Skip to content


Broker Dealer - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: broker dealer Page 1 of about 1,400 results (0.042 seconds)
Jun 08 1987 (FN)

Shearson/American Express Vs. Mcmahon

Court: US Supreme Court

Respondents were customers of petitioner Shearson/American Express Inc. (Shearson), a brokerage firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under "no person other than a municipal securities broker, municipal securities dealer, or person associated with such a municipal securities broker or

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1975 (FN)

United States Vs. Nasd, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

The load is divided between the principal underwriter and the broker-dealers, compensating them for their sales efforts. [ Footnote 4 ] 1941, requires that principal underwriters enter into agreements with the dealers who distribute the fund's securities. See National Association of Securities

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1991 (FN)

Holmes Vs. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Court: US Supreme Court

not rest its claimed subrogation to the rights of the broker-dealers' customers on any provision of SIP A. See Brief for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 1985 (FN)

Bateman Eichler Vs. Berner

Court: US Supreme Court

therefore express no views with respect to the liability of brokerage firms as "controlling persons" in cases such as this. [ barred from pursuing a damages action, finding that the muffler dealers had relatively little bargaining power and that they had been

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 2006 (FN)

Anza Vs. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

development to dividend payouts. Cf. id. , at 271 (The broker-dealers simply cannot pay their bills, and only that intervening insolvency

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2006 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Jaipur Stock Exchange

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (2007)108TTJ(JP.)393

individual tra- of making profit and provis- dings of the brokers do not ions of Section 13 apply. attract provisions of of brokers, dealers and jobbers. The activities of the brokers, dealers and jobbers in stocks, shares and like securities were to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 1997 (FN)

United States Vs. O'Hagan

Court: US Supreme Court

via the mechanism of a securities transaction-for example where a broker is directed to purchase stock for a client and instead

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2010 (FN)

Hemi Group, Llc Vs. City of New York

Court: US Supreme Court

SIPC had a duty to reimburse customers of certain registered broker-dealers in the event the broker-dealers were unable to meet their

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 1984 (HC)

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Hind Tea Company (P.) Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1984]57STC97(Cal)

of such registered dealers in tea, to whom the said broker had actually sold the tea. Such point of decision has the officer concerned, that similar deduction like those other fellow dealers and manufacturers should also be given to them and that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 2003 (TRI)

Srj Securities Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

both the business, but the question is whether the share broker and share dealing can be said to be one composite individual is acting as a dealer or working as a dealer, he is a master of his own what scrip to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //