Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: brahmaputra board act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 10 of about 2,925 results (0.169 seconds)

Regional Director, E.S.i.C. Vs. Golden Gate Restaurant

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR1078]; (2002)ILLJ972Bom

..... aforesaid 37 persons were receiving any wages from the respondent restaurant. it is however an '. admitted position that the aforesaid 37 persons were given free lodging and free boarding by the respondent restaurant in lieu of their working in the establishment. the aforesaid 37 persons were getting free training in the establishment of the respondent restaurant. in ..... tune of rs. 56,772.21 and rs. 49,176.15 towards the contribution in respect of the employees employed by the employer for two different periods viz. january 1980 to october 1982 qua 37 persons and april 15, 1983 to august 1985 qua seven persons. 2. the facts are straight and, simple. the employer is a ..... agreements. in the present case there was no such agreement entered by the parties under the apprentices act. in the present case the names of the 37 persons were found in the regular attendance register and they were given free boarding and free lodging by the respondent for the work done by them. the facts in the present .....

C. Kannan Vs. Returning Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1081; 1989(1)KarLJ409

..... the mention of 'an election agent' would appear to be unnecessary because an election agent is the alter ego of the candidate in the scheme of the act and his acts are the acts of the candidate, consent or no consent on the part of the candidate.'(emphasis supplied)16. having now ascertained the substantive rights in the making of ..... satisfy the requirement of section 83(1)(c) and the proviso thereof and also section 83(2) of the act is permissible arises for consideration. a similar question arose before the supreme court in shariff-ud-din v. abdul gani lone : [1980]1scr1177 . that case involved the provisions of section 89(3) and section 94 of the jammu and kashmir ..... representation of the people act (4 of 1957). section 89(3) corresponds to section 81(3) of the act and section 94 corresponds to section 86(1) of the .....

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

..... the learned senior counsel also had drawn the attention of this court to different provisions of the act and also different provisions of the indian companies act 1956 and further explained the remedies available under the company law board. the learned senior counsel while laying emphasis on the aspect of the maintainability of the writ ..... union of india : [1978]2scr621 , r.d. shetty v. international airport authority of india : (1979)iillj217sc , kasturi lal lakshmi reddy v. state of j&k; : [1980]3scr1338 and ajay hasia v. khalid mujib sehravardi : (1981)illj103sc . where there is arbitrariness in state action, article 14 springs in and judicial review strikes such an action down. ..... limited v. m & n publications limited : air1996sc51 the apex court at para-12 observed:from the facts of the case of kasturi lal lakshmi reddy : [1980]3scr1338 (supra), it shall appear that every year the state used to auction the blazes in different forests. most of the contractors bidding at the auction had .....

Sonik Industries, Rajkot Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Rajk ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC151; (1987)1GLR250; 1986(1)SCALE500; (1986)2SCC608; [1986]2SCR59; 1986(2)LC33(SC)

..... the rules was available in the. municipal office does not constitute sufficient compliance with law.8. reliance was placed by the appellant on chunni lal v. the municipal board, shri madhopur 1956 i.l.r. raj 568 before us. in that case, on a difference of opinion between two learned judges of the rajasthan high court, ..... (1971)12glr603 but in that case the high court was concerned with the stage of publication of the draft rules, that is to say the preliminary procedure enacted under the act before imposing a tax. learned counsel for the appellant has referred to commissioner of sales-tax, uttar pradesh v. modi sugar mills ltd. : [1961]2scr189 , the municipal ..... held that the provision for inspection of the rules in the municipal office did not constitute publication within the meaning of section 62 of the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951. the high court in that case was influenced by the particular evidentiary material before it, on the basis of which it reached the conclusion that it .....

Anoop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division No. 1 Pani ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the high court's power to issue writ of certiorari under article 226 of the constitution - syed yakoob v. k.s. radhakrishnan : (1964) 5 scr 64, municipal board, saharanpur v. imperial tobacco of india ltd. : (1999) 1 scc 566, lakshmi precision screws ltd. v. ram bhagat : (2002) 6 scc 552, mohd. shahnawaz akhtar ..... bharat electronics ltd. : (1981) 3 scc 225, l. robert d'souza v. executive engineer, southern railway : (1982) 1 scc 645, surendra kumar verma v. industrial tribunal : (1980) 4 scc 443, gammon india ltd. v. niranjan das : (1984) 1 scc 509, gurmail singh v. state of punjab : (1991) 1 scc 189 and pramod jha v. ..... the respondent had offered compensation to the appellant before discontinuing his engagement/employment, which amounts to retrenchment within the meaning of section 2(oo) of the act. in his statement, the appellant categorically stated that before discontinuing his service, the respondent did not give him notice pay and retrenchment compensation. shri ram chander .....

Haji Siddik Haji Umar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC259; 1983(1)SCALE48; (1983)1SCC408; [1983]2SCR249

..... (xii of 1949), or under any other corresponding law 'repealed by the administration of evacuee property ordinance, 1949 (xxvii of 1949), then notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force, such proceeding shall be disposed of as if the definitions of 'evacuee property' and 'evacuee' contained in section ..... , saurashtra on july 3, 1954. this decision again was not questioned in any court. a notification under section 12 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 was issued in respect of the properties in question on june 8, 1955. no further effective action appears to have been taken by haji umar kasam against ..... is the decision of this court in dr. rajendra prakash sharma v. gyan chandra and ors. : [1980]3scr207 in which the evacuee concerned migrated to pakistan in the year 1967 after the insertion of section 7a of the act.23. there is a further hurdle in this case which has arisen on account of the publication of .....

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs. Kantha Chandra and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1989Kant1

..... connected with and all land (not being private property) adjacent and appertaining to such works are vested in and made subject to the control of, the board under s. 26 of the act.15. the lands in question are situated on both the banks of arkavathy river which is the only source of feeding water to t.g. halli reservoir ..... heard by the tribunal along with appeals nos. 3 to 6 of 1980. 5.1. before the tribunal among other contentions, respondent- i in each one of these petitions also raised preliminary objections as to the maintainability of the appeals on two grounds viz., that the board was not a party to the proceeding, therefore, it could not be ..... in the remain on petitions were filed before the divisional commissioner, who by the order dated 30th september 1980 held that the revision petitions were not maintainable. therefore, the board took back the revisions and presented them before the 3rd respondent as appeals. these appeals were registered as appeals nos. 12 to 40, 42 and 43 of .....

Kommisetty Nammalwar and Co. Rep. by Its Proprietor Kommisetty Nammalw ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT431:AIR2009NOC2482(A.P)(F.B).

..... contended by the learned government pleader and the learned standing counsel representing the respondents that the writ petition to be dismissed.107. in swedish match ab v. securities & exchange board of india : 2004(11) scc 641 at para 52 the apex court observed:it is a well-settled principle of law that where wordings of a statute are absolutely ..... right of calling for the exercise of the powers shall be confined to the persons so described.40. the principle was quoted with approval by supreme court in g.e. board v. girdharlal : air 1969 sc 267, state of gujarat v. shantilal : air 1969 sc 634, ramchandra v. govind : air 1975 sc 915, and shiv kumar chadha v. ..... all products of cows, buffalo, bullocks, bulls, goats etc., shall have to be treated as products of livestock for the purpose of the act. here we may refer to ram chandra kailash kumar v. state of u.p. : air 1980 sc 1124, dineshchandra jamnadas gandhi v. state of gujarat : air 1989 sc 1011, sita devi v. state of bihar : 1995 supp .....

M.A. Dharman, Son of Appukuttan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT315

..... in zilla parishad, moradabad v. k.s. mills, amroha : [1968]1scr1 wherein it was held as follows:'a provision like section 128 of the u.p. district boards act for an appeal against an assessment to tax is there, but the fact that the petitioner has not availed of it, does not oust the jurisdiction of the high court ..... to be interpreted in accordance with the state's international obligations as was pointed out by krishna iyer, j. in jolly george verghese v. the bank of cochin, : [1980]2scr913 . there is need for harmonisation whenever possible bearing in mind the spirit of the covenants. in this context it may not be out of place to bear in ..... central government on 20-7-1990. though the same were not challenged by the detenus by way of separate wirt petitions, their cases were reviewed by the central advisory board, new delhi which found that there was no sufficient cause for their detention. consequently, the orders of preventive detention passed against the detenus stood revoked.7. the main .....

Umaji Keshao Meshram and ors. Vs. Radhikabai, Widow of Anandrao Banapu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1272; (1986)88BOMLR432; 1986(1)SCALE681; 1986Supp(1)SCC401; [1986]1SCR731; 1986(2)LC319(SC)

..... 23, 1534, negotiated by shah khwajeh on behalf of bahadur shah and nano da cunha the viceroy of goa, on behalf of the king of portugal, and signed on board the galleon 'san mateos', bahadur shah ceded to the king of portugal 'the city of bassein, its territories, islands and seas' (which included the above-mentioned seven islands ..... to itself from a subordinate court a case involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution.24. by section 8 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 (act 37 of 1956), a new state of bombay was formed with effect from 'the appointed day', namely, november 1, 1956, comprising inter alia certain territories which ..... in shankar naroba salunke and ors. v. gyanchand lobhachand kothari and ors. letters patent appeals nos 3, 10, 11 and 17 of 1979 and 34 of 1980 decided on september 3, 1980. it is against the said order of the division bench that the present appeal by special leave has been filed by the appellants.4. as the appellants' .....