Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 88 judicial notice Court: allahabad Page 6 of about 672 results (0.167 seconds)

Jul 10 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Phuchai and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1929All33; 113Ind.Cas.417

..... habitual thieves and robbers and were taking precautions to conceal their presence within the limits of the magistrate's jurisdiction.40. the magistrate (trial court) demanded security apparently under section 109(b) because the accused could not 'give a satisfactory account of himself.' the district magistrate on appeal said that the accusedprowls about ..... the local limits of such magistrate's jurisdiction to conceal himself,71. those specific words would have been used. but it may be argued with equal force that if it had intended the words to meantaking precautions to conceal the fact that he is present within the local limits of such magistrate's jurisdiction, ..... words 'within the local limits of such magistrate's jurisdiction,' namely, that they do not qualify the noun, presence, but indicate the locality within which the act of attempted concealment must have taken place, in order to give the magistrate jurisdiction to deal with the case.79. two arguments have been advanced on behalf .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1935 (PC)

Khudawand Karim Khalesan-fi-sabil Allah and anr. Vs. (Babu) Narendra N ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All258

..... section itself is very clearly worded and in the absence of a contract to the contrary a property subject to a mortgage is liable to contribute rateably to the debt secured by the mortgage. no such contract was even alleged in the written statement. nor has, any attempt, been made to prove the existence of such a contract. ..... s admission is not evidence against the other plaintiff, narendra nath, but as narendra nath has acquired his interest in the property from zia-uddin, there is no force in this suggestion. i have no hesitation in agreeing with the learned subordinate judge that the mortgagors did enter into the agreement which the defendants-appellants have set up. ..... before us to enable us to decide the matter for ourselves.5. it has been argued on behalf of the respondents that the provisions of section 92, evidence act, prevent the defendants-appellants from proving the agreement, as there is no mention of such an agreement in the deed of mortgage itself and the agreement would vary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 1950 (HC)

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All257

..... the exercise of the suprema potestas. but in such a case, it must appear that the executive considered the step necessary for the national security and in fact acted on that basis.'425. it is sometimes said that under the british constitution the king in whom executive powers vest has certain prerogatives and he can ..... as always, be the actual language used.'later in the judgment lord wright observed :'it may be that in 1900 the framers of the constitution were thinking of border tariffs and restrictions in the ordinary sense, and desired to exclude difficulties of that nature, and to establish what was and still is called 'free trade,' ..... executive power of the union in the president. sub-article (2) vests, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the defence forces of the union in the president. article 72(1) authorizes the president to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or suspensions, remissions or commutations of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2004 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Ajai Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3926

..... dower or mehr in the case of persons to whom the muslim personal law (shariat) applies.'12. this definition makes it clear that the property or the valuable security need not be as a consideration for marriage, as was required to be in the unamended definition. this apart, the addition of words 'any time' before the expression ..... a.m. the same night in the hospital.11. it should also be taken note of that the amended definition of 'dowry' as contained in dowry prohibition act, 1961, coming into force in 1986, does not leave anything to doubt that the demand made after solemnization of marriage would be dowry. the definition as amended reads as below :'dowry ..... ' means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly--(a) by one party to a marriage to the other party to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1999 (HC)

Rajeev Vashistha (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2242

..... had to be raised. merely on the ground that an accused in detention as an under-trial prisoner was likely to get bail an order of detention under the national security act should not ordinarily be passed.what was stressed in the above case is that an apprehension of the detaining authority that the accused if enlarged on bail would again carry ..... in the backdrop of the above legal position, we are of the opinion that the incident did give rise to 'law and order' problem for the local police and special force had to be deployed in the locality for some time but we are not satisfied that it is a case in which 'public order' was affected to a great extent ..... occasion to observe thus (at page 373 of air) :the impact on 'public order' and law and order' depends upon the nature of the act, the place where it is committed and motive force behind it. if the act is confined to an individual without directly or indirectly affecting the tempo of the life of the community, it may be a matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. District Magistrate, Jalaun and Others</B>

