Bound - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bound Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 506 results (0.122 seconds)Pran Sukh Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-08-2003
Reported in: (2003)135PLR519
binod kumar roy c j 1 the petitioner assails validity of the order dated february 18 2003 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaraini Bai Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2003
Reported in: AIR2004P& H206; (2004)136PLR411
binod kumar roy cj 1 the solitary question involved in this writ petition is as to whether the government could...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHema Kakkar Vs. Chandigarh Administration and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-2003
Reported in: (2003)135PLR568
binod kumar roy c j 1 the petitioner who is an advocate of our high court has come up with...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPappu Rai and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-10-2003
chandramauli kumar prasad j 1 this application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 2nd of may 2002...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. Mathews Clare Georgina Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ4060; 104(2003)DLT422; 2003(68)DRJ646; 2003(88)ECC116; 2003(2)JCC634
r c chopra j 1 this petition under section 439 of the code of criminalprocedure hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-27-2003
Reported in: (2004)49SCL117SAT
..... iii persons acting in concert shall be jointly and severally bound by the obligations imposed thereon by the acts and regulations ..... are mandatory in character and the merchant banker is duty bound to carry out the changes and clarifications suggested by sebi pursuant ..... business activities in other words there should be well defined bounds of presumption 1 persons who for a common objective or purpose .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur
Decided on: Feb-28-2003
Reported in: (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)
..... act with the object of mobilizing resources to complete some ongoing irrigation projects in time bound manner for promotion and operation of the said irrigation projects in vidarba region area ..... corporation for the purpose of completion of 10 selected ongoing irrigation projects through a time bound programme the corporation would be a body corporate and functionary body consisting of official and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.A. Choudhary Vs. State of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)ALD357
..... of the agreement between the parties hence the parties were bound by the decision of the umpire our attention was drawn ..... each of the parties hereto the arbitrator shall not be bound to observe the ordinary rules of procedure applicable to trials ..... would be admissible to decide whether the arbitrator travelled outside the bounds of the contract and thus exceeded his jurisdiction in order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-2003
Reported in: [2004]135STC289(Bom)
..... 1scr902 involved the consumption of aviation spirit by a foreign bound aircraft which cannot ever be considered as a sale occasioning ..... pursuant to which the goods were transferred to the foreign bound vessel at the time of the placing of the indents ..... parking and repairs airline offices buildings petrol installations and structures bounded by and within the limits prescribed in the said circular .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaidnath Mishra Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-31-2003
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR121(Jhr)]
..... a representation on 11 12 1989 for grant of first time bound promotion it is contended that no decision was taken by the ..... the meantime respondent nos 4 to 6 were granted first time bound promotion ignoring the case of the petitioner 3 the respondents in ..... respondents nos 4 to 6 have been wrongly and illegally given time bound promotion this court cannot prepetuate the illegality by going into the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial