Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mokameh Unit And The Arthur Butler And Company Muzaffarpore Limited Acquisition And Transfer Of Undertaking Act 1978 Section 19 - Judgment Search Results

Anil Kumar Neotia and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC1353; (1988)2CompLJ91(SC); JT1988(2)SC227; 1988(1)SCALE817; (1988)2SCC587; [1988]3SCR738; 1988(2)LC77(SC)

Oil Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company the business, affairs and properties of the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited and Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Company Limited. It was of Undertakings) Act, 1978 and the Ganesh Flour Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1984.In the present case Polytex Limited were acquired from the income of the Kanpur Unit. Reference may be made to page 23 of Compilation D-III 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) the Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, ascertaining whether an impugned piece of legislation in relation to acquisition or requisition of property is within legislative competence, the two Aluminium Undertakings) Act, 1984, the Amritsar Oil Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited (Mohameh general public are served by the continuance by the said undertakings of the Company of the manufacture, production and distribution of urged that it was contrary to the preamble to the Act because according to the preamble it was to ensure continuance and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1978 and the Ganesh Flour Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer The shares would also fall in the second limb of Section 3(1) being right and title of the company in relation Swadeshi Cotton Mills Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). It appears that there was an

Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC782; [1989]65CompCas1(SC); (1988)1CompLJ225(SC); 1988(36)ELT201(SC); JT1988(1)SC304; 1988(1)SCALE273; (1988)2SCC299; [1988]2SCR962; 1988(2)LC54(SC)

Oil Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company that in the event the annual general meeting of the company is allowed to be held, an independent Chairman should be that Swadeshi Polytex Limited and Swadeshi Mining and Manufacturing Company Limited were two separate undertakings distinct from the six textile undertakings of Undertakings) Act, 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and 1982, the Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) the Britannia Engineering Company Limited Mohameh Unit) and the Arthur Butler and Company (Muzaffarpore) Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, assumed that no compensation was provided for particular item, the acquisition of the 'inam' is valid. In the instant case Section an ordinance namely, Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Ordinance, 1986 which was promulgated on 19th of which already stood vested and formed part of the textile undertakings could not be dealt with in any manner other than public are served by the continuance of the undertakings. The Act was passed to give effect to the principles specified in order made by the Central Government on 13th of April, 1978 under Section 18AA(1)(a) of the IDR Act taking over the if they were to vest in the Central Government under Section 3 of the Act and the result of which would petition being SLP (Civil) No. 3112 of 1987. On 9th'March, 1987 this Court passed orders in this special leave petition directing

In Re: Electronics Ltd. (In Liqn)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002(64)DRJ402

entitled to. Support can be found for this view in Britannia Engineering Company Ltd. (In liquidation) [1983] 54 Comp. Cas. 277.18. to. Support can be found for this view in Britannia Engineering Company Ltd. (In liquidation) [1983] 54 Comp. Cas. 277.18. The as to whether this provision would have application to a company in liquidation they would stand dispelled by Rule 9 of contemplated by Section 445(3) of the Act.11. In Rohtas Industries Limited (in Liquidation), [2000] 99 Comp. Cas. 503 , the issue or other employee of the company to deliver, surrender or transfer forthwith or within such time as the Court may directs peacefully vacate the premises in their occupation, they may file undertakings to this effect within a period of two months from Board constituted under the Orissa Khadi and Village Industries Board Act was an industry governed by the provisions of the I.D. High Court has expressed the view that the proviso to Section 25-FFF of the I.D. Act would not apply, I would to payment under Section 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It was argued in the court below that all the

O.L. of Aryodaya Spg. and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Charansingh Dhups ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2005]125CompCas765(Guj); [2004]56SCL133(Guj)

case demand, for determining the rights of the parties. [Britannia Engineering Company Ltd., In re : [1983] 54 Company Cases 277]30. In the affidavit in support of the judges summons in Company Application No. 278/2001, Paragraph as mentioned in Annexure 'A' hereto out the land to Aryodaya Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company'). Therefore, wherever reference is against the company in liquidation pending in any court and transfer to itself and to dispose of the same. Therefore, section or the 61 persons even on an annual basis. This act itself goes to show that the aforesaid stand adopted by & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. v. M/s. A.R.Chadha & Co., AIR 1978 DELHI 167 and Karnataka Steel & Wire Products & Ors. way of an amendment, brought into force the provisions of Section 458-A, so that an official liquidator, who is supposed to is pertinent to note that despite so-called Compliance Affidavit dated 19-12-2003 made by the said Shri Bhupatsingh Dhupsingh neither has any

In Re: Bharat Steel Tubes Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 121(2005)DLT65

of the approach suggested by the Calcutta High Court in Britannia Engineering Co. Ltd. (supra), wherein emphasising that the law of High Court, Bombay and Anr. 1983 (54) Comp.Cas. 702.(ii) Britannia Engineering Company Ltd., In re: (In liquidation) 1983 (54) Comp.Cas. 277.(iii) according to law.'3. On the basis of aforesaid reference, the company petition was registered as CP No. 55/2000. It may be case of Dr. S.P. Bhargava v. Haryana Electric Steel Company Limited, New Delhi and Anr. (supra). That was also a case this Court has held otherwise in the case of Life Insurance Corporation of India (supra), which would be binding on me. the takeover filed an application before the Tribunal that the transfer by the company was without consideration and was not reasonably [1973]1SCR515 . It will be immediately clear that the 1971 Act deals with a very limited objective. It only means that Ltd. was ordered to be wound up on 2nd February, 1978 and winding up proceedings were pending before the Company Court. the provisions of the P.P. Act, including the provisions that Section 15 provides a bar of jurisdiction of Civil Courts to 468 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, to pass such order as it may think proper, which

Jagojyoti Roy Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court: Kolkata

by merging DA at 1510 point of Consumer Price Index. Britannia Engineering Company Ltd., started its operation in the year 1979 respondent company 1151 employees approximately were covered under the Tripartite Engineering Wage Settlement. About 64 employees of the level supervisors and scales of the officers and managerial staff of the respondent company to bring parity or near-parity with the emoluments of similar (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 appointing M/s. Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Limited. It is also not in dispute that the Government of the above company went into liquidation. The management of Titagarh unit was taken over by the Government of India under industries(Development the Government of India under the industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 appointing M/s. Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Limited. It is also West Bengal constituted a Pay Commission for the aforesaid 21 undertakings which were manufacturing units for the purpose of finalizing recommendations over by the Government of India under industries(Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, appointing M/s. Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. to run the first question regarding entitlement to the pay scale admissible to Section Officers should not detain us longer. The answer to the State of West Bengal Vs. Deb Kumar Mukherjee, reported in 1995 Supp(2) SCC 640 and the relevant portion of the above

Britannia Engineering Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Basu Mazumdar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1961)IILLJ310Cal

which is the managing agents for the petitioner 1, the Britannia Engineering Company, Ltd. The respondent 3, Jnanendra Nath Chatterjee, was is the managing agents for the petitioner 1, the Britannia Engineering Company, Ltd. The respondent 3, Jnanendra Nath Chatterjee, was employed that after making an investigation into the conduct of the Company the tribunal is called upon to name a sum or of McLeod & Co., Ltd. In January 1940 he was transferred to Britannia Engineering Works at Titaghur and subsequently in 1943 been specified or referred to. Under Section 36A of the Act, a reference cannot be made In order to supplement the accordance with law, under Section 36A or any other appropriate section of the Industrial Disputes Act. No order as to costs. Engineering Company.2. After the enactment of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Government of West Bengal set up some omnibus tribunals,

State Bank of India Vs. Vijay Kumar Tayal and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1997]89CompCas424(Delhi)

R.C. Lahoti J. in State Bank of India v. Samneel Engineering Company : 1995(35)DRJ485 , it is now well-settled that suits Lahoti J. in State Bank of India v. Samneel Engineering Company : 1995(35)DRJ485 , it is now well-settled that suits for a third person and is concerned with the enhanced financial limits granted to the various Tayal group of concerns and not the court shall, as soon as may be after such transfer, forward the records of such suit or other proceeding to and Financial Institutions Act, 1993' (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. By virtue of section 17 of the Act, the of the Tayal group of companies are facing charges under section 120 of the Indian Penal Code, and section 120 of My attention has been drawn to an order dated July 19, 1995, passed by N.G. Nandi J. in Suit No. 3195

Workmen, Employed in Engine Valves Limited Vs. Engine Valves Limited

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1983)IILLJ232Mad

pleadings. 18. Reliance is then made on Shankar Chakravarti v. Britannia Biscuit Company : (1979)IILLJ194SC , in which it was laid Ambalavanan and Muralidharan by the first respondent - Management of Engine Valves Limited, Madras, was correct. First respondent charge-sheeted these two learned Counsel for management refers to M/s. Iron and Steel Company v. Their Workmen (supra), and contends that prior to 15th no jurisdiction to reappraise the evidence. It is for the limited aspects, as laid down in Balipara Tea Estate (supra), it it being commission of service act of misconduct viz., an act subversive of discipline. First respondent herein (hereinafter referred to as the case of a bus conductor in the State Transport undertaking in State of Haryana v. Rattan Singh : (1982)ILLJ46SC , longer available to a Tribunal constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, subsequent to 15th December, 1971. A reappraisal of evidence contemplates specifically mentioned, yet the failure to refer to the said section by its number would not deprive a workman of the March, 1974, that at about 5.25 p.m. on 15th March, 1974, they assaulted him for having given over-production, at a place

M/s. Sreevaraham Vanitha Samithi, Rep. by its President Vs. Employees ...

Court: Kerala

a decision of the Supreme Court in Shankar Chakravarthi v. Britannia Biscuit Company and another (1979 (2) LJJ 149). At page of the Supreme Court in Shankar Chakravarthi v. Britannia Biscuit Company and another (1979 (2) LJJ 149). At page 207 of proximity or financial dependancy; but the test is whether one unit will survive in the absence of other. 19. Per contra, entire expenditure, as such funds available in the Trust were transferred to the Samithi for meeting such contingencies, as reflected in educational field and hence it is an institution in which activity of imparting knowledge or training is systematically carried on, falling Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, the 1st respondent herein, under Section 7A of the EPF Act. 5. Relying on Ext.P5 National Medium Nursery and also a Pre-primary School. In the year 1994, the Trust discontinued the said nursery as well as the