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC77

..... their preventivedetention have questioned the legalityof the orders dated 29.12.1997 passedby respondent no. 1, under section 3(2) of the national security act, 1980(hereinafter referred to as the act).copies of the orders have been filedas annexure-a1 in both the petitions.along with the order of detention,petitioners were also served thegrounds ..... of occurrence was the college premises and the heinous murder was committed in broad day light without having little regard to the security arrangements by deploying p, a. c. and the police force to prevent any kind of disturbance during election of the students union. learned counsel has submitted that activity of such nature ..... the material on record clearly demonstrates that there was commotion and fear and even tempo of life was badly disturbed. in order to restore it, additional police force was summoned from rural areas and it was deployed. thus, it was not a case concerning law and order alone but its reach and effect crossed limits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 1926 (PC)

Ram Sahai Singh Vs. Debi Din

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1926All617; 97Ind.Cas.455

..... of 1924 for the opinion of this court under order 46.8. the plaintiff sued on the basis of a simple mortgage deed executed after the bundelkhand land alienation act came into force. his right to a simple money decree was barred by limitation.9. the subordinate judge found that the mortgage was enforceable and that ordinarily the plaintiff would be entitled ..... order. by reason of the prohibition against the sale under section 16, which, as my brother daniels, j., pointed out during the argument, applies equally to simple money decrees, the security cannot be sold.4. further it appears that in this case the claim for a simple money debt is barred by statute. we have nothing whatever to do with that ..... case no. 634 of 1925 decided on 26th november 1925. the decree holder still had in fact left to him his right to a simple money decree, justice was secured for him and there was no serious hardship. it would seem that as there wa3 in that case a means ready to hand for the plaintiff-mortgagee to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1950 (HC)

Harpal Singh Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All562

..... was enacted and incorporated in the code, by the code of criminal procedure (u. p. amendment act) (u. p. act viii [8] of 1949), is in these terms :'if any person ordered to give security for any specific period under any enactment for the time being in force for the due performance or enforcement of any restriction or condition which may lawfully be imposed ..... various considerations.20. section 123a, criminal p. c., was enacted by u. p. act xlvi [46] of 1948 and as amended by u. p. act viii [8] 1949 runs thus:'if any person ordered to give security (or any specified period under any enactment for the time being in force for the due performance or enforcement of any restriction or condition which may lawfully .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1927 (PC)

Ram Kishore Ahir and ors. Vs. Ram Nandan Ram

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All99; 108Ind.Cas.149

..... simultaneously with rs. 500 for which the holdings were usufructuarily mortgaged, does not and cannot amount to a clog on the equity of redemption. no collateral advantage is secured to the mortgagee independent of the mortgage contract, and there is nothing in the mortgage bond which would, in the words of lord hardwicke, in mellor v. ..... document in dispute. the document was drafted by an ignorant and unskilled patwari whoso knowledge of grammar is elementary and whose education in the matter of drafting documents borders upon the freezing point. document like this should not, therefore, be construed with such meticulous severity as though it was drafted by a skilled conveyancing lawyer of ..... submitted that the law of limitation does not prescribe any period which is to operate as a statutory bar to a defence. the articles of the limitation act apply to suits and applications and not to pleas by way of defence. a defendant may always, by way of equitable defence, set up his mortgage-deed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1962 (HC)

Pushkar Datt Vs. Union of India (Uoi), New Delhi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1963All441; [1962(4)FLR165]; (1962)ILLJ685All

..... i have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that the removal of the plaintiff from the defendant's service was against the mandatory provisions of the government of india act and the rules framed under the state railway establishment code.16. the next question that arises for consideration is whether the order of removal passed in the present ..... service on grounds mentioned in para 1708. the procedure prescribed in para 1707 is in accordance with the provisions of section 240(3) of the government of india act. it would thus appear, that before a railway servant can be removed from service on grounds mentioned in para 1708, the railway authority has got to comply ..... learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant contended that the plaintiff had not been afforded reasonable opportunity within the meaning of section 240(3) of the government of india act against the action proposed to be taken by the defendant in regard to him and further, that the removal order (ex. d) did not specify any reasons .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //