Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: burn company and indian standard wagon company nationalisation act 1976 section 24 assumption of liability Page 1 of about 37 results (0.061 seconds)

Jun 26 2013 (HC)

Burn Standard Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... parliament known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) act 1976. both the companies were nationalized and became as state w.e.f.01.04.1975. (6) the land purchased by the ..... residential quarters and a bungalow on this freehold land. subsequently, the company fell into loss and the central government had taken over management of burn standard company limited and of indian standard wagon company, as per decision in the year 1973. an ordinance was issued on 23.06.1976 known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) ordinance, 1976. thereafter an act was enacted by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1988 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC108

..... further or to continue to act on the basis thereof or in pursuance thereto.2. the respondent no. 1, was initially comprised of m/s. burn & company limited and indian standard wagon co. ltd. prior to their nationalisation by the central government in pursuance of an ordinance no. 8 of 1976, which has since been ..... by shri atul chandra tikadar, assistant collector of central excise, calcutta, v division, who is respondent no. 6. the said deponent has stated that burn and company limited and indian standard wagon ltd., prior to their nationalisation by the central government, pursuant to ordinance no. 6 of 1976, which has since been replaced by central act ..... 97/76, were public limited companies. it has been stated that by and under the central act as mentioned above, the undertaking of burn and company ltd. and indian standard wagon company ltd. and all their rights, title and interest in relation to their respective undertakings stood .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1981 (HC)

Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]52STC62(Mad)

..... the petition, it is claimed by the petitioner that originally the management of the undertaking of burn & co. ltd. was taken over by the central government with effect from 19th december, 1973, by virtue of the burn company and indian standard wagon company (taking over of management) act, 1973. later, burn & co. was nationalised under act 97 of 1976 and by virtue of the provisions of ..... that act, with effect from 1st april 1975, the undertaking, i.e., the assets only of burn & company ltd. and the right, title and interest of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1976 (SC)

Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)

..... merely in pursuance of the policy laid down by the central government in entrusting the distribution of sugar exclusively to co-operative societies. in bennett coleman company's case the impugned newsprint control policy was an emanation of the old policy which was enunciated prior to the proclamation of emergency. relying on ibrahim ..... ? blind, unquestioning obethence does not flourish on english soil, said lord simonds in christie v. leachinsky [1947] a.c. 573 ,591 will it flourish on indian soil these broadly are the sensitive questions for decision and importantly, they arise in the wake of * proclamations of emergency issued by the president424. part xviii of the ..... are well housed ,we fed and well treated., is almost maternal even parents have to take appropriate preventive action against these children who may threaten to burn down the house they live in.419. if there are, under our constitution some obligations or overriding powers or duties vested in superior courts as learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1982 (SC)

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

..... of this court in the case of hind overseas private limited v. raghunath prasad jhunjhunwala and ors. : [1976]2scr226 :although the indian companies act is modelled on the english companies act, the indian law is developing on its own lines. our law is also making significant progress of its own as and when necessary. where the ..... needle industries newey (india) holding ltd. & ors. : [1981]3scr698 rendered by chandrachud, c.j. shows the importance of foreign decisions in deciding case arising under the indian company law which out of necessity has to keep pace with the well established principles prevailing in many other parts of the world for sustaining international trade and commerce. adoption of ..... various other persons dealing with the firm.74. it has to be borne in mind that a company can only be wound up in accordance with the provisions of the indian companies act. the right to have a company wound up is a right created by the statute. the entire proceeding in relation to the winding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1978 (SC)

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... commissions of inquiry constituted by the government of india to inquire into excesses committed during the emergency and in respect of matters concerning maruti and its associate companies and the central government was of the view that the petitioner should be available in india to give evidence before these commissions of inquiry and she should ..... in all india bank employees' association v. national industrial tribunal : (1961)iillj385sc . the legislation which was challenged in that case was section 34a of the banking companies act and it was assailed as violative of article 19(1)(c). the effect of section 34a was that no tribunal could compel the production and inspection of any ..... politics of the party-in-power or the planning economics of the government of the day? is it conceivable that an indian will forfeit his right to go abroad because his flowing side-burns or sartorial vagaries offend a high-placed authority's sense of decency the point is that liberty can be curtailed only if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1993 (SC)

Unni Krishnan, J.P. and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC2178; JT1993(1)SC474; 1992(2)SCALE703; (1993)1SCC645; [1993]1SCR594

..... (or the corresponding legislation, if any, e.g., tamil nadu religious and charitable endowments act and a.p. religious and charitable endowments act.) no individual, firm company or other body of individuals, by whatever appellation called - except those mentioned above - will be permitted to establish and/or administer a professional college. all the ..... of institutions have sprung up in the country that style themselves:medical college; andwhereas, such institutions charge large sums as capitation fees, a practice which the indian medical association and the medical council of india have opposed a number of times; and whereas, such institutions neither have suitable buildings, nor proper equipment and ..... establish an educational institution under article 19(1)(g)?3. does recognition or affiliation make the educational institution an instrumentality?7. all these matters raise a burning issue; as to how to put an end to the evil of capitation fee or at least to regulate it.8. as a prelude, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1973 (SC)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... (2) has undergone several changes. as originally enacted it read thus: no property, movable or immovable, including any interest in, or in any company owning, any commercial or industrial undertaking, shall be taken possession of or acquired for public purposes under any law authorising the taking of such possession ..... 'all our paper constitutions will become useless and purposeless.... * * * * *'the choice for india, 'wrote santhanam,'...is between rapid evolution and violent revolution...because the indian masses cannot and will not wait for a long time to obtain the satisfaction of their minimum needs.' * * * * *what was of greatest importance to most ..... measures strengthened the demand for constitutional guarantees of fundamental rights. as far back as 1895, the constitution of india bill, prepared by some eminent indians, envisaged for india a constitution guaranteeing to everyone of our citizens freedom of expression, inviolability of one's house, right to property, equality before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1996 (HC)

Paschimbanga Bhumijibi Krishak Samiti and ors. Vs. State of West Benga ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1996)2CALLT183(HC),100CWN900

..... nationalisation is only in implementation of the policy declared in clause (b) of article 39.in the recent decision, of this court in tinsukhia electric supply company, the tinsukhia electric supply undertaking (acquisition) act, 1973 was challenged as unconstitutional. the contention that the act was entitle to the protection under article ..... of the constitutional amendments no amount at all is required to be paid for is accepted, the same would amount to confiscation and not acquisition. indian constitution postulates a civilised society. the founding fathers were aware of the distinction between the power to acquire under the constitutional provisions as contained in ..... done away with retrospective effect from 5th may. 1953. reference in this connection has been made in the matter of cauvery water disputes tribunal reported in : air1992sc522 , indian aluminium co. v. state of kerala and ors. reported in : [1996]2scr23 and state of haryana and ors. v. karnat co-op. farmers' society ltd. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1978 (HC)

H. Puttappa and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1978Kant148; ILR1978KAR605; 1978(1)KarLJ302

..... exercised through their newspapers through which they speak. the press reaches the public through the newspapers. the shareholders speak through their editors. the fact that the companies are the petitioners does not prevent this court from giving relief to the shareholders, editors, printers whohave asked for protection of their fundamental rights by reason of ..... angle. section 112 prohibits persons other than a co-operative society from trading or carrying on business under the name 'co-operative' or the equivalent in any indian language. the association of citizens must, therefore, be registered as a cooperative society under the act for doing business or carrying on like other activities. it ..... and governed by an act called 'the co-operative societies act, 1912.' if we peruse the provisions of that act, it becomes clear that the indian co-operative movement was never a spontaneous development in its formal phase. it was a creation of the statute which has its object the promotion of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //