken a correct view of the provisions of the Stamp Act. Before we look at Section 15 to see what instruments

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1890 (PC)

In Re: Act I of 1879; in Re: Reference from the Board of Revenue Under ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1892)ILR19Cal499

the present case, and there is no provision in the Act which can relate to the valuation of annuities secured by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 1919 (PC)

Indian Companies Act and the Company Vs. the Maharaja Bahadur Sir Rame ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 58Ind.Cas.561

within the meaning of Section 163(1) of the Indian Companies Act. Reliance was placed upon the judgment of Sir G. Jessel,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 2013 (HC)

Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 Be Ordered to Run Concurrently. Vs. Un ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

two separate complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 be ordered to run concurrently. The petitioner Baljit Singh has

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Acquisition Act 1894 (here-in-after referred to as 'The Act'), Vs. Sub ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

time of issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act is a question of fact which can be effectively ascertained

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //