Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: brahmaputra board act 1980 chapter i preliminary Court: chennai Page 2 of about 78 results (0.068 seconds)

Feb 09 2012 (HC)

Good Shepherd Evangelical. Vs. Meenakshi Achi

Court : Chennai

..... defendant herein. in the said appeal originally on 11.10.1979, interim stay was granted in c.m.p.no.10061 of 1979 and subsequently on 17.9.1980, interim stay granted in c.m.p.no.10061 of 1979 was made absolute.39. thereafter it appears that some of the defendants had purchased the 1st ..... or by securing a certificate relating to encumbrances (that is copies of entries in the registration registers) from the jurisdictional sub-registrar under section 57 of the registration act, 1908. but a prospective purchaser has no way of ascertaining whether there is any suit or proceeding pending in respect of the property, if the person offering ..... not necessary and proper party; that the appellant is bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration and its right is protected under section 52 of the transfer of property act, 1882; and that no valid reason has been given for dismissing all the three applications, especially when the presence of the appellant will facilitate effective adjudication of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2012 (HC)

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... total violation of the mandatory requirements. 3.18. therefore, according to the proposed party, inasmuch as the various requirements under the various acts, including the tamil nadu pollution control board act, have not been complied with and public hearings have not been conducted, which is mandatory, by relying upon a judgment of the delhi ..... of government company given under section 2(bb) of the atomic energy act, 1962, the central government in 1980s decided to carry out the generation of electricity through nuclear power stations, which was till then under the control of nuclear power board, a constituent unit of the department of atomic energy, and thus npcil ..... was incporated in the year 1987 under the companies act, 1956 as a government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1990 (HC)

G.K. Moopanar, M.L.A. and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2685

..... in zilla parishad, moradabad v. k. s. mills, amroha, : [1968]1scr1 wherein it was held as follows :- 'a provisions like s. 128 of the u.p. district boards act for an appeal against an assessment to tax is there, but the fact that the petitioner has not availed of it, does not oust the jurisdiction of the high court ..... any ray of hope of their release.' the bench followed the decision in krishna iyer, j., in mantoo majumdar and dasdev singh v. state of bihar, 1980 mlw 17 : 1980 clj 546 wherein it was observed that the magistrate concerned have been practically authorising repeated detentions, unconscious of the provisions which obligated them to monitor the proceedings which ..... remand, which are valid in law, cannot be characterised as illegal on that ground. an unreported judgment of this court in w.p. no. 1638 of 1980 dated 21-4-1980 was relied on by the learned advocate-general. 12. before going into the merits of the case we proceed to dispose of the preliminary objections taken out by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1993 (HC)

M. Shanmugha Udayar Vs. Sivanandam and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad123; (1993)IIMLJ617

..... . 2,000/-to rs. 3,000/-. he did minor irrigation contract work wherefrom he got rs. 3,000/- to rs. 4,000/- per year. he was also a district board contractor which yielded him an income of rs. 4.000/- to rs. 5.000/-. he also did building repair work in which he got rs.500/- to rs. 1,000 ..... relevancy and admissibility of these documents could not be disputed. the other documents are four letters purported to have been written by the plaintiff to the appellant during 1972 and 1980. the plaintiff in his counter-affidavit simply states that these documents are not necessary or relevant for deciding the issues in the appeal and he does not admit them. ..... becomes entitled by virtue of the provisions of clause (i) shall be held by her with the incidents of coparcenary ownership and shall be regarded, notwithstanding anything contained in this act or any other law for the time being in force, as property capable of being disposed of by her by will or other testamentary disposition; (iv) nothing in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1994 (HC)

S. Arumugam Vs. the Commissioner of Police Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ194

..... writing, that the person concerned was a goonda. 34. in dhananjoy das v. dist magistrate : 1982crilj1779 while considering a detention order, under section 3, national security act, 1980, the supreme court had occasion to consider the effect of paragraph 1 of grounds of detention, which was by way of introduction or a preamble. in that context, ..... the first ground was that approval of the impugned order was not made within the statutory period and further the meeting of the advisory board was also not within the time-schedule fixed by the act. learned additional public prosecutor brought to our notice that the impugned order was approved on 17-7-1993 and the advisory ..... board had its deliberations on 21-8-1993, both of them within the time-schedule fixed under the act. apparently, this ground has no strength. 44. the next submission was that material papers supplied to the detenu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1996 (HC)

R. Karuppan Vs. R. Namachivayam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(99)ELT214(Mad)

..... g. rohatta : [1965]3scr71 ; l. hirday narain v. income tax officer, bareilly : [1970]78itr26(sc) ; m/s. shiv shankar dal mills v. state of haryana : [1980]1scr1170 ; assistant collector of central excise v. dunlop india ltd. : 1985ecr4(sc) ; dr. kuntesh gupta v. management of hindu kanya mahavidyalaya, sitapur : 1987(32)elt8(sc) and ..... baggage and were cleared against payment of concessional rate of duty. mr. karuppan says that the directions issued by the customs board was pursuant to statutory powers under section 129d of the customs act. therefore, he submits that the guns imported by him should be clear without import licence and on payment of concessional ..... for the adjudicating authority did not consider the past practice of clearing the guns without import licence which had been approved by the finance ministry, customs board and at the tariff conference. the appellant also filed an interim application for an interim direction directing the respondents to release all the guns to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2016 (HC)

K. Ganeshan and Others Vs. Film Certification Appellate Tribunal, Mini ...

Court : Chennai

..... or violative of any of the guidelines. 21. the above is a broad view of the statutory provision and the guidelines framed under the statute, purportedly to act as a guidance to the board while certifying a film for public exhibition. 22. now, we move on to the legal submissions put forth by the learned counsels and the scope of interference ..... anand patwardhan(supra), is also distinguishable on facts, as the film was a documentary and it was the third part of trilogy depicting communal violence, which occurred in mid 1980's and mid 1990's. the film maker had done extensive research before he made the documentary, and it had won the award as the best investigative film and the ..... a u , certificate and partly a a certificate. the film is the third part of a trilogy of documentary films against communal violence that the author made from mid 1980's to the mid 1990's. the questions which fell for consideration were whether any film producer has a right to insist that his film must be shown on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1984 (HC)

C.V. Raman Vs. the Management of Bank of India, Regional Office, South ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1985)2MLJ439

..... government, and therefore, the establishment cannot be viewed as an establishment under the state government within the meaning of section 4(1)(c) of the act.that the board was under the control of the state government did not make them employees of the government, nor did it make the establishment consisting of the clerical ..... an 'authority' and, therefore, 'state' within the meaning of the expression in article 12.the above said decision referred to u.p. warehousing corporation v. vijayanarain : (1980)illj222sc , and the observations made by the learned judge (chinnappa reddy, j.), are also reinforced. it was observed in paragraph 15 as under:it is in the light of ..... assistance is one of the tests. that test is helpful to the instant case. he also cites the decision in u.p. warehousing corporation v. vijayanarain : (1980)illj222sc and contends that the interpretation placed by the petitioner cannot be accepted.40. according to the learned counsel for the second respondent in w.p. no. 11029 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1995 (HC)

Workmen Employed in the Canteen Run by Srf Ltd. Vs. Government of Tami ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1996(73)FLR1354]

..... itself as principal-employer and the contractor should take out a licence under the provisions of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to (contract labour act). in the year 1980, the srf company entered into a contract with the third respondent in writ petition no. 1935 of 1994 by which the third ..... recognised non-statutory canteens was decided on the facts in those cases including the provisions of the railway manual, the notifications and circulars issued by the railway board from time to time and other documents which pertained to the workers employed in the said canteens. none of the material which was taken into consideration ..... that their appointment is made by the department through the agency of the committee society as the case may be. in addition as stated earlier, the railway board by its circular, dated june 8, 1981 had communicated that it was decided to treat the employees of all statutory canteens, as railway servants irrespective of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2010 (HC)

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

..... that there is only initial consumer confusion does not alter the fact that blockbuster would be misappropriating west coast's acquired goodwill".59. the bill board analogy used in brookfield was again cosidered in playboy enterprises, inc. vs. netscape communications corporation {354 f.3d 1020}. in that case, the ..... system was developed by andy van dam in the 1960s, the next decade saw the development of electronic mail, telnet and ftp. the early 1980s brought the transmission control protocol (tcp) and internet protocol (ip) which led to the development of web technology using hyper text markup language ( ..... injunction restraining the defendants, by themselves, their directors, partners, men, servants, agents, broadcasters, representatives, advertisers, franchisees, licensees and/or all other persons acting on their behalf from in any manner infringing and/or enabling others to infringe the plaintiff's registered trademarks bharatmatrimony, tamil matrimony, telugumatrimony, etc., a list .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //