Browning - Judgment Search Results

Brown Vs. Wainwright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... by petitioners is questionable under prior precedents of this court and deserves plenary consideration petitioner brown and 122 other florida inmates sentenced to death brought original petitions for writs of habeas corpus ..... wainwright 454 u s 1000 1981 454 u s 1000 joseph green brown et al v louie l wainwright secretary department of corrections florida no 80 6434 supreme .....

Martha A.J. Brown Vs. Amrit Jasper Brown and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H164

..... nisi granted by the learned district judge chandigarh 2 the petitioner mrs martha a j brown had presented the petition under s 10 of the divorce act 1869 on the allegations ..... that she was married to respondent no 1 amrit jas per brown on may 25 1977 in the christ church chandigarh after living together with the petitioner .....

Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1055; 1981(1)SCALE607; (1981)2SCC743; [1981]3SCR435; [1981]47STC376(SC); 1981(13)LC547(SC)

..... 2 the appellant in civil appeal no 1185 of 1979 is m s hindus tan brown boveri ltd a company engaged in the business of manufacturing certain goods which are used .....

Federated Department Stores, Inc. Vs. Moitie

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that of respondent moitie in state court moitie i and respondent brown brown i in the united page 452 u s 396 states district ..... the court indicating that moitie ii has been voluntarily dismissed leaving brown ii as the subject of the petition footnote 2 the court ..... of appeals also affirmed the district court s conclusion that brown ii was properly removed to federal court reasoning that the claims .....

Barry Vs. New Jersy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the causal connection between an illegal arrest and a subsequent confession brown sought to implement the policies behind the use of the ..... after being held for 18 hours while the defendant in brown confessed after only 2 hours is not dispositive as justice ..... illegal arrest and the confession were characterized in unequivocal terms brown s first statement was separated from his illegal arrest by .....

Blackburn Vs. Thomas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a nonunanimous six member jury the court divided three ways in brown and it is essential for our present purposes to identify ..... would have happened with a jury of different size or structure brown v louisiana supra at 340 rehnquist j dissenting need not ..... us on collateral review the retroactivity analysis of the plurality in brown v louisiana thus is not controlling instead the governing position is .....

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... n 447 u s 530 1980 billing envelope inserts carey v brown 447 u s 455 1980 picketing in residential areas schaumburg v ..... strength of or distinguish between various communicative interests see carey v brown 447 u s at 447 u s 462 police dept of ..... could advertise haircuts a political campaign headquarters could advertise vote for brown or vote for proposition 13 more importantly i cannot agree with .....

Estelle Vs. Jurek

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the ultimate issue of voluntariness 623 f 2d at 931 judge brown on the other hand found that jurek s confessions were ..... is important and should be resolved by the court as judge brown recognized we have never explicitly applied the independent review test in ..... accept a legal theory previously rejected by other courts as judge brown put it this case presents in dramatic terms the tensions between .....

Commonwealth Edison Co. Vs. Montana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state such taxes are e conomically and politically analogous to transportation taxes exploiting geographical position brown the open economy justice frankfurter and the position of the judiciary 67 yale l j ..... and institutional considerations suggest that it is appropriate that the court consider this issue see brown at 222 indeed whereas montana argues that the question presented here is one better .....

illinois Vs. Zegart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 166 emphasis supplied by vitale court we amplified this by example brown v ohio we explained depended on the fact that a ..... necessarily has established joyriding as well vitale supra at 417 quoting brown supra at 168 if proof of auto theft had not necessarily ..... logic and producing an irrational result our cases particularly vitale and brown require the courts to look to the statutory elements of the .....