Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1988Ori166; 65(1988)CLT440
..... in respect of non-consolidable land will also abate under section 4(4) of the act. 2. in civil revision no. 169 of 1980, the trial court relying on the aforesaid decision of the division bench passed the order under section 4(4) of the act holding that the suit abated. the plaintiff filed the revision petition contending that the ..... becomes necessary to ascertain the intention of the legislature with reference to the preamble to the act and its statements of objects and reasons. the learned single judges while deciding the cases of abhimanyu panda (1976) 42 cut lt 400 and musa jena (air 1980 orissa 183) (supra) rightly relied upon them. another important aspect to be considered while ..... court in respect of such land will abate under section 4(4) of the act. it answered the question in the affirmative and overruled the decisions in the case of abhimanyu panda (1976) 42 cut lt 400 and in the case of musa jena (air 1980 orissa 183) (supra) which had taken a contrary view. as it appears from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 19(1981)DLT55; 1981(2)DRJ22
..... filed on 12/7/1979 and the certified copy of the judgment and order of the additional controller dated 1/4/1976 was filed in this court on 3/11/1980 during the course of hearing of the appeal. mr. ishwar sahai submits that the filing of the certified copy of the order of the additional controller along with the memorandum ..... it desirable to decide the appeal on merits also. mr. ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant, has raised one question. he says that under section 14(l)(e) of the act it is not necessary for the landlord to prove that the premises were let for residential purposes. he argues that the landlord has failed to prove the same. his argument ..... eviction of the appellant vide order dated 1/4/1976. the tribunal held that the respondent was entitled to an order of eviction under section 14(l)(e) of the act. (2) mr. ishwar sahai, learned counsel for the respondent has taken a preliminary objection that the appeal is barred by time. as i have sataed earlier, the judgment under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR561(Delhi); 123(2005)DLT532
..... now known simply as high trees in which the principle of promissory estoppal was established) and mareva v. international bulk carriers (1980) 1 all er 213 (thenceforward 'mareva injunction' has become a term of art) have in fact acted as catalysts for statutory activity. civil courts in common-law countries have a duty, which cannot be deferred, postponed or ..... application for this purpose. this is also the expressed view of the apex court in sukanya holdings (supra). in sudarshan chopra and ors. v. company law board and ors. the division bench of the punjab & haryana high court rejected the argument that the arbitrator alone was competent under section 16 of the arb. & con ..... , 2001 to be illegal and void.(g) issue a permanent injunction against defendant nos. 3 and 4 restraining them from effecting any changes: (i) in the board of directors of skycell communications ltd., (ii) in the capital of skycell communications ltd., and (iii) in the name of skycell communications ltd. and/or from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : (2013)1SCC1
..... be followed by the companies for the issue of securities were mainly contained in the companies act 1948, the companies act 1980 and the prevention of fraud in investment act 1958. later, in england, the companies act 2006 was enacted making detailed and important changes to the legal treatment of shares. securities ..... making it clear to the two companies, that non compliance would result in appropriate action under the companies act, the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the sebi act), as also, the regulations framed thereunder. both the companies, without furnishing details sought by sebi, ..... and regulating the working of the depositories, participants, custodians of securities, foreign institutional investors, credit rating agencies and such other intermediaries as the board may, by notification, specify in this behalf;(c) registering and regulating the working of venture capital funds and collective investment schemes, including mutual .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [1999]236ITR220(Bom)
..... a domestic company. that under section 108 a company need not be a domestic company is also clear from the circular of the central board of direct taxes and from section 2(17) of the income-tax act. the authority in indo-nippon chemical co. ltd.'s case : [1986]161itr635(bom) , also supports this view. 86. thus ..... thus, to be seen that the entire definition of 'subsidiary company' as given in the companies act was not adopted in the finance (no. 2) act. the division bench took note of an earlier judgment in mafatlal gagalbhai and co.'s case : [1980]122itr382(bom) , wherein it was observed that the authorities applying the taxation laws would perforce have ..... to go to the companies act to consider which was a holding company and which was a subsidiary company. the division bench then held that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR818
..... behalf of the respondent no. 1 firstly relied on the judgment of the apex court reported in the case of sharif-ud-din v. abdul gani lone, : [1980]1scr1177 . in the said case the election in question was pertaining to the legislative assembly of state of jammu & kashmir and it was governed by the provisions ..... appreciate the submissions made by the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1 regarding non-compliance of provision of section 81(3) of the said act, it would be relevant to have a look at the said section. section 81(3) reads as follows:'81. presentation of petitions.---(1) ..................(2) ..................(3) ..... exporters, bangalore, reported in : 1999crilj2276 , wherein the apex court had held while deciding the question in respect of proceedings under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881, on the question whether the notice was in writing, the apex court had held that sending notice by fax was permissible and it amounted to giving notice .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)
..... authenticity of the documents filed by them in a manner known to law. if such a course is not adopted by the respondents, the board is expected to eschew the documents filed by the respondents. but the board acting on such inadmissible evidence dismissed the application.89. in roman catholic mission v. state of madras : [1966]3scr283 , the district judge took ..... as per the price list of the respondent-company. to prove the falsity of the case of the respondents, the petitioners furnished the account of piston pins for the years 1980, 1994-95 and 1996-97. the table is extracted hereunder :stock position of piston pins in the balance-sheets of s. r. m. t.piston pins19801994-951996- ..... of the reconciliation statement. the falsity in the plea of the respondent-company can be exposed in another manner also. from the annual reports for the years 1980 and 1996-97 (after board order in c. a. no. 65 of 1996) it is seen that there are no discrepancies in the stocks of the piston pins. if other engine .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : AIR1994Ker179
..... assistance of shri k. v. manickam, chief engineer (thermal division), madras and also shri n. d. madhavan namboodiri, deputy chief engineer, kerala state electricity board. the commissioner took them for inspecting various electrical works. there are serveral complaints on this score. the more important complaints dealt with by the commissioner related ..... the temple administration. some drastic steps, including legislative measures, are required to revamp the temple administration. the committee may be renamed as guruvayur devaswom board and they have to be full time members devoting their entire time for the purpose for which they are chosen. competent officers of the government ..... decision on that basis.11. sri krishna temple, guruvayur is governed by the guruvayur devaswom act, 1978 (act 14 of 1978). there are 43 sections in the said act. the government have framed rules entitled 'guruvayur devaswom rules, 1980'. there are 20 rules in the said rules. there are three main full bench .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1995]84CompCas230(Guj)
..... to be diluted. it has also enumerated the circumstances which led it to the borrowings. it is also pointed out that by taking various steps, the board of directors of mil has acted in the best interest of the company. even after selling 4 lake equity shares in nocil, mil has been able to retain its control in nocil even ..... one method to the exclusion of other methods, may at times, bring about differences of opinion. in the case of piramal spinning and weaving mills ltd., in re [1980] 50 comp cas 514 the learned single judge of the bombay high court, while approving the scheme of amalgamation, held that the valuation of shares was a technical matter which ..... was grossly unfair. (piramal spinning and weaving mills ltd., in re ). 258. similarly, in the case of coimbatore cotton mills ltd. and lakshmi mills co. ltd., in re [1980] 50 comp cas 623 a learned single judge of the madras high court observed that it is impossible to calculate the real value of any share with mathematical accuracy. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR2000Raj396; 2000(3)WLC278
..... . whereas section 194 deals with the permission necessary for certain projections, drain pipes etc.40. section 138 of the municipalities act empowers the board to charge fee for certain licences to be granted by the board under the act for permission for making any temporary erection or for putting any projection or for temporary occupation of any public street.41. ..... fee must be shown to be expended for the purpose for which the fee is levied. in the case of kewal krishan puri v. state of punjab, (1980) 1 scc 416 : (air 1980 sc 1008) and other connected cases, it was held :--(i) the constitution recognises a different and distinct connotation between taxes andfees. (ii) a fee is ..... .29. in the case of h.h. shri swamiji of shri admar mutt v. commissioner, hindu religious and charitable endowments department, (1979) 4 scc 642 : (air 1980 sc 1), it was held by the supreme court that for the purpose of finding whether there is a co-relationship between the services rendered to the fee payers and .....
Tag this Judgment!