Bus - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bus Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 578 results (0.051 seconds)M/S Durga Bus Service Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-06-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)MPHT227; 2001(2)MPLJ165
..... no 360 2000 3 the petitioner claimed to be the owner of the bus no mp 04 h 8517 the vehicle was seized by the police ..... between indore pandurna route of which the driver had no valid permit thus bus was seized for violation of section 66 of the motor vehicles act which ..... exercise under section 207 1 of the motor vehicles act to seize the bus the remedy of the applicant was to take an action as provided .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Management of Shri Ganapati Bus Service Thirunelveli Vs. Presiding ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-13-2000
Reported in: AIR2001SC427; [2001(88)FLR545]; JT2001(1)SC153; (2001)ILLJ551SC; (2001)1MLJ193(SC); 2000(8)SCALE256; (2001)2SCC602
..... small medical box was being carried on the roof of the bus luggage charges had not been recovered for that on 4 ..... plantain leaf bundle was being carried on the roof of the bus without luggage charges having been levied 10 in the first case ..... and industrial dismissal labour laws three charges leveled against conductor of bus in first case labour court concluded sufficient punishment awarded to conductor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDepot Manager, Apsrtc, Pargi Bus Depot Vs. Labour Court-iii, Hyderabad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-2000
Reported in: 2000(6)ALD95; 2000(6)ALT708; (2001)ILLJ381AP
..... of this court in wa nos 1196 and 1197 of 1994 in depot manager apsrtc bus depot musheerabad hyderabad v the addl labour court hyderabad dated 25th day of october 1994 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManagement of N.S. Bus Service and anr. Vs. Appellate Authority Under ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-04-2000
Reported in: [2002(92)FLR383]; (2002)ILLJ516Mad
y venkatachalam j 1 since the parties concerned as well as the subject matter involved in these writ petitions are...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.G. Balakrishnan Brothers Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jun-06-2000
Reported in: (2001)123STC508Tribunal
..... manufactured and resulted in the emergence of a new commercial commodity namely bus chassis bus body and complete bus are different commercial commodities in common parlance therefore consequent on the construction ..... authority disallowed the exemption on the ground that the exported commodity namely bus was different from bus body sold by the assessee and therefore the claim of exemption under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndhra Pradesh State Road Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-20-2000
..... agreement according to him the dominant objective and intention of the appellant was to purchase bus bodies and therefore the transactions entered into were the transactions of purchase and sale ..... dominant object and intention between the parties was to construct and sell and purchase the bus bodies in terms of the requirements and specifications indicated by the appellant corporation and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndhra Pradesh State Road Vs. Dy. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-20-2000
Reported in: (2002)74TTJ(Hyd.)531
..... agreement according to him the dominant objective and intention of the appellant was to purchase bus bodies and therefore the transactions entered into were the transactions of purchase and sale ..... dominant object and intention between the parties was to construct and sell and purchase the bus bodies in terms of the requirements and specifications indicated by the appellant corporation and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijaya Kuruba G. Vs. Karnataka State Road Trans. Corpn.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2000
Reported in: 2001ACJ1701
..... was due to negligence and carelessness of the driver of the bus it was specifically contended that the accident occurred entirely due ..... took place on account of rash and negligent driving of bts bus no mef 419 and the petitioner sustained injuries 2 whether ..... suffered injuries she should not have tried to board the moving bus learned counsel for the respondent contended that the evidence indicates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKothakalava Naga Subba Reddi and Others Vs. the Public Prosecutor High ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-28-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC3480; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)795; 2000CriLJ3452; JT2000(3)SC480; 2000(2)SCALE572; (2000)9SCC21; [2000]2SCR583
..... three persons p w 5 got down from the said bus at earlier bus stop and at the next stop pw 1 deceased and ..... reveals that deceased along with three other witnesses boarded the said bus from rayachoti for returning to their village and that pws 1 ..... independent government officers not only this an independent witness namely the bus conductor has specifically deposed that he saw along with the deceased .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnna Transport Corporation Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-03-2000
Reported in: (2001)124STC273Tribunal
..... exemption could be granted merely on the ground that chassis and bus bodies have suffered tax locally the assessee preferred first appeal and ..... the madras high court the assessee took another plea that the bus bodies also suffer tax this contention was factually found incorrect ..... conditions of form 14 thus the levy of purchase tax on bus bodies for violations of conditions was held justified in this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial