Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: brahmaputra board act 1980 chapter i preliminary Court: chennai Page 7 of about 78 results (0.868 seconds)

Sarasamma Vs. G. Pandurangan and Others

Court : Chennai

..... i is one of the attestor to the will. in the course of cross' examination he has admitted that krishna bai suffered fracture in the hip bone in the year 1980 and was bed-ridden. he further admits that for about 5 or 6 months she took treatment and was thus bed-ridden and thereafter she was cured and was able ..... been admitted. but the appellants' case is that the same has been revoked. however, there is no attesting witness to prove ext.b-19 dated 2-5-1980 and ext. b-20 dated 25-4-1980, which are the two subsequent wills." (c) 2001 (3) ctc 283 (division bench of madras high court) (corra vedachalam chetty vs. g.janakiraman): "25. the ..... the application for grant of probate or letters of administration is not covered by article 137 of the limitation act. same is not correct in view of what has been stated in the kerala state electricity board case (supra) (the kerala state electricity board, trivandrum vs. t.p.kunhaliumma, 1976 (4) scc 634). 16. similarly reference was made to a decision of .....

M. Thangavelu Chetty Vs. Chinnasamy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ142

..... petitioner herein seeks a writ of certiorari from this court to have the order, dated 2nd march, 1981, of the third respondent affirming the order, dated 20th september, 1980 of the second respondent quashed.2. the first respondent herein and his younger brother took a loan of rs. 1,000 from the petitioner on execution of a mortgage ..... in thimmapuram village. the first respondent filed an application under the tamil nadu debt relief act, 1976, hereinafter referred to as the 1976 act, before the second respondent for relief in respect of the mortgage. the second respondent has, by his order, dated 20th september, 1980, held that the 1st respondent owns only a half share in the lands mortgaged, which ..... consist of 0.50 cents wet in s. no. 368 and 0.16 cents dry in s. no. 367//2 of thimmapuram village, and that therefore he is a small farmer owning lands within the limit prescribed by the 1976 act. .....

Marakkal and Others Vs. S.G. Kannappan(died) and Others

Court : Chennai

..... of the property. the sale by the 1st defendant to the 2nd defendant on 12.09.1979 is not a valid transaction. therefore, the subsequent transactions on 07.02.1980 and 07.11.1983 are void. further, those transactions held pending litigations in o.s.no.985/79 and o.s.no.1008/1979, thus, hit by the principle ..... it be statutory under s. 11, civil procedure code or constructive as a matter of public policy on which the entire doctrine rests. 17. section 52 of the transfer of property act, 1882 refers transfer of property pending suit. this section is the emancipation of the doctrine of lis pendens. this section restricts transfer of immovable property by one of the ..... in the documents exhibited as evidence and the pleadings in the earlier suit reveals that the suit property was dealt as the personal property of the first defendant and acted upon. after discussion on the law and the facts, the courts below has held that the suits which were pending during the impugned transactions do not hit either .....

B. Ranganathan and Another Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Polic ...

Court : Chennai

..... instigation of the named first accused b.ranganathan, came to the property along with his hirelings, armed with weapons and put up a shed and installed a board and when the defacto complainant and others met gowri sankar and others in the site, they were threatened with dire consequences, to leave the site, after receiving ..... plaintiffs have produced adangal register relating to the fasli year 1388 corresponding with calendar year 1978-79, which is much prior to compromise decree dated 8.10.1980 and which is also forged document and the same was used to make the court to believe that they are the persons in possession and enjoyment of the ..... and have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc; cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. but .....

S. Venkataraman, Proprietor of Vijayalakshmi Films Vs. K.S. Balakrishn ...

Court : Chennai

..... appeal, it followed that limitation should be computed without exclusion of time taken for obtaining those copies. dealing with that question, the board observed :- their lordships have now to return to the grammatical construction of the act, and they find plain words directing that the time requisite for obtaining the two documents is to be excluded from computation. s.12 ..... the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in p.a. oommen v. moran mar baselius marthoma reported inair 1992 supreme court at page 1977 and at special pages 1980 and 1981, whereby and whereunder at paragraphs 6 and 7 it is observed and held as under: 6. we have given our careful consideration to the arguments advanced by ..... the filing of more than one copy of the judgment in order to save the expenses, but in the present case the plaintiffs in o.s.no.105 of 1980 had already filed a printed copy of the judgment of the subordinate judge and as such there was no question of seeking any order from the appellate court (high .....

M/s. Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt Limited Vs. The Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the provision in relation' to the general object intended to be secured, the mischief, if any, to be prevented and the remedy to be promoted by the act ?. 29. in 1980 1 scc 554 (state of bihar and another vs. j.a.c saldanha and otahers) it has been held as under:- 17. the high court construed the ..... by notification dated 20.01.2014.whereas, under the cblr, 2013 having found the necessity to prescribe a period, the central board, the statutory authority had included the same in the regulations itself, when they were brought into force. therefore, when a time limit is prescribed in regulations, which empowers ..... to complete the proceedings. therefore, by a circular 09/2010 dated 08.04.2010, the necessity to include a time limit for initiating action was addressed by the board after field inspection and by a notification dated 08.04.2010, amendments prescribing time period for initiating action and completing proceedings was made. the same was given effect .....

Sri Thirupuranthakaswamy Devasthanam Represented by Its Executive Offi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1988)1MLJ26

..... first defendant being placed under suspension by order dated 30.11.1973 of the assistant commissioner, h.r. & c.e., board. a register was maintained under section 38 of the then act regarding the properties belonging to the devasthanam.though patta was originally issued in the joint names of devasthanam and the managing trustee, ..... relating to a temple is only between two private parties and the board is not directly concerned, the civil court has jurisdiction to try ..... which even though the board is not impleaded as a party, still rival claims between the parties could be decided by the deputy commissioner under section 63.15. in vallaba ganesar devasthanam v. anandavadivelu : (1980)1mlj140 , a learned single judge of this court has stated..notwithstanding section 108 of the act, where the dispute .....

Valliammal and ors. Vs. Palaniammal (Deceased) and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ127

..... to admit the execution of the will before the sub-registrar and had also registered the same.likewise in the other suit, namely, o.s. no. 489 of 1980 in para 11 the defendants in that suit had pleaded the very same averments with regard to execution and signature of koothan servai. in such circumstances inasmuch as the ..... of succession, it is not for the court to interfere and find fault with him. a will contains the last desire of testator/testatrix. the courts, therefore, normally act in accordance with the wishes of the person concerned. the further observation of their lordships in the said decision, namely, 'but then if the courts were to doubt ..... ordinarily differ from that of proving any other document except to the special requirement of attestation prescribed in the case of a will by section 63 of the succession act. the onus of proving the will is on the propounder and in the absence of suspicious circumstance surrounding the execution of the will, proof of testamentary capacity and .....

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

..... not an invention, but what is recommended for surgical application is only ultra high molecular weight poly ethylene; (ii) that the rotating hinge mechanism was originally developed in 1980s by m/s.howmedica, usa; and (iii) that the use of pivotal hinge is a standard concept, the defendants have not produced any evidence to establish these. ..... know when his actions were safe and lawful.' letter to mcpherson, supra at 181, 182. apparently agreed with jefferson and the board that the courts should develop additional conditions for patentability. although the patent act was amended, revised or codified some 50 times between 1790 and 1950, congress steered clear of a statutory set of requirements other ..... that the process of a metallic implant known as en-prosthesis in the place of the tumor bearing bone through devices, has been in existence even from late 1980s and 1990s and there is no novelty or inventive step; (aa) that the concept of a prosthesis has been there for 15 to 17 years and the .....

K. Sathyabal and Others Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, ...

Court : Chennai

..... (6) ctc 460], is relied upon to show the same principle as laid down in r.d.vijay anand. (17) nandlal khodidas barot v. bar council of gujarat [1980 (supp.) scc 318], is relied upon to show that before referring a complaint to the disciplinary committee, the bar council should apply its mind to the allegations and get satisfied ..... prohibitory orders for more than 100 days. they have filed affidavits, assuring that the lawful functioning of the cisf in the high court will not be disturbed by any act on their part, which may cause interference with the smooth functioning of the administration of justice. but, what tantamount to the lawful functioning of the cisf and what ..... same must be that of the board and not of the chairman. this decision is also relied upon to show that there cannot be excessive delegation. (27) indian council of legal aid v. bar council of india [1995 (1) scc 732], is relied upon to show that while enacting the advocates act, the parliament created agencies at the state .....