Busing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: busing Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 464 results (0.045 seconds)Karnataka State Private Buses Employee's Union Vs. Commissioner and Se ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Kant270
order1 in this petition the karnataka state private buses employees union has prayed for an order in the nature of mandamus to subject the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWashington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... the so called seattle plan for desegregation the plan which makes extensive use of busing and mandatory reassignments desegregates elementary schools by pairing and trading predominantly minority with ..... body ultimately responsible for the provision of public education has determined that certain mandatory busing programs are detrimental to the education of its children t he fourteenth amendment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrawford Vs. Los Angeles Board of Educ.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... the trial court approved a desegregation plan that included substantial mandatory pupil reassignment and busing while the trial court was considering alternative new plans in 1979 the voters ..... take reasonably feasible steps to desegregate and they remain free to adopt reassignment and busing plans to effectuate desegregation footnote 12 nonetheless petitioners contend that proposition i is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Salkia Transport Associates
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-07-1982
Reported in: (1983)33CTR(Cal)198,[1983]143ITR39(Cal)
..... hold that the assessee was not the owner of the buses because the buses were not registered in the name of the assessee ..... the sub lessees as consideration for allowing them to exploit those buses in the transport business and that the receipts were therefore ..... contention of the departmental representative that the registered owner ofthe five buses in question also was the company and not the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeethapathy Transports (P.) Ltd. Vs. Gift-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Oct-19-1982
Reported in: (1984)7ITD540(Mad.)
..... on the business of bus transport in tirunelveli district it owned 14 buses on 16 5 1974 a resolution was passed to the effect ..... their route permits with effect from 1 6 1974 these 14 buses which were all that owned were therefore transferred for rs 2 ..... down the government may not therefore revive the law for nationalisation of buses the nationalisation can be effected by refusal of permits to ply .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Erode Service
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Jul-09-1982
Reported in: (1983)3ITD755(Mad.)
..... taken into account depreciation of rs 27 431 in respect of buses which have been taken away by the retiring partners the ..... in the circumstances we are convinced that the allotment of the buses to the retiring partners in lieu of their share of adjustment ..... meaning is of no particular assistance in deciding this issue the buses have been treated by mutual consent of the partners as partnership .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJolly Engineers and Contractors Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
Decided on: Jan-24-1982
Reported in: (1982)2ITD92(Asr.)
..... and the assessee company had claimed a depreciation on these passenger buses purchased in this year the claim of depreciation had been duly ..... company he allowed the depreciation on the sale consideration for these buses now the commissioner is of the view that the ito should ..... when the ito had no doubt regarding the consideration for the buses he could not be expected to take any protective measure as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shriram Prayagdas and Mahadeo Prasad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-1982
Reported in: (1982)27CTR(MP)155; [1983]144ITR883(MP)
..... company the assessee paid rs 20 053 and got the buses released forcarrying on the business the tribunal allowed these payments ..... of the united transport company the payment made forgetting the buses released cannot therefore amount to capital expenditure and the punjab ..... the dues of the united transport company the possession of buses by the assessee was absolutely necessary for carrying on its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ1138
..... an attempt them on fire in an attempt to burn the buses while to burn the buses while these buses were parked these buses were parked at bus stand amritsar at bus stand amritsar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTulsi Ram and ors. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Regional ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-12-1982
Reported in: AIR1982All366
..... regional transport authority meerut and had the sanctioned strength of 25 buses on june 13 1959 nine vacancies on the said route ..... is illegal to completely do away with plying of such private buses over such corridor would cause undue hardship to motor operators ..... general public it has accordingly been decided that plying of private buses on corridors should continue to be allowed subject to certain .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial