Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: burn company and indian standard wagon company nationalisation act 1976 section 11 accounts and audit Page 1 of about 32 results (0.364 seconds)

Burn Standard Company Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... parliament known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) act 1976. both the companies were nationalized and became as state w.e.f.01.04.1975. (6) the land purchased by the ..... residential quarters and a bungalow on this freehold land. subsequently, the company fell into loss and the central government had taken over management of burn standard company limited and of indian standard wagon company, as per decision in the year 1973. an ordinance was issued on 23.06.1976 known as the burn company and indian standard wagon company (nationalization) ordinance, 1976. thereafter an act was enacted by the .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC108

..... further or to continue to act on the basis thereof or in pursuance thereto.2. the respondent no. 1, was initially comprised of m/s. burn & company limited and indian standard wagon co. ltd. prior to their nationalisation by the central government in pursuance of an ordinance no. 8 of 1976, which has since been ..... by shri atul chandra tikadar, assistant collector of central excise, calcutta, v division, who is respondent no. 6. the said deponent has stated that burn and company limited and indian standard wagon ltd., prior to their nationalisation by the central government, pursuant to ordinance no. 6 of 1976, which has since been replaced by central act ..... 97/76, were public limited companies. it has been stated that by and under the central act as mentioned above, the undertaking of burn and company ltd. and indian standard wagon company ltd. and all their rights, title and interest in relation to their respective undertakings stood .....

Burn Standard Company Limited Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]52STC62(Mad)

..... the petition, it is claimed by the petitioner that originally the management of the undertaking of burn & co. ltd. was taken over by the central government with effect from 19th december, 1973, by virtue of the burn company and indian standard wagon company (taking over of management) act, 1973. later, burn & co. was nationalised under act 97 of 1976 and by virtue of the provisions of ..... that act, with effect from 1st april 1975, the undertaking, i.e., the assets only of burn & company ltd. and the right, title and interest of the .....

Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)

..... merely in pursuance of the policy laid down by the central government in entrusting the distribution of sugar exclusively to co-operative societies. in bennett coleman company's case the impugned newsprint control policy was an emanation of the old policy which was enunciated prior to the proclamation of emergency. relying on ibrahim ..... ? blind, unquestioning obethence does not flourish on english soil, said lord simonds in christie v. leachinsky [1947] a.c. 573 ,591 will it flourish on indian soil these broadly are the sensitive questions for decision and importantly, they arise in the wake of * proclamations of emergency issued by the president424. part xviii of the ..... are well housed ,we fed and well treated., is almost maternal even parents have to take appropriate preventive action against these children who may threaten to burn down the house they live in.419. if there are, under our constitution some obligations or overriding powers or duties vested in superior courts as learned .....

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

..... of this court in the case of hind overseas private limited v. raghunath prasad jhunjhunwala and ors. : [1976]2scr226 :although the indian companies act is modelled on the english companies act, the indian law is developing on its own lines. our law is also making significant progress of its own as and when necessary. where the ..... needle industries newey (india) holding ltd. & ors. : [1981]3scr698 rendered by chandrachud, c.j. shows the importance of foreign decisions in deciding case arising under the indian company law which out of necessity has to keep pace with the well established principles prevailing in many other parts of the world for sustaining international trade and commerce. adoption of ..... various other persons dealing with the firm.74. it has to be borne in mind that a company can only be wound up in accordance with the provisions of the indian companies act. the right to have a company wound up is a right created by the statute. the entire proceeding in relation to the winding .....

Star India P. Ltd. Vs. the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT455

..... we have already analyzed the respective shareholding of the petitioners, brushing aside the skein of holding companies, and the minuscule and infinitesimal number of shares in indian hands. mr. shenoy has forcefully posited that the indian constitution, as explained in benett coleman, does not consider it essential that a `class action' ..... the very least expected of the petitioners was to plead facts establishing that they are indian citizens. their argument is that the petitioners have deliberately refrained from doing so since they are in fact foreign companies transacting business in india. indubitably the burden to clarify their status as citizens of ..... the foreign shareholding is to the tune of over 68%, 31.63% shares are held by indian companies and no share are held by individuals. as regards discovery communications india pvt. ltd., 100% shares are owned by foreign companies namely, discovery channel (mauritius) pvt. ltd., discovery production inc. and discovery communications ltd., .....

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... commissions of inquiry constituted by the government of india to inquire into excesses committed during the emergency and in respect of matters concerning maruti and its associate companies and the central government was of the view that the petitioner should be available in india to give evidence before these commissions of inquiry and she should ..... in all india bank employees' association v. national industrial tribunal : (1961)iillj385sc . the legislation which was challenged in that case was section 34a of the banking companies act and it was assailed as violative of article 19(1)(c). the effect of section 34a was that no tribunal could compel the production and inspection of any ..... politics of the party-in-power or the planning economics of the government of the day? is it conceivable that an indian will forfeit his right to go abroad because his flowing side-burns or sartorial vagaries offend a high-placed authority's sense of decency the point is that liberty can be curtailed only if .....

Unni Krishnan, J.P. and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC2178; JT1993(1)SC474; 1992(2)SCALE703; (1993)1SCC645; [1993]1SCR594

..... (or the corresponding legislation, if any, e.g., tamil nadu religious and charitable endowments act and a.p. religious and charitable endowments act.) no individual, firm company or other body of individuals, by whatever appellation called - except those mentioned above - will be permitted to establish and/or administer a professional college. all the ..... of institutions have sprung up in the country that style themselves:medical college; andwhereas, such institutions charge large sums as capitation fees, a practice which the indian medical association and the medical council of india have opposed a number of times; and whereas, such institutions neither have suitable buildings, nor proper equipment and ..... establish an educational institution under article 19(1)(g)?3. does recognition or affiliation make the educational institution an instrumentality?7. all these matters raise a burning issue; as to how to put an end to the evil of capitation fee or at least to regulate it.8. as a prelude, the .....

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC937; [1983]54CompCas674(SC); (1983)2CompLJ281(SC); 1983(2)SCALE16; (1983)4SCC166; [1983]3SCR438

..... mills v. u.p. state and anr. : [1980]3scr331 at 343, union of india v. h. s. dhillon : [1972]83itr582(sc) , kerala state electricity board v. indian aluminium company : [1976]1scr552 and state of karnataka and anr. etc. v. ranganath reddy and anr. : [1978]1scr641 . applying this doctorine of pith and substance, section 58a which is ..... the amendment being extension of limited liability benefit to insurance and banking companies. the amending acts, one in 1866 and the other in 1913 followed. the indian companies act of 1913 was a fairly comprehensive measure taking into its stride the amendments in u.k. companies act till then made. this act was extensively amended in 1936 and ..... form and in such manner as may be prescribed.(3) (a) every deposit accepted by a company at any time before the commencement of the companies (amendment act, 1974 in accordance with the directions made by the reserve bank of indian under chapter iiib of the reserve bank of india act, 1934(2 of 1934), shall, unless .....

A.K. Roy ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC710; 1982CriLJ340; 1981(4)SCALE1904; (1982)1SCC271; [1982]2SCR272

..... liberties of the people, though subject to the limitations imposed by part iii, we must reject the contention that preventive detention is basically impermissible under the indian constitution.39. the third contention centers around the 44th constitution amendment act, 1978, with particular reference to section 1(2) and section 3 thereof, ..... to be. the constituent assembly indubitably thought, despite the strong and adverse impact which the governor-general's ordinance-making power had produced on the indian community in the pre-independence era, that it was necessary to equip the president with legislative powers in urgent situations. after all, the constitution makers ..... the executive is a great enemy of freedom and therefore, eternal vigilance is necessary in the realm of liberty. but we cannot transplant, in the indian context and conditions, principles which took birth in other soils, without a careful examination of their relevance to the interpretation of our constitution. no two .....