By Name - Judgment Search Results

xxxxxxxxx (Name Withheld) Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

the petitioner is that he induced and lured by words namely, assurance to the victim's mother, in such a way to

‘M’ (Name Withheld) vs.vijeta @ Varsha @ Lali

Court: Delhi

record, to suggest that the appellant was not using the name Manish as well. This defence had been taken after conclusion

Ab (Name Withheld), Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2005(I)OLR295

the charge sheet and the accused persons in these cases, namely, Srimati Prabasini Kar, Sri Susanta Kumar Mohaptra and Dr. Sidhartha

Sr. Case Name of Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the column of possession it is self-cultivation but also the name of Ranjit Singh, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners have been find

Named and Unnamed Children Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

Named and Unnamed Children v. Texas - 448 U.S. 1327 (1980)

Name Withheld Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1998(II)OLR650

clear that while granting certified copy to the parties, the names of petitioner No. 1 and opposite parties 2 and 3

‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

dispute that the respondent was running a company under the name and style of Royal Blue Holidays in which the victim

‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.vikash Sharma & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Ms.Neha Kapoor, Advocate for R1. Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. X (Assumed name) VIKASH SHARMA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG +

‘X’ (Assumed Name) vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Court: Delhi

not incorporated in the complaint. The co- complainant Y (Assumed name) had categorically narrated various Crl.R.P.335/2016 Page 1 of 5 incidents

X (Assumed Name) vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

petitions have been preferred one by the victim X (changed name) and the other by the State to challenge the legality