Bundle - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bundle Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.007 seconds)American Surety Co. Vs. Marotta
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-1933
american surety co v marotta 287 u s 513 1933 u s supreme court american surety co v marotta 287...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCullen Fuel Co., Inc. Vs. W. E. Hedger, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-06-1933
cullen fuel co inc v w e hedger inc 290 u s 82 1933 u s supreme court cullen fuel...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundara Rajali Vs. Gopala thevan and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-10-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Mad100; 150Ind.Cas.132
walsh j 1 the plaintiff sued on a lost pronote which he said had been executed in his favour by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.E. James Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-09-1933
Reported in: AIR1933Cal606a
lort williams j 1 this is an appeal against an order of the additional presidency magistrate of calcutta summoning the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubodhchandra Niyogi Vs. Bhubalika Dasee
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-22-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Cal356
mitter j 1 this is an appeal by defendant 3 from a preliminary decree made by the subordinate judge of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalachand Bysack Vs. Amulyadhone Banerjee
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-17-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Cal474
panckridge j 1 this is a suit of a somewhat unusual kind there was a suit of 1904 relating to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Surjya Kumar Sen and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-14-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Cal221,147Ind.Cas.32
..... inspector of police accompanying the party states that he found the bundle of papers tied up in a towel on clearing hyacinth ..... police officer accompanying the military party had provided himself with a bundle of forged and incriminating documents for the purpose of planting it ..... is satisfied of the bona fides of the discovery of the bundle there is no reason to entertain suspicions as to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArcos, Limited Versus E. A. Ronaasen and Son
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Feb-02-1933
..... referred to as the said 28 in staves were redwood and whitewood staves bundled and were in length not less than 28 ins and not more ..... to as the said 17 in staves were redwood and whitewood staves bundled and were in length not less than 17 ins and not more ..... archangel during the summer 1930 the first contract specified redwood and whitewood staves bundled 90 standards 1 2in by 28 ins by 2 ins to 5 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShibadas Daw and ors. Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-26-1933
Reported in: AIR1934Cal114,147Ind.Cas.1172
..... produced them on 11th march there were four bomb patkas and a bundle containing iron pieces and other things madhu took two light bomb patkas ..... bomb patka and a man who has not been identified took the bundle and another bomb patka they went to the house of the sub ..... house then they threw their missiles and there were three explosions the bundle did not explode and they ran away upto this point kalu s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiam Lal and ors. Vs. the Collector of Agra
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-19-1933
Reported in: 148Ind.Cas.100
..... very difficult to say definitely that in every case the bundle of rights possessed by the zemindar would necessarily outweigh the bundle of rights possessed by an occupancy tenant and even if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